With increasing requirements for hydropower plant operation due to intermittent renewable energy sources like wind and solar, numerical simulations of transient operations in hydraulic turbo machines become more important. As a continuation of the work performed for the first workshop which covered three steady operating conditions, in the present paper load changes and a shutdown procedure are investigated. The findings of previous studies are used to create a 360° model and compare measurements with simulation results for the operating points part load, high load and best efficiency. A mesh motion procedure is introduced, allowing to represent moving guide vanes for load changes from best efficiency to part load and high load. Additionally an automated re-mesh procedure is added for turbine shutdown to ensure reliable mesh quality during guide vane closing. All three transient operations are compared to PIV velocity measurements in the draft tube and pressure signals in the vaneless space. Simulation results of axial velocity distributions for all three steady operation points, during both load changes and for the shutdown correlated well with the measurement. An offset at vaneless space pressure is found to be a result of guide vane corrections for the simulation to ensure similar velocity fields. Short-time Fourier transformation indicating increasing amplitudes and frequencies at speed-no load conditions. Further studies will discuss the already measured start-up procedure and investigate the necessity to consider the hydraulic system dynamics upstream of the turbine by means of a 1D3D coupling between the 3D flow field and a 1D system model.
[1]
M. Kemal Kiymik,et al.
Comparison of STFT and wavelet transform methods in determining epileptic seizure activity in EEG signals for real-time application
,
2005,
Comput. Biol. Medicine.
[2]
J Li,et al.
3D unsteady turbulent simulations of transients of the Francis turbine
,
2010
.
[3]
Alexander Jung,et al.
Investigation of different simulation approaches on a high-head Francis turbine and comparison with model test data: Francis-99
,
2015
.
[4]
Ole Gunnar Dahlhaug,et al.
Transient Pressure Measurements on a High Head Model Francis Turbine During Emergency Shutdown, Total Load Rejection, and Runaway
,
2014
.
[5]
Ole Gunnar Dahlhaug,et al.
Experimental Investigation of a High Head Francis Turbine During Spin-No-Load Operation
,
2015
.
[6]
Alexander Jung,et al.
Transient two-phase CFD simulation of overload operating conditions and load rejection in a prototype sized Francis turbine
,
2016
.
[7]
Chirag Trivedi,et al.
Numerical Techniques Applied to Hydraulic Turbines: A Perspective Review
,
2016
.
[8]
Michel J. Cervantes,et al.
Pressure measurements on a high-head Francis turbine during load acceptance and rejection
,
2014
.
[9]
J Nicolle,et al.
Transient CFD simulation of a Francis turbine startup
,
2012
.
[10]
Ole Gunnar Dahlhaug,et al.
Experimental and Numerical Studies for a High Head Francis Turbine at Several Operating Points
,
2013
.