5. STATE-OF-THE-ART FOR PRECIPITATION-RUNOFF MODELLING

Precipitation-runoff (P-R) models that aim at predicting streamflow from the knowledge of precipitation over a catchment can be used for a wide range of applications to serve engineers and water managers in water related studies. This modelling exercise has received increasing attention since the end of the 50s, aided by the development of computing capacity. There is today a plethora of existing models but fully satisfactory solutions do not seem to have been found. No consensus exists today on how a P-R model should be developed, selected, assessed or implemented, although a huge amount of scientific papers provide methodologies to partly answer these questions. A few attempts were made to provide recommendations in the development and practical use of P-R models, especially for very simple models. But it seems that no comprehensive guideline devoted specifically to P-R simulation models exists today. However, many practical documents are available today that can be easily transferred/adapted to this modelling domain. The abundant scientific literature as well as previous comparative evaluation studies will also help to improve quality assurance procedures in the context of the HarmoniQuA project. Some aspects of these procedures may however depend on the type of practical application of the P-R model. 5.1 Definition of precipitation-runoff domain Precipitation-runoff (P-R) modelling attempts to establish a link between precipitation measured over the catchment and runoff (streamflow) observed at the considered outlet. The modelled system is the catchment, that is often considered as an adequate study unit for researchers and water stakeholders. The meteorological input denoted under the general term precipitation can be either rainfall or snowfall, grossly depending on air temperature conditions. Although precipitation and runoff can be considered as surface waters, the transformation of the first into the second at the catchment scale integrates many hydrological processes (such as interception, evapotranspiration, sub-surface flow, groundwater recharge, channel routing etc.), of which the most important take place underground (Beven, 2001). Today P-R models can be implemented in an operational context for many applications of hydrological engineering (e.g. water works design) and water resources management (e.g. floods or low flows forecasting, reservoir management). Because it focuses on the catchment, P-R modelling occupies a crucial place in water related studies. In the context of the HarmoniQuA project, it has therefore links with other domains. First, since the catchment cannot be considered as an impervious body and because there are exchanges between ground and surface waters, P-R is related to the groundwater domain. Second, in the context of the Water Framework Directive that focuses mainly on water quality issues, P-R modelling is important since a satisfactory

[1]  V. Koren,et al.  Lumped and Semi-distributed Modeling using NEXