Body and cardiovascular MR imaging at 3.0 T.

Potential advantages of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 3 T include higher signal-to-noise ratios, better image contrast, particularly in gadolinium-enhanced applications, and better spectral separation for spectroscopic applications. In terms of clinical imaging, these advantages can mean higher-spatial-resolution images, faster imaging, and improved MR spectroscopy. However, achieving superior imaging and spectroscopic quality at 3 T can be challenging. This review discusses many of the problems encountered in body and cardiovascular MR imaging at 3 T, such as increased susceptibility, B1 field inhomogeneity, and increased specific absorption rate. The article also considers solutions that are being pursued, such as parallel imaging, variable-rate selective excitation, and variable flip angle sequences. A review of the most commonly used pulse sequences provides practical tips on how these can be optimized for 3-T imaging. In the coming few years, substantial improvements in 3-T technology for clinical imaging and spectroscopy will undoubtedly be seen. An understanding of the basic principles on which these developments are based will help radiologists translate the advances into better imaging studies and, ultimately, better patient care.

[1]  Dennis W J Klomp,et al.  Optimal timing for in vivo 1H‐MR spectroscopic imaging of the human prostate at 3T , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  M. Bronskill,et al.  T1, T2 relaxation and magnetization transfer in tissue at 3T , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Jacob Sosna,et al.  MR imaging of the prostate at 3 Tesla: comparison of an external phased-array coil to imaging with an endorectal coil at 1.5 Tesla. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[4]  Kieran Clarke,et al.  Determination of cardiac volumes and mass with FLASH and SSFP cine sequences at 1.5 vs. 3 Tesla: A validation study , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  R. Lenkinski,et al.  Breathhold abdominal and thoracic proton MR spectroscopy at 3T , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  R. Balaban,et al.  Musculoskeletal MR imaging at 4 T and at 1.5 T: comparison of relaxation times and image contrast. , 1995, Radiology.

[7]  E. Merkle,et al.  Abdominal MR imaging at 3T. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[8]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Cardiac Steady-State Free Precession CINE Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3.0 Tesla: Impact of Parallel Imaging Acceleration on Volumetric Accuracy and Signal Parameters , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[9]  J Paul Finn,et al.  Analysis of Cardiac Function—Comparison Between 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla Cardiac Cine Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Preliminary Experience , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[10]  M. Wendland,et al.  T1 and T2 relaxivity of intracellular and extracellular USPIO at 1.5T and 3T clinical MR scanning , 2006, European Radiology.

[11]  Klaas P Pruessmann,et al.  Parallel Imaging at High Field Strength: Synergies and Joint Potential , 2004, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[12]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Prostate spectroscopy at 3 Tesla using two‐dimensional S‐PRESS , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  R S Balaban,et al.  MR imaging contrast in human brain tissue: assessment and optimization at 4 T. , 1996, Radiology.

[14]  J. Mintorovitch,et al.  Comparison of Magnetic Properties of MRI Contrast Media Solutions at Different Magnetic Field Strengths , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[15]  Thoralf Niendorf,et al.  Toward single breath‐hold whole‐heart coverage coronary MRA using highly accelerated parallel imaging with a 32‐channel MR system , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal‐to‐noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: Application with cardiac imaging and a 32‐channel cardiac coil , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Frank G Shellock,et al.  Biomedical implants and devices: Assessment of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0‐Tesla MR system , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  M. McDougall,et al.  64‐channel array coil for single echo acquisition magnetic resonance imaging , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  Jürgen Gieseke,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast at 3.0 and 1.5 T in the same patients: initial experience. , 2006, Radiology.

[20]  J Huston,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla: initial clinical experience. , 2001, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[21]  J. Glockner,et al.  3 Tesla MR imaging provides improved contrast in first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging over a range of gadolinium doses. , 2005, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[22]  MR liver imaging and cholangiography in the presence of surgical metallic clips at 1.5 and 3 Tesla , 2006, European Radiology.

