Forced Disruption of Anatomy Education in Australia and New Zealand: An Acute Response to the Covid‐19 Pandemic

Australian and New Zealand universities commenced a new academic year in February/March 2020 largely with “business as usual.” The subsequent Covid‐19 pandemic imposed unexpected disruptions to anatomical educational practice. Rapid change occurred due to government‐imposed physical distancing regulations from March 2020 that increasingly restricted anatomy laboratory teaching practices. Anatomy educators in both these countries were mobilized to adjust their teaching approaches. This study on anatomy education disruption at pandemic onset within Australia and New Zealand adopts a social constructivist lens. The research question was “What are the perceived disruptions and changes made to anatomy education in Australia and New Zealand during the initial period of the Covid‐19 pandemic, as reflected on by anatomy educators?.” Thematic analysis to elucidate “the what and why” of anatomy education was applied to these reflections. About 18 anatomy academics from ten institutions participated in this exercise. The analysis revealed loss of integrated “hands‐on” experiences, and impacts on workload, traditional roles, students, pedagogy, and anatomists' personal educational philosophies. The key opportunities recognized for anatomy education included: enabling synchronous teaching across remote sites, expanding offerings into the remote learning space, and embracing new pedagogies. In managing anatomy education's transition in response to the pandemic, six critical elements were identified: community care, clear communications, clarified expectations, constructive alignment, community of practice, ability to compromise, and adapt and continuity planning. There is no doubt that anatomy education has stepped into a yet unknown future in the island countries of Australia and New Zealand.

[1]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Going Virtual to Support Anatomy Education: A STOPGAP in the Midst of the Covid‐19 Pandemic , 2020, Anatomical sciences education.

[2]  K. Valter,et al.  How Can We Show You, If You Can't See It? Trialing the Use of an Interactive Three‐Dimensional Micro‐CT Model in Medical Education , 2020, Anatomical sciences education.

[3]  C. Rees,et al.  Re-visioning Academic Medicine Through a Constructionist Lens. , 2019, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[4]  C. Sammut,et al.  Virtual Reality in Anatomy: A Pilot Study Evaluating Different Delivery Modalities , 2019, Anatomical sciences education.

[5]  C. Rees,et al.  How does Donor Dissection Influence Medical Students' Perceptions of Ethics? A Cross‐Sectional and Longitudinal Qualitative Study , 2019, Anatomical sciences education.

[6]  S. Hildebrandt The Role of History and Ethics of Anatomy in Medical Education , 2019, Anatomical sciences education.

[7]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  Knowledge Maps: an Online Tool for Knowledge Mapping with Automated Feedback , 2019, Medical Science Educator.

[8]  John E. Hamilton Cash or kudos: Addressing the effort-reward imbalance for academic employees. , 2019, International Journal of Stress Management.

[9]  G. Kinman Effort-reward imbalance in academic employees: Examining different reward systems. , 2019, International Journal of Stress Management.

[10]  Nick Osbaldiston,et al.  Moral barriers between work/life balance policy and practice in academia , 2019, Journal of Cultural Economy.

[11]  Ashutosh Kumar,et al.  Building Professionalism in Human Dissection Room as a Component of Hidden Curriculum Delivery: A Systematic Review of Good Practices , 2018, Anatomical sciences education.

[12]  Graeme J. Byrne,et al.  The relationship between student engagement with online content and achievement in a blended learning anatomy course , 2018, Anatomical sciences education.

[13]  H. Nicholson,et al.  What do medical students learn from dissection? , 2018, Anatomical sciences education.

[14]  Joseph B. Cuseo Student-Faculty Engagement: Student-Faculty Engagement , 2018 .

[15]  W. Pawlina,et al.  Human skills for human[istic] anatomy: An emphasis on nontraditional discipline‐independent skills , 2018, Anatomical sciences education.

[16]  D. Bolliger,et al.  Engagement Matters: Student Perceptions on the Importance of Engagement Strategies in the Online Learning Environment. , 2018 .

[17]  Nalini Pather,et al.  3D Modelling and Printing Technology to Produce Patient-Specific 3D Models. , 2017, Heart, lung & circulation.

[18]  K. Valter,et al.  Exploring Deep Space - Uncovering the Anatomy of Periventricular Structures to Reveal the Lateral Ventricles of the Human Brain. , 2017, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[19]  Nalini Pather,et al.  3D printing from cardiovascular CT: a practical guide and review. , 2017, Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy.

[20]  Deborah E. White,et al.  Thematic Analysis , 2017 .

[21]  K. Griffiths,et al.  University staff mental health literacy, stigma and their experience of students with mental health problems , 2017 .

[22]  N. Pather,et al.  Commemorations and Memorials: Exploring the Human Face of Anatomy , 2017 .

[23]  William D. Grant,et al.  Effective methods of teaching and learning in anatomy as a basic science: A BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 44 , 2017, Medical teacher.

[24]  Jenna K. Gillett-Swan The challenges of online learning: Supporting and engaging the isolated learner , 2017 .

[25]  M. Estai,et al.  Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review. , 2016, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[26]  Rodney A Green,et al.  Impact of introduction of blended learning in gross anatomy on student outcomes , 2016, Anatomical sciences education.

[27]  D. Falzarano,et al.  SARS and MERS: recent insights into emerging coronaviruses , 2016, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[28]  Christina M. Tschida,et al.  How Faculty Learn To Teach Online: What Administrators Need to Know , 2016 .

[29]  S. Blackley,et al.  Digital andragogy: A richer blend of initial teacher education in the 21st century , 2015 .

[30]  Rolf Schwonke,et al.  Metacognitive Load - Useful, or Extraneous Concept? Metacognitive and Self-Regulatory Demands in Computer-Based Learning , 2015, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[31]  J. Broadbent,et al.  Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review , 2015, Internet High. Educ..

[32]  Linda Price,et al.  Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review , 2014 .

[33]  Diane L. Hughes,et al.  Student outcomes associated with use of asynchronous online discussion forums in gross anatomy teaching , 2013, Anatomical sciences education.

[34]  Frances A. Kennedy,et al.  Perspective: Guidelines for Reporting Team-Based Learning Activities in the Medical and Health Sciences Education Literature , 2012, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[35]  Alison F. Doubleday,et al.  The virtual anatomy laboratory: Usability testing to improve an online learning resource for anatomy education , 2011, Anatomical sciences education.

[36]  P. Collignon Swine flu: lessons we need to learn from our global experience , 2011, Emerging health threats journal.

[37]  Michael Simonson,et al.  Distance education research: a review of the literature , 2011, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[38]  N. Robertson,et al.  Burnout in university teaching staff: a systematic literature review , 2011 .

[39]  R. Harden International Medical Education and Future Directions: A Global Perspective , 2006, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[40]  Taiyu Lin,et al.  A model for synchronous learning using the Internet , 2005 .

[41]  Martin Valcke,et al.  Cognitive load: updating the theory? , 2002 .

[42]  N. Britten,et al.  Using Reflexivity to Optimize Teamwork in Qualitative Research , 1999, Qualitative health research.

[43]  A. Chickering,et al.  Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education , 1987, CORE.

[44]  Adam B. Wilson,et al.  Breaking with Tradition: A Scoping Meta‐Analysis Analyzing the Effects of Student‐Centered Learning and Computer‐Aided Instruction on Student Performance in Anatomy , 2019, Anatomical sciences education.

[45]  H. Ferguson,et al.  Overseas students in Australian higher education: a quick guide , 2019 .

[46]  Evrim Baran Broadbent and Poon, “Self-regulated learning strategies and academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review” , 2019 .

[47]  Lynette K. Watts,et al.  Synchronous and Asynchronous Communication in Distance Learning: A Review of the Literature. , 2016 .

[48]  N. Pather Teaching Anatomy: Prosections and Dissections , 2015 .

[49]  Varna Taranikanti,et al.  Anatomy practical examinations: How does student performance on computerized evaluation compare with the traditional format? , 2012, Anatomical sciences education.

[50]  L. Kimball Managing Distance Learning — New Challenges for Faculty , 1998 .