Too close to collaborate? How geographic proximity could impede entrepreneurship and innovation

Numerous studies focus on successful clusters to demonstrate that geographic proximity enables collaboration and innovation. Yet, practitioners still need to understand why some clusters fail to collaborate despite their geographic proximity. This longitudinal study investigates an ICT public–private innovation cluster that fails to collaborate and explores how geographic, institutional, organizational, cognitive and social proximities interplay. The findings show that: (1) social proximity is the most important proximity to achieving collaboration; (2) close geographic proximity can be a barrier to social proximity; and (3) geographic distance is seen as an accelerator of entrepreneurship and innovation. These findings contribute to the literature on clusters and innovation by arguing that contexts of high cognitive, organizational, institutional and geographic proximities do not facilitate communication and collaboration. Specifically, geographic proximity can have a negative impact on social proximity. Finally the paper illustrates that clusters created by economic policies are less prone to innovation compared to spontaneous ecosystems emerging from private entrepreneurial initiatives.

[1]  Michael E. Porter Las cinco fuerzas competitivas que le dan forma a la estrategia , 2008 .

[2]  Ron Adner,et al.  Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations , 2009 .

[3]  David Urbano,et al.  Overview of Collaborative Entrepreneurship: An Integrated Approach Between Business Decisions and Negotiations , 2009 .

[4]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[5]  Franz Huber,et al.  Do clusters really matter for innovation practices in Information Technology? Questioning the significance of technological knowledge spillovers , 2012 .

[6]  R. Boschma Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2005 .

[7]  Luu Trong Tuan Behind knowledge transfer , 2012 .

[8]  Jeffrey L. Furman,et al.  The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity , 2000 .

[9]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[10]  Pierre-Alexandre Balland,et al.  Proximity and the Evolution of Collaboration Networks: Evidence from Research and Development Projects within the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Industry , 2012 .

[11]  A. Scott Technopolis: High-Technology Industry and Regional Development in Southern California , 1994 .

[12]  D. Siegel,et al.  The role of market and technological knowledge in recognizing entrepreneurial opportunities , 2012 .

[13]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation and Strategy , 2007 .

[14]  T. Davenport,et al.  Reverse Engineering : Google's Innovation Machine , 2008 .

[15]  P. Oinas,et al.  Proximity, External Relations, and Local Economic Development , 2005 .

[16]  B. Harrison The Italian industrial districts and the crisis of the cooperative form: Part II , 1994 .

[17]  A. Langley Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[18]  Francesc Xavier Molina-Morales,et al.  The Mediating Effect of Cognitive Social Capital on Knowledge Acquisition in Clustered Firms , 2010 .

[19]  A. Torre,et al.  Is geographical proximity necessary in the innovation networks in the era of global economy? , 1999 .

[20]  Martina Kauffeld-Monz Knowledge spillovers within regional networks of innovation and the contribution made by public research , 2005 .

[21]  Johanna Hautala,et al.  Cognitive proximity in international research groups , 2011, J. Knowl. Manag..

[22]  Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli,et al.  Technology districts: proximity and knowledge access , 2007, J. Knowl. Manag..

[23]  Y. Rabeau,et al.  Évolution des relations coopétitives et rationalités des acteurs dans les écosystèmes d'innovation , 2012 .

[24]  Peter Maskell,et al.  Localized Learning and Industrial Competitiveness , 1995 .

[25]  M. Storper The Resurgence of Regional Economies, Ten Years Later , 1995 .

[26]  A. Amin,et al.  Learning and Adaptation in Decentralised Business Networks , 1999 .

[27]  Sandra Rolim Ensslin,et al.  Environmental disclosure management: a constructivist case , 2012 .

[28]  M. Porter Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[29]  P. Cooke,et al.  The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions, and Innovation , 2000 .

[30]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[31]  C. Ashworth,et al.  Marketing and organisational development in e-SMEs: understanding survival and sustainability in growth-oriented and comfort-zone pure-play enterprises in the fashion retail industry , 2012 .

[32]  James F. Moore Business Ecosystems and the View from the Firm , 2006 .

[33]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Methods in Our Madness? Trends in Entrepreneurship Research , 1992 .

[34]  Giovanni Battista Dagnino,et al.  Untangling the Rise of Coopetition: The Intrusion of Competition in a Cooperative Game Structure , 2007 .

[35]  B. Pentland Building Process Theory with Narrative: from Description to Explanation , 1999 .

[36]  S. Sedita,et al.  Learning at the boundaries in an "Open Regional Innovation System": A focus on firms' innovation strategies in the Emilia Romagna life science industry , 2010 .

[37]  M. Castells,et al.  Technopoles of the World. The Making of 21st Century Industrial Complexes , 1995 .

[38]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Optimal Cognitive Distance and Absorptive Capacity , 2005 .

[39]  B. Nooteboom Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies , 2000 .

[40]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[41]  Gerhard Untiedt,et al.  Are there really high-tech clusters? The geographic concentration of German manufacturing industries and its determinants , 2006 .

[42]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Innovation: Location Matters , 2001 .

[43]  Rodney Turner,et al.  Project management in small to medium‐sized enterprises: Tailoring the practices to the size of company , 2012 .

[44]  Jorge Niosi,et al.  The internationalization of industrial R&D : From technology transfer to the learning organization , 1999 .

[45]  Lilach Nachum,et al.  Product differentiation, external economies and MNE location choices: M&As in Global Cities , 2005 .

[46]  A. Shaw,et al.  On the Analytical Dimension of Proximity Dynamics , 2000 .

[47]  Pratim Datta An applied organizational rewards distribution system , 2012 .

[48]  Ron Boschma,et al.  Some Notes on Institutions in Evolutionary Economic Geography , 2009 .

[49]  J. Howells Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Geography , 2002 .

[50]  M. Castells Technopoles of the world , 1994 .

[51]  Patricia H. Thornton THE SOCIOLOGY OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP , 1999 .

[52]  P. Oinas,et al.  The Evolution of Technologies in Time and Space: From National and Regional to Spatial Innovation Systems , 2002 .

[53]  Corinne Autant-Bernard The Geography Of Knowledge Spillovers And Technological Proximity , 2001 .

[54]  Sheila M. Puffer,et al.  Two Decades of Russian Business and Management Research: An Institutional Theory Perspective , 2011 .

[55]  F. Dwyer,et al.  Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships: , 1987 .

[56]  P. McCann,et al.  Innovation, agglomeration, and regional development , 2005 .

[57]  Christian Longhi,et al.  Networks, collective learning and technology development in innovative high-technology regions : the case of Sophia-Antipolis , 1999 .

[58]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[59]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[60]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[61]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Entrepreneurship Through Social Networks , 1986 .