Low-cost process monitoring for polymer extrusion

Polymer extrusion is regarded as an energy-intensive production process, and the real-time monitoring of both energy consumption and melt quality has become necessary to meet new carbon regulations and survive in the highly competitive plastics market. The use of a power meter is a simple and easy way to monitor energy, but the cost can sometimes be high. On the other hand, viscosity is regarded as one of the key indicators of melt quality in the polymer extrusion process. Unfortunately, viscosity cannot be measured directly using current sensory technology. The employment of on-line, in-line or off-line rheometers is sometimes useful, but these instruments either involve signal delay or cause flow restrictions to the extrusion process, which is obviously not suitable for real-time monitoring and control in practice. In this paper, simple and accurate real-time energy monitoring methods are developed. This is achieved by looking inside the controller, and using control variables to calculate the power consumption. For viscosity monitoring, a ‘soft-sensor’ approach based on an RBF neural network model is developed. The model is obtained through a two-stage selection and differential evolution, enabling compact and accurate solutions for viscosity monitoring. The proposed monitoring methods were tested and validated on a Killion KTS-100 extruder, and the experimental results show high accuracy compared with traditional monitoring approaches.

[1]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[2]  George W. Irwin,et al.  A fast nonlinear model identification method , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[3]  Kang Li,et al.  A two-stage algorithm for identification of nonlinear dynamic systems , 2006, Autom..

[4]  I ScottKirkpatrick Optimization by Simulated Annealing: Quantitative Studies , 1984 .

[5]  George W. Irwin,et al.  Two-stage RBF network construction based on particle swarm optimization , 2013 .

[6]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs , 1996, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[7]  Frederic Neil Cogswell,et al.  Polymer Melt Rheology: A Guide for Industrial Practice , 1981 .

[8]  E. C. Brown,et al.  The effect of screw geometry on melt temperature profile in single screw extrusion , 2006 .

[9]  R. Kent,et al.  Energy management in plastics processing — framework for measurement, assessment and prediction , 2008 .

[10]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 1995, Swarm Intelligence.

[11]  Martin Zatloukal,et al.  Analysis of entrance pressure drop techniques for extensional viscosity determination , 2009 .

[12]  Eugene Lai,et al.  Modeling of the plasticating process in a single‐screw extruder: A fast‐track approach , 2000 .

[13]  Jing Deng,et al.  Modelling the Effects of Operating Conditions on Motor Power Consumption in Single Screw Extrusion , 2010, LSMS/ICSEE.

[14]  Jing Deng,et al.  ‘Soft-sensor’ for real-time monitoring of melt viscosity in polymer extrusion process , 2010, 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[15]  Kang Li,et al.  Dynamic grey-box modeling for online monitoring of extrusion viscosity , 2012 .

[16]  Marion McAfee,et al.  A Soft Sensor for viscosity control of polymer extrusion , 2007, 2007 European Control Conference (ECC).

[17]  Subbu S. Venkatraman,et al.  A comparison of torsional and capillary rheometry for polymer melts: The Cox‐Merz rule revisited , 1990 .

[18]  Scott Kirkpatrick,et al.  Optimization by simulated annealing: Quantitative studies , 1984 .

[19]  Kang Li,et al.  Dynamic gray-box modeling for on-line monitoring of polymer extrusion viscosity , 2012 .

[20]  Zong Woo Geem,et al.  A New Heuristic Optimization Algorithm: Harmony Search , 2001, Simul..