Biomarker assay translation from discovery to clinical studies in cancer drug development: quantification of emerging protein biomarkers.

Many candidate biomarkers emerging from genomics and proteomics research have the potential to serve as predictive indexes for guiding the development of safer and more efficacious drugs. Research and development of biomarker discovery, selection, and clinical qualification, however, is still a relatively new field for the pharmaceutical industry. Advances in technology provide a plethora of analytical tools to discover and analyze mechanism-and-disease-specific biomarkers for drug development. In the discovery phase, differential proteomic analysis using mass spectrometry enables the identification of candidate biomarkers that are associated with a specific mechanism relevant to disease progression and affected by drug treatment. Reliable bioanalytical methods are then developed and implemented to select promising biomarkers for further studies in animals and humans. Quantitative analytical methods capable of generating reliable data constitute a solid basis for statistical assessment of the predictive utility of biomarkers. Biomarker method validation is diverse and for purposes that are very different from those of drug bioanalysis or diagnostic use. Besides being flexible, it should sufficiently demonstrate the method's ability to meet the study intent and the attendant regulatory requirements. Several papers have been published outlining specific requirements for successful biomarker method development and validation using a "Fit-for-Purpose" approach. Many of the challenges faced during biomarker discovery as well as during technology and process translation are discussed in this chapter, including preanalytical planning, assay development, and preclinical and clinical validation. Specific references to protein biomarkers for cancer drug development are also discussed.

[1]  Peter E. Barker,et al.  Cancer Biomarker Validation: Standards and Process , 2003 .

[2]  J. Bidart,et al.  Summary report of the Standards, Options and Recommendations for the use of serum tumour markers in breast cancer: 2000 , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[3]  Viswanath Devanarayan,et al.  Development, validation, and implementation of a multiplex immunoassay for the simultaneous determination of five cytokines in human serum. , 2005, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[4]  George Scott,et al.  Recommendations for the design and optimization of immunoassays used in the detection of host antibodies against biotechnology products. , 2004, Journal of immunological methods.

[5]  M. Wilkins,et al.  Optimal replication and the importance of experimental design for gel-based quantitative proteomics. , 2005, Journal of proteome research.

[6]  Wendell C. Smith,et al.  Validation of Assays for the Bioanalysis of Novel Biomarkers: Practical Recommendations for Clinical Investigation of New Drug Entities , 2003 .

[7]  John A. Wagner,et al.  Overview of Biomarkers and Surrogate Endpoints in Drug Development , 2002, Disease markers.

[8]  J O Westgard,et al.  A multi-rule Shewhart chart for quality control in clinical chemistry. , 1981, Clinical chemistry.

[9]  John N Weinstein,et al.  Integromic analysis of the NCI-60 cancer cell lines. , 2004, Breast disease.

[10]  Jean-Philippe Lambert,et al.  Proteomics: from gel based to gel free. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.

[11]  T. Hubbard,et al.  A census of human cancer genes , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[12]  Viswanath Devanarayan,et al.  Fit-for-Purpose Method Development and Validation for Successful Biomarker Measurement , 2006, Pharmaceutical Research.

[13]  Walter S. Liggett,et al.  Measurement Reproducibility in the Early Stages of Biomarker Development , 2005, Disease markers.

[14]  R. G. Das,et al.  Reference reagents for prostate-specific antigen (PSA): establishment of the first international standards for free PSA and PSA (90:10) , 2000, Clinical chemistry.

[15]  A S Leong,et al.  Digital photography in anatomical pathology. , 2004, Journal of postgraduate medicine.

[16]  E. Crawford Use of algorithms as determinants for individual patient decision making: national comprehensive cancer network versus artificial neural networks. , 2003, Urology.

[17]  Richard M Caprioli,et al.  Early Changes in Protein Expression Detected by Mass Spectrometry Predict Tumor Response to Molecular Therapeutics , 2004, Cancer Research.

[18]  J. Yates,et al.  Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  J. T. Macgregor Biomarkers of Cancer Risk and Therapeutic Benefit: New Technologies, New Opportunities, and Some Challenges , 2004, Toxicologic pathology.

[20]  R. W. Hansen,et al.  The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs. , 2003, Journal of health economics.

[21]  R. Neumann,et al.  Potential clinical utility of serum HER-2/neu oncoprotein concentrations in patients with breast cancer. , 2003, Clinical chemistry.

[22]  Sudhir Srivastava,et al.  Biomarkers in cancer screening: a public health perspective. , 2002, The Journal of nutrition.

[23]  Sanjiv S Gambhir,et al.  Quantitative imaging of the T cell antitumor response by positron-emission tomography , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  N. Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry , 1970 .

[25]  Pierre Bedossa,et al.  Identification of a new marker of hepatocellular carcinoma by serum protein profiling of patients with chronic liver diseases , 2005, Hepatology.

[26]  Peter E Barker,et al.  Cancer biomarker validation: standards and process: roles for the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[27]  D. DeMets,et al.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: Preferred definitions and conceptual framework , 2001, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[28]  J. Woodcock,et al.  Translation of pharmacogenomics and pharmacogenetics: a regulatory perspective , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[29]  H. Soares,et al.  Method Validation and Measurement of Biomarkers in Nonclinical and Clinical Samples in Drug Development: A Conference Report , 2005, Pharmaceutical Research.

[30]  S. Taube,et al.  Standard Reference Material for Her2 Testing: Report of a National Institute of Standards and Technology-sponsored Consensus Workshop , 2003, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[31]  Stanley B. Davis,et al.  Quality Management , 2005 .

[32]  Janice M. Reichert,et al.  A guide to drug discovery: Trends in development and approval times for new therapeutics in the United States , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[33]  Massimo Gion,et al.  Considerations on development, validation, application, and quality control of immuno(metric) biomarker assays in clinical cancer research: an EORTC-NCI working group report. , 2003, International journal of oncology.

[34]  J. Listgarten,et al.  Statistical and Computational Methods for Comparative Proteomic Profiling Using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[35]  Innovation OR Stagnation Challenge and Opportunity on the Critical Path to New Medical Products , 2004 .

[36]  Binodh DeSilva,et al.  Recommendations for the Bioanalytical Method Validation of Ligand-Binding Assays to Support Pharmacokinetic Assessments of Macromolecules , 2003, Pharmaceutical Research.

[37]  Richard E. T. Smith,et al.  From the analyst's couch: TLR-targeted therapeutics. , 2005, Nature reviews. Drug discovery.

[38]  P. Ma,et al.  Oncology's trials , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[39]  Bart De Moor,et al.  Using literature and data to learn Bayesian networks as clinical models of ovarian tumors , 2004, Artif. Intell. Medicine.