Google Scholar coverage of a multidisciplinary field
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A Nash,et al. Population geography , 1994, Progress in human geography.
[2] Péter Jacsó. Visualizing overlap and rank differences among web-wide search engines: Some free tools and services , 2005, Online Inf. Rev..
[3] Chris Neuhaus,et al. The Depth and Breadth of Google Scholar: An Empirical Study , 2006 .
[4] Michiel Korthals,et al. The Naked Emperor , 2008 .
[5] Philip E. Ogden,et al. Weaving demography into society, economy and culture: progress and prospect in population geography , 2000 .
[6] Joann M. Wleklinski,et al. Studying google scholar: Wall to wall coverage? , 2005 .
[7] Susan Gardner,et al. Gaga over Google? Scholar in the Social Sciences , 2005 .
[8] Carol Tenopir. Duplication Is Ubiquitous. , 2005 .
[9] Roy Tennant,et al. Is Metasearching Dead , 2005 .
[10] Péter Jacsó,et al. Comparison and Analysis of the Citedness Scores in Web of Science and Google Scholar , 2005, ICADL.
[11] William H. Walters,et al. Bibliographic index coverage of a multidisciplinary field , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[12] Greg R. Notess,et al. Locating uses for local search , 2005 .
[13] Chuck Hamaker,et al. Key issue : Google scholar , 2005 .
[14] Shannon O'Lear. Migration and the environment: a review of recent literature. , 1997 .
[15] Nisa Bakkalbasi,et al. An Examination of Citation Counts in a New Scholarly Communication Environment , 2005, D Lib Mag..
[16] Carol Tenopir,et al. Working for a Vendor. , 2005 .
[17] Eugene Barsky,et al. A look at Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scirus: comparisons and recommendations , 2005 .
[18] M. Carl Drott,et al. Tests of methods for evaluating bibliographic databases: An analysis of the National Library of Medicine's handling of literatures in the medical behavioral sciences , 1986, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[19] Carol Tenopir,et al. Evaluation of Database Coverage: A Comparison of Two Methodologies. , 1982 .
[20] Roy Tennant,et al. Collection Development Today. , 2005 .
[21] Willem Noorlander. The rock, the hard place, and doing business in today's information marketplace , 2005 .
[22] Péter Jacsó,et al. Evaluation of citation enhanced scholarly databases , 2006 .
[23] Judit Bar-Ilan,et al. An ego-centric citation analysis of the works of Michael O. Rabin based on multiple citation indexes , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..
[24] M. Carl Drott,et al. Test of methods for evaluating bibliographic databases: an analysis of the National Library of Medicine's handling of literatures in the medical behavioral sciences , 1986 .
[25] Gary E. Gorman,et al. Giving way to Google , 2006, Online Inf. Rev..
[26] Edward A. Fox. Digital Libraries: Implementing Strategies and Sharing Experiences, 8th International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries, ICADL 2005, Bangkok, Thailand, December 12-15, 2005, Proceedings , 2005, ICADL.
[27] Carol Tenopir,et al. Google in the Academic Library , 2005 .
[28] A. Warnes,et al. Geographical questions in gerontology: needed directions for research , 1990 .
[29] R. Greg,et al. Notess. Scholarly Web Searching : Google Scholar and Scirus , 2005 .
[30] William H. Walters,et al. Later-Life Migration in the United States: A Review of Recent Research , 2002 .
[31] A. Findlay,et al. Population geography: disorder, death and future directions , 1993, Progress in human geography.
[32] A Nash. Population geography. Progress reports. , 1996, Progress in human geography.
[33] Laura Bowering Mullen,et al. Google Scholar and the Library Web Site: The Early Response by ARL Libraries , 2006 .
[34] P. Jacsó. As we may search : Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases , 2005 .
[35] Yvonne Jones. Biology Article Retrieval from Various Databases: Making Good Choices with Limited Resources , 2005 .
[36] Péter Jacsó,et al. Deflated, inflated and phantom citation counts , 2006, Online Inf. Rev..
[37] 松田 直人. 『Google Scholar』の利点 , 2009 .