Mutual Information Reliability for Latent Class Analysis

Latent class models are powerful tools in psychological and educational measurement. These models classify individuals into subgroups based on a set of manifest variables, assisting decision making in a diagnostic system. In this article, based on information theory, the authors propose a mutual information reliability (MIR) coefficient that summaries the measurement quality of latent class models, where the latent variables being measured are categorical. The proposed coefficient is analogous to a version of reliability coefficient for item response theory models and meets the general concept of measurement reliability in the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. The proposed coefficient can also be viewed as an extension of the McFadden’s pseudo R-square coefficient, which evaluates the goodness-of-fit of logistic regression model, to latent class models. Thanks to several information-theoretic inequalities, the MIR coefficient is unitless, lies between 0 and 1, and receives good interpretation from a measurement point of view. The coefficient can be applied to both fixed and computerized adaptive testing designs. The performance of the MIR coefficient is demonstrated by simulated examples.

[1]  Laine Bradshaw,et al.  Measuring the Reliability of Diagnostic Classification Model Examinee Estimates , 2013, J. Classif..

[2]  Wenchao Ma,et al.  A sequential cognitive diagnosis model for polytomous responses. , 2016, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[3]  Cornelis A.W. Glas,et al.  A Comparison of Item-Fit Statistics for the Three-Parameter Logistic Model , 2003 .

[4]  W. A. Nicewander,et al.  Some Reliability Estimates for Computerized Adaptive Tests , 1999 .

[5]  L. A. Goodman The Analysis of Systems of Qualitative Variables When Some of the Variables Are Unobservable. Part I-A Modified Latent Structure Approach , 1974, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  J. Hagenaars Loglinear Models with Latent Variables , 1993 .

[7]  Stephanie T. Lanza,et al.  Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis: With Applications in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences , 2009 .

[8]  Mark J. Gierl,et al.  Estimating Classification Consistency and Accuracy for Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment. , 2012 .

[9]  J. Templin,et al.  Unique Characteristics of Diagnostic Classification Models: A Comprehensive Review of the Current State-of-the-Art , 2008 .

[10]  L. A. Goodman Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable models , 1974 .

[11]  James V. Zidek,et al.  Uncertainty, entropy, variance and the effect of partial information , 2003 .

[12]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[13]  Jonathan Templin,et al.  Diagnostic Measurement: Theory, Methods, and Applications , 2010 .

[14]  Clifford C. Clogg,et al.  Handbook of statistical modeling for the social and behavioral sciences , 1995 .

[15]  Li Cai,et al.  Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of diagnostic classification item response models. , 2016, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[16]  M. Davier The Log‐Linear Cognitive Diagnostic Model (LCDM) as a Special Case of the General Diagnostic Model (GDM) , 2014 .

[17]  J. Vermunt Latent Class Models , 2004 .

[18]  F. Krauss Latent Structure Analysis , 1980 .

[19]  Seonghoon Kim A Note on the Reliability Coefficients for Item Response Model-Based Ability Estimates , 2012 .

[20]  John T. Willse,et al.  Defining a Family of Cognitive Diagnosis Models Using Log-Linear Models with Latent Variables , 2009 .

[21]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[22]  Wen-yi Wang,et al.  Attribute-level and pattern-level classification consistency and accuracy indices for cognitive diagnostic assessment , 2015 .

[23]  P. Fayers Item Response Theory for Psychologists , 2004, Quality of Life Research.

[24]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[25]  Melvin R. Novick,et al.  Some latent train models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability , 1966 .

[26]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[27]  Matthias von Davier,et al.  A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data. , 2008, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[28]  David Thissen,et al.  Comparing score tests and other local dependence diagnostics for the graded response model. , 2014, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[29]  Stephen G. Sireci,et al.  ON THE RELIABILITY OF TESTLET‐BASED TESTS , 1991 .

[30]  D. Eignor The standards for educational and psychological testing. , 2013 .