In vivo Comet assay--statistical analysis and power calculations of mice testicular cells.

The in vivo Comet assay is a sensitive method for evaluating DNA damage. A recurrent concern is how to analyze the data appropriately and efficiently. A popular approach is to summarize the raw data into a summary statistic prior to the statistical analysis. However, consensus on which summary statistic to use has yet to be reached. Another important consideration concerns the assessment of proper sample sizes in the design of Comet assay studies. This study aims to identify a statistic suitably summarizing the % tail DNA of mice testicular samples in Comet assay studies. A second aim is to provide curves for this statistic outlining the number of animals and gels to use. The current study was based on 11 compounds administered via oral gavage in three doses to male mice: CAS no. 110-26-9, CAS no. 512-56-1, CAS no. 111873-33-7, CAS no. 79-94-7, CAS no. 115-96-8, CAS no. 598-55-0, CAS no. 636-97-5, CAS no. 85-28-9, CAS no. 13674-87-8, CAS no. 43100-38-5 and CAS no. 60965-26-6. Testicular cells were examined using the alkaline version of the Comet assay and the DNA damage was quantified as % tail DNA using a fully automatic scoring system. From the raw data 23 summary statistics were examined. A linear mixed-effects model was fitted to the summarized data and the estimated variance components were used to generate power curves as a function of sample size. The statistic that most appropriately summarized the within-sample distributions was the median of the log-transformed data, as it most consistently conformed to the assumptions of the statistical model. Power curves for 1.5-, 2-, and 2.5-fold changes of the highest dose group compared to the control group when 50 and 100 cells were scored per gel are provided to aid in the design of future Comet assay studies on testicular cells.

[1]  G. Speit,et al.  The comet assay as an indicator test for germ cell genotoxicity. , 2009, Mutation research.

[2]  S. Li,et al.  [Induction of micronucleus by organophosphorus pesticides both in vivo and in vitro]. , 1993, Hua xi yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of West China University of Medical Sciences = Huaxi yike daxue xuebao.

[3]  Helena Geys,et al.  Recommendations on the statistical analysis of the Comet assay , 2011, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[4]  Trevelyan Square,et al.  Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline Comet assay , 2003 .

[5]  M. Beth-Hübner.  Toxicological evaluation and classification of the genotoxic, carcinogenic, reprotoxic and sensitising potential of tris(2-chloroethyl)phosphate , 1999 .

[6]  D G Altman,et al.  Statistics notes: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence , 1995 .

[7]  P. Duez,et al.  Statistics of the Comet assay: a key to discriminate between genotoxic effects. , 2003, Mutagenesis.

[8]  G. Pfeifer,et al.  DNA adduction and mutagenic properties of acrylamide. , 2005, Mutation research.

[9]  A. Çelik,et al.  The protective role of curcumin on perfluorooctane sulfonate-induced genotoxicity: single cell gel electrophoresis and micronucleus test. , 2013, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[10]  D. Murdoch,et al.  P-Values are Random Variables , 2008 .

[11]  Marianne Dybdahl,et al.  The influence of the number of cells scored on the sensitivity in the comet assay. , 2012, Mutation research.

[12]  D. E. Stevenson,et al.  Studies on the oral toxicity of p-tert-butyl benzoic acid in rats. , 1965, Food and cosmetics toxicology.

[13]  P. Verde,et al.  Application of public-domain statistical analysis software for evaluation and comparison of comet assay data. , 2006, Mutation research.

[14]  G. Moens,et al.  In vivo and in vitro biological effects of the flame retardants tris(2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate and tris(2-chlorethyl)orthophosphate. , 1982, European journal of cancer & clinical oncology.

[15]  R R Tice,et al.  Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline Comet assay. 4th International Comet Assay Workshop. , 2003, Mutagenesis.

[16]  M. Bernstein,et al.  Agents affecting the male reproductive system: effects of structure on activity. , 1984, Drug metabolism reviews.

[17]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .

[18]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .

[19]  H. Levene.  Robust tests for equality of variances , 1961 .

[20]  R. Tice,et al.  Single cell gel/comet assay: Guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing , 2000, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[21]  Raymond R Tice,et al.  Comparison of flow cytometry- and microscopy-based methods for measuring micronucleated reticulocyte frequencies in rodents treated with nongenotoxic and genotoxic chemicals. , 2008, Mutation research.

[22]  Jiri Aubrecht,et al.  New and emerging technologies for genetic toxicity testing , 2011, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[23]  K. Witt,et al.  Dose-response assessment of four genotoxic chemicals in a combined mouse and rat micronucleus (MN) and Comet assay protocol. , 2010, The Journal of toxicological sciences.

[24]  Takashi Omori,et al.  Statistical issues in the use of the comet assay. , 2008, Mutagenesis.

[25]  Catherine C. Smith,et al.  Recommendations for design of the rat comet assay. , 2008, Mutagenesis.

[26]  H. Tezuka,et al.  Heritable translocation study in male mice with trimethyl phosphate. , 1985, Mutation research.

[27]  T. Hothorn,et al.  Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models , 2008, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[28]  C. Print,et al.  Germ cell suicide: new insights into apoptosis during spermatogenesis , 2000, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[29]  Martin Bland,et al.  An Introduction to Medical Statistics , 1987 .

[30]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[31]  E. Cemeli,et al.  The comet assay in male reproductive toxicology , 2009, Cell Biology and Toxicology.

[32]  D. Lovell,et al.  Issues related to the experimental design and subsequent statistical analysis of in vivo and in vitro comet studies. , 1999, Teratogenesis, carcinogenesis, and mutagenesis.

[33]  Henry E. Kyburg,et al.  Studies in Subjective Probability , 1965 .

[34]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[35]  Stig Johan Wiklund,et al.  Aspects of design and statistical analysis in the Comet assay. , 2003, Mutagenesis.