[23]  Diego R. Martín,et al.  Approach to abdominal imaging at 1.5 Tesla and optimization at 3 Tesla. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[24]  K. Scheffler,et al.  Easy improvement of signal‐to‐noise in RARE‐sequences with low refocusing flip angles , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  J. V. van Engelshoven,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced peripheral MR angiography at 3.0 Tesla: Initial experience with a whole‐body scanner in healthy volunteers , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[26]  K. Scheffler,et al.  Multiecho sequences with variable refocusing flip angles: Optimization of signal behavior using smooth transitions between pseudo steady states (TRAPS) , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  A. Macovski,et al.  Variable-rate selective excitation , 1988 .

[28]  Zahi A Fayad,et al.  Gradient echo acquisition for superparamagnetic particles with positive contrast (GRASP): Sequence characterization in membrane and glass superparamagnetic iron oxide phantoms at 1.5T and 3T , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  Jürgen Hennig,et al.  Experimental analysis of parallel excitation using dedicated coil setups and simultaneous RF transmission on multiple channels , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  B. Hargreaves,et al.  Variable‐rate selective excitation for rapid MRI sequences , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  Lawrence Dougherty,et al.  Abdominal imaging at 4 T MR system: a preliminary result. , 2003, European journal of radiology.

[32]  L. Wald,et al.  32‐channel 3 Tesla receive‐only phased‐array head coil with soccer‐ball element geometry , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  L. Dougherty,et al.  A direct comparison of signal behavior between 4.0 and 1.5 T: a phantom study. , 2003, European journal of radiology.

[34]  Dennis W J Klomp,et al.  Initial Experience of 3 Tesla Endorectal Coil Magnetic Resonance Imaging and 1H-Spectroscopic Imaging of the Prostate , 2004, Investigative radiology.

[35]  K. Brandt,et al.  Adding in vivo quantitative 1H MR spectroscopy to improve diagnostic accuracy of breast MR imaging: preliminary results of observer performance study at 4.0 T. , 2005, Radiology.

[36]  Ray F. Lee,et al.  Coupling and decoupling theory and its application to the MRI phased array , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[37]  R. Edelman,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Pancreas at 3.0 Tesla: Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison With 1.5 Tesla , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[38]  Brian M Dale,et al.  Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T what is the ultimate gain in signal-to-noise ratio? , 2006, Academic radiology.

[39]  S. Holland,et al.  NMR relaxation times in the human brain at 3.0 tesla , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[40]  J. Finn,et al.  Renal Magnetic Resonance Angiography at 3.0 Tesla Using a 32-Element Phased-Array Coil System and Parallel Imaging in 2 Directions , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[41]  P. Börnert,et al.  Transmit SENSE , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[42]  J C Gore,et al.  The Loss of Small Objects in Variable TE Imaging: Implications for FSE, RARE, and EPI , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[43]  P. A. Rinck,et al.  Field strength and dose dependence of contrast enhancement by gadolinium-based MR contrast agents , 1999, European Radiology.

[44]  I. Nöbauer-Huhmann,et al.  The optimal use of contrast agents at high field MRI , 2006, European Radiology.

[45]  Hiroto Hatabu,et al.  MR imaging at high magnetic fields. , 2003, European journal of radiology.

[46]  N. Rofsky,et al.  MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: preliminary results. , 2004, Radiology.

[47]  F. Shellock,et al.  Drug eluting coronary stent: in vitro evaluation of magnet resonance safety at 3 Tesla. , 2005, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[48]  R S Balaban,et al.  MR relaxation times in human brain: measurement at 4 T. , 1996, Radiology.

[49]  Robert E Lenkinski,et al.  Sodium MRI of the human kidney at 3 Tesla , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[50]  C. Kuhl,et al.  MRI of the pelvis at 3 T: very high spatial resolution with sensitivity encoding and flip-angle sweep technique in clinically acceptable scan time , 2006, European Radiology.

[51]  J Paul Finn,et al.  Cardiac Cine Imaging at 3 Tesla: Initial Experience With a 32-Element Body-Array Coil , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[52]  Thoralf Niendorf,et al.  Comprehensive Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3.0 Tesla: Feasibility and Implications for Clinical Applications , 2006, Investigative radiology.