Log Gaussian Cox processes and spatially aggregated disease incidence data

This article presents a methodology for modeling aggregated disease incidence data with the spatially continuous log-Gaussian Cox process. Statistical models for spatially aggregated disease incidence data usually assign the same relative risk to all individuals in the same reporting region (census areas or postal regions). A further assumption that the relative risks in two regions are independent given their neighbor's risks (the Markov assumption) makes the commonly used Besag–York–Mollié model computationally simple. The continuous model proposed here uses a data augmentation step to sample from the posterior distribution of the exact locations at each step of an Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm, and models the exact locations with an log-Gaussian Cox process. A simulation study shows the log-Gaussian Cox process model consistently outperforming the Besag–York–Mollié model. The method is illustrated by making inference on the spatial distribution of syphilis risk in North Carolina. The effect of several known social risk factors are estimated, and areas with risk well in excess of that expected given these risk factors are identified.

[1]  Peter J. Diggle,et al.  Point process methodology for on‐line spatio‐temporal disease surveillance , 2005 .

[2]  P. Diggle Applied Spatial Statistics for Public Health Data , 2005 .

[3]  H. Rue,et al.  An explicit link between Gaussian fields and Gaussian Markov random fields: the stochastic partial differential equation approach , 2011 .

[4]  L. Waller,et al.  Applied Spatial Statistics for Public Health Data: Waller/Applied Spatial Statistics , 2004 .

[5]  Molly K Fitch,et al.  Are neighborhood sociocultural factors influencing the spatial pattern of gonorrhea in North Carolina? , 2011, Annals of epidemiology.

[6]  H. Rue,et al.  Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations , 2009 .

[7]  H. Rue,et al.  An explicit link between Gaussian fields and Gaussian Markov random fields; The SPDE approach , 2010 .

[8]  Richard A. Levine,et al.  Optimizing random scan Gibbs samplers , 2006 .

[9]  Scott A. Sisson,et al.  Statistical Inference and Simulation for Spatial Point Processes , 2005 .

[10]  Irene A. Doherty,et al.  HIV and African Americans in the Southern United States: Sexual Networks and Social Context , 2006, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[11]  J. Besag,et al.  Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics , 1991 .

[12]  O. Perrin,et al.  Reducing non-stationary random fields to stationarity and isotropy using a space deformation , 2000 .

[13]  Leonhard Held,et al.  Gaussian Markov Random Fields: Theory and Applications , 2005 .

[14]  Peter J. Diggle,et al.  Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns , 1983 .

[15]  Olivier Perrin,et al.  Identifiability for non-stationary spatial structure , 1999 .

[16]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Non‐ and semi‐parametric estimation of interaction in inhomogeneous point patterns , 2000 .

[17]  A. Gatrell,et al.  GIS and health , 1998 .

[18]  Haavard Rue,et al.  A toolbox for fitting complex spatial point process models using integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA) , 2012, 1301.1817.

[19]  P. Diggle,et al.  Model‐based geostatistics , 2007 .

[20]  Patrick Brown,et al.  MCMC for Generalized Linear Mixed Models with glmmBUGS , 2010, R J..

[21]  Rob Deardon,et al.  INFERENCE FOR INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL MODELS OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES IN LARGE POPULATIONS. , 2010, Statistica Sinica.

[22]  Neal Alexander,et al.  Bayesian Disease Mapping: Hierarchical Modeling in Spatial Epidemiology , 2011 .

[23]  James S. Clark,et al.  Hierarchical Modelling for the Environmental Sciences: Statistical Methods and Applications , 2006 .

[24]  Patrick Brown,et al.  Spatial modelling of lupus incidence over 40 years with changes in census areas , 2012 .

[25]  Roger Woodard,et al.  Interpolation of Spatial Data: Some Theory for Kriging , 1999, Technometrics.