Diverging and Converging: Integrative Insights on a Paradox Meta-perspective

Paradox theory stands at an exciting moment in organization and management theory. Scholars increasingly seek out insights about the nature and management of contradictory demands to explain a wide array of organizational phenomena across multiple levels of analysis. Our two reviews in the 2016 Academy of Management Annals attest to this growing breadth and depth, each integrating and expanding related, yet different bodies of research. Schad, Lewis, Raisch, and Smith (2016) emphasize the depth of scholarship by analyzing an increasing number of paradox studies within management science. Putnam, Fairhurst, and Banghart (2016) highlight the breadth of scholarship by comparing paradoxes that emerge from multiple theories and paradigms that embrace an interdisciplinary orientation. By drawing on distinct literatures, these two manuscripts reveal diverse insights and reflections about paradoxical demands in organizations. In this integrative reflection, we juxtapose our two review articles, surface distinct assumptions and emphases, highlight complementarities, and raise questions for future scholarship. In doing so, we hope to fuel insights toward a meta-perspective on paradox.

[1]  Mathew L. Sheep,et al.  Knots in the Discourse of Innovation: Investigating Multiple Tensions in a Reacquired Spin-off , 2017 .

[2]  Sebastian Raisch,et al.  Growing New Corporate Businesses: From Initiation to Graduation , 2016, Organ. Sci..

[3]  Scott Banghart,et al.  Contradictions, Dialectics, and Paradoxes in Organizations: A Constitutive Approach† , 2016 .

[4]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Paradox Research in Management Science: Looking Back to Move Forward , 2016 .

[5]  Wendy K. Smith.  Dynamic Decision Making: A Model of Senior Leaders Managing Strategic Paradoxes , 2014 .

[6]  L. Argote,et al.  Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration , 2011 .

[7]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts: A methodological framework , 2011 .

[8]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF PARADOX : A DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM MODEL OF ORGANIZING , 2011 .

[9]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  The Trap of Continual Ownership Change in International Equity Joint Ventures , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[10]  Diether Gebert,et al.  Fostering Team Innovation: Why Is It Important to Combine Opposing Action Strategies? , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[11]  Davide Nicolini.  Zooming In and Out: Studying Practices by Switching Theoretical Lenses and Trailing Connections , 2009 .

[12]  Constantine Andriopoulos,et al.  Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[13]  Robert D. McPhee,et al.  The communicative constitution of organizations: A framework for explanation , 2008 .

[14]  Lotte S. Luscher,et al.  Organizational Change and Managerial Sensemaking: Working Through Paradox , 2008 .

[15]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators , 2008 .

[16]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams , 2005 .

[17]  Jeffrey Braithwaite,et al.  ‘It’s an Interesting Conversation I’m Hearing’: The Doctor as Manager , 2004 .

[18]  Marianne W. Lewis,et al.  Control and Collaboration: Paradoxes of Governance , 2003 .

[19]  Chris Huxham,et al.  Contrary Prescriptions: Recognizing Good Practice Tensions in Management , 2003 .

[20]  I. Palmer,et al.  Managing Discursive Tension: the Co-Existence of Individualist and Collaborative Discourses in Flight Centre , 2002 .

[21]  Q. Huy.  Emotional Balancing of Organizational Continuity and Radical Change: The Contribution of Middle Managers , 2002 .

[22]  Marianne W. Lewis.  Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide , 2000 .

[23]  M. Hatch.  Irony and the Social Construction of Contradiction in the Humor of a Management Team , 1997 .

[24]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[25]  Mary Jo Hatch,et al.  Spontaneous Humour as an Indicator of Paradox and Ambiguity in Organizations , 1993 .

[26]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[27]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories , 1989 .

[28]  J. Ford,et al.  Organizational change in and out of dualities and paradox. , 1988 .

[29]  L. Gruenfeld,et al.  Paradoxes of group life , 1987 .

[30]  J. Kenneth Benson,et al.  Organizations: A Dialectical View. , 1977 .

[31]  H. Garfinkel.  Studies in Ethnomethodology , 1968 .