The geomagnetic secular‐variation timescale in observations and numerical dynamo models

The knowledge of the spatial power spectra of the main geomagnetic field and of its secular variation makes it possible to define typical timescales τn for each spherical harmonic degree n. Investigating both observations and numerical dynamos, we show that a one‐parameter law of the form τn = τSV/n is satisfied for the non‐dipole field, given the statistical way the observed τn are expected to fluctuate. Consequently, we determine the corresponding secular‐variation timescale τSV from either instantaneous or time‐averaged spectra, leading to a value of 415 ±4555 yr for recent satellite field models. In the broader context of geomagnetic data assimilation, τSV could provide a sensible and convenient means to rescale the time axis of dynamo simulations.

[1]  Mioara Mandea,et al.  The CHAOS-3 geomagnetic field model and candidates for the 11th generation IGRF , 2010 .

[2]  Vincent Lesur,et al.  The second generation of the GFZ Reference Internal Magnetic Model: GRIMM-2 , 2010 .

[3]  Hermann Lühr,et al.  NOAA/NGDC candidate models for the 11th generation International Geomagnetic Reference Field and the concurrent release of the 6th generation Pomme magnetic model , 2010 .

[4]  A. Chulliat,et al.  International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the eleventh generation , 2010 .

[5]  Gauthier Hulot,et al.  An Introduction to Data Assimilation and Predictability in Geomagnetism , 2010 .

[6]  Gauthier Hulot,et al.  Conditions for Earth-like geodynamo models , 2010 .

[7]  Mioara Mandea,et al.  The Magnetic Field of Planet Earth , 2010 .

[8]  Gauthier Hulot,et al.  Earth's dynamo limit of predictability , 2010 .

[9]  Jonathan M. Aurnou,et al.  The magnetic structure of convection-driven numerical dynamos , 2008 .

[10]  Mioara Mandea,et al.  CHAOS—a model of the Earth's magnetic field derived from CHAMP, Ørsted, and SAC‐C magnetic satellite data , 2006 .

[11]  U. Christensen,et al.  Scaling properties of convection-driven dynamos in rotating spherical shells and application to planetary magnetic fields , 2006 .

[12]  Ulrich R. Christensen,et al.  Power requirement of the geodynamo from ohmic losses in numerical and laboratory dynamos , 2004, Nature.

[13]  Gauthier Hulot,et al.  Towards a self-consistent approach to palaeomagnetic field modelling , 2001 .

[14]  H. Storch,et al.  Statistical Analysis in Climate Research , 2000 .

[15]  Matthew R. Walker,et al.  Four centuries of geomagnetic secular variation from historical records , 2000, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[16]  Gauthier Hulot,et al.  An analysis of the geomagnetic field over the past 2000 years , 1998 .

[17]  Gauthier Hulot,et al.  A statistical approach to the Earth's main magnetic field , 1994 .

[18]  F. Lowes,et al.  Spatial Power Spectrum of the Main Geomagnetic Field, and Extrapolation to the Core , 1974 .

[19]  F. Lowes.  Mean‐square values on sphere of spherical harmonic vector fields , 1966 .

[20]  V. Lesur,et al.  GJI Geomagnetism, rock magnetism and palaeomagnetism GRIMM: the GFZ Reference Internal Magnetic Model based on vector satellite and observatory data , 2008 .

[21]  R. Holme,et al.  GJI Geomagnetism, rock magnetism and palaeomagnetism Core surface flow modelling from high-resolution secular variation , 2006 .