Fast identification of transonic buffet envelope using computational fluid dynamics

Purpose This paper aims to present a numerical method based on computational fluid dynamics that allows investigating the buffet envelope of reference equivalent wings at the equivalent cost of several two-dimensional, unsteady, turbulent flow analyses. The method bridges the gap between semi-empirical relations, generally dominant in the early phases of aircraft design, and three-dimensional turbulent flow analyses, characterised by high costs in analysis setups and prohibitive computing times. Design/methodology/approach Accuracy in the predictions and efficiency in the solution are two key aspects. Accuracy is maintained by solving a specialised form of the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations valid for infinite-swept wing flows. Efficiency of the solution is reached by a novel implementation of the flow solver, as well as by combining solutions of different fidelity spatially. Findings Discovering the buffet envelope of a set of reference equivalent wings is accompanied with an estimate of the uncertainties in the numerical predictions. Just over 2,000 processor hours are needed if it is admissible to deal with an uncertainty of ±1.0° in the angle of attack at which buffet onset/offset occurs. Halving the uncertainty requires significantly more computing resources, close to a factor 200 compared with the larger uncertainty case. Practical implications To permit the use of the proposed method as a practical design tool in the conceptual/preliminary aircraft design phases, the method offers the designer with the ability to gauge the sensitivity of buffet on primary design variables, such as wing sweep angle and chord to thickness ratio. Originality/value The infinite-swept wing, unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations have been successfully applied, for the first time, to identify buffeting conditions. This demonstrates the adequateness of the proposed method in the conceptual/preliminary aircraft design phases.

[1]  Daniella E. Raveh,et al.  Efficient infinite–swept wing solver for steady and unsteady compressible flows , 2018 .

[2]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[3]  J. Dandois Experimental study of transonic buffet phenomenon on a 3D swept wing , 2016 .

[4]  Daniella E. Raveh,et al.  Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Study of the Shock-Buffet Instability Mechanism , 2012 .

[5]  Frank Scheurich,et al.  Turbulent Flow Simulations Around a Multi-Element Airfoil Using URANS, DES and ILES Approaches , 2009 .

[6]  A. Jameson,et al.  Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge Kutta time stepping schemes , 1981 .

[7]  B. Benoit,et al.  Buffeting Prediction for Transport Aircraft Applications Based on Unsteady Pressure Measurements , 1987 .

[8]  Eric Coustols,et al.  URANS Computations of Shock-Induced Oscillations Over 2D Rigid Airfoils: Influence of Test Section Geometry , 2005 .

[9]  Ralf Heinrich,et al.  The DLR TAU-Code: Recent Applications in Research and Industry , 2006 .

[10]  Adrien Bérard,et al.  Conceptual Design Prediction of the Buffet Envelope of Transport Aircraft , 2009 .

[11]  B.H.K. Lee,et al.  Self-sustained shock oscillations on airfoils at transonic speeds , 2001 .

[12]  Daniella E. Raveh,et al.  Numerical Study of Shock Buffet on Three-Dimensional Wings , 2015 .

[13]  J. Mottershead,et al.  Transonic aeroelastic simulation for instability searches and uncertainty analysis , 2011 .

[14]  A. Da Ronch,et al.  Evaluation of Dynamic Derivatives Using Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2012 .