Social dimensions of market-based instruments: Introduction

[1]  Helen Suich,et al.  Access and benefits in payments for environmental services and implications for REDD+: Lessons from seven PES schemes , 2013 .

[2]  R. Greiner,et al.  More than money for conservation: Exploring social co-benefits from PES schemes , 2013 .

[3]  C. Zammit.  Landowners and conservation markets: Social benefits from two Australian government programs , 2013 .

[4]  M. Noordwijk,et al.  Design challenges for achieving reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation through conservation: Leveraging multiple paradigms at the tropical forest margins , 2013 .

[5]  Trong Hoan Do,et al.  Benefit distribution across scales to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) in Vietnam , 2013 .

[6]  J. Mills,et al.  Investigating the incidental benefits of Environmental Stewardship schemes in England , 2013 .

[7]  B. Swallow,et al.  Value chains for bio-carbon sequestration services: Lessons from contrasting cases in Canada, Kenya and Mozambique , 2013 .

[8]  Katie Moon.  Conditional and resistant non-participation in market-based land management: programs in Queensland, Australia , 2013 .

[9]  B. Swallow,et al.  Social dimensions of procurement auctions for environmental service contracts: Evaluating tradeoffs between cost-effectiveness and participation by the poor in rural Tanzania , 2013 .

[10]  Stewart Lockie,et al.  Market instruments, ecosystem services, and property rights: Assumptions and conditions for sustained social and ecological benefits , 2013 .

[11]  J. Bastiaensen,et al.  Payments for ecosystem services: justified or not? A political view , 2010 .

[12]  Robert N. Stavins,et al.  Incentive-Based Environmental Regulation: A New Era from an Old Idea , 1990 .

[13]  H. Siebert.  Economics of the Environment: Theory and Policy , 1981 .