Physical activity and risk of breast cancer, colon cancer, diabetes, ischemic heart disease, and ischemic stroke events: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013

Objective To quantify the dose-response associations between total physical activity and risk of breast cancer, colon cancer, diabetes, ischemic heart disease, and ischemic stroke events. Design Systematic review and Bayesian dose-response meta-analysis. Data sources PubMed and Embase from 1980 to 27 February 2016, and references from relevant systematic reviews. Data from the Study on Global AGEing and Adult Health conducted in China, Ghana, India, Mexico, Russia, and South Africa from 2007 to 2010 and the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys from 1999 to 2011 were used to map domain specific physical activity (reported in included studies) to total activity. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Prospective cohort studies examining the associations between physical activity (any domain) and at least one of the five diseases studied. Results 174 articles were identified: 35 for breast cancer, 19 for colon cancer, 55 for diabetes, 43 for ischemic heart disease, and 26 for ischemic stroke (some articles included multiple outcomes). Although higher levels of total physical activity were significantly associated with lower risk for all outcomes, major gains occurred at lower levels of activity (up to 3000-4000 metabolic equivalent (MET) minutes/week). For example, individuals with a total activity level of 600 MET minutes/week (the minimum recommended level) had a 2% lower risk of diabetes compared with those reporting no physical activity. An increase from 600 to 3600 MET minutes/week reduced the risk by an additional 19%. The same amount of increase yielded much smaller returns at higher levels of activity: an increase of total activity from 9000 to 12 000 MET minutes/week reduced the risk of diabetes by only 0.6%. Compared with insufficiently active individuals (total activity <600 MET minutes/week), the risk reduction for those in the highly active category (≥8000 MET minutes/week) was 14% (relative risk 0.863, 95% uncertainty interval 0.829 to 0.900) for breast cancer; 21% (0.789, 0.735 to 0.850) for colon cancer; 28% (0.722, 0.678 to 0.768) for diabetes; 25% (0.754, 0.704 to 0.809) for ischemic heart disease; and 26% (0.736, 0.659 to 0.811) for ischemic stroke. Conclusions People who achieve total physical activity levels several times higher than the current recommended minimum level have a significant reduction in the risk of the five diseases studied. More studies with detailed quantification of total physical activity will help to find more precise relative risk estimates for different levels of activity.

[1]  张静,et al.  Banana Ovate family protein MaOFP1 and MADS-box protein MuMADS1 antagonistically regulated banana fruit ripening , 2015 .

[2]  Dan J Stein,et al.  Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 , 2015, The Lancet.

[3]  Neville Owen,et al.  Hours spent and energy expended in physical activity domains: Results from The Tomorrow Project cohort in Alberta, Canada , 2011, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[4]  Gladys Block,et al.  Activities Contributing to Total Energy Expenditure in the United States: Results from the NHAPS Study , 2004, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[5]  I-Min Lee,et al.  Dose Response Between Physical Activity and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease: A Meta-Analysis , 2011, Circulation.

[6]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[7]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  Comparative quantification of health risks. Global and regional burden of disease attributable to selected major risk factors. Volume 1. , 2004 .

[8]  Dean Giustini,et al.  Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study , 2016, Systematic Reviews.

[9]  Dongfeng Zhang,et al.  Physical activity and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective studies , 2013, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[10]  P. Tugwell,et al.  The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses , 2014 .

[11]  R. Tweedie,et al.  A Nonparametric “Trim and Fill” Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis , 2000 .

[12]  M. Tremblay,et al.  Limitations of Canada's physical activity data: implications for monitoring trends. , 2007, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[13]  L. Vatten,et al.  Physical activity and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis , 2015, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[14]  S. Nie,et al.  Leisure time physical activity and cancer risk: evaluation of the WHO's recommendation based on 126 high-quality epidemiological studies , 2015, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[15]  Bernadette A. Thomas,et al.  Global, regional, and national age–sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 , 2015, The Lancet.

[16]  J. Lawson Comparative Quantification of Health Risks. Global and Regional Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risk Factors , 2006 .

[17]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[18]  G. Schuler,et al.  Physical activity , 2001, Public Health Nutrition.

[19]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 , 2012, The Lancet.

[20]  M. Tremblay,et al.  Incidental movement, lifestyle-embedded activity and sleep: new frontiers in physical activity assessment. , 2007, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[21]  M. Jetté,et al.  Metabolic equivalents (METS) in exercise testing, exercise prescription, and evaluation of functional capacity , 1990, Clinical cardiology.

[22]  Dan J Stein,et al.  Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 , 2015, BDJ.

[23]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015 , 2016, Lancet.

[24]  I. Olkin,et al.  Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology - A proposal for reporting , 2000 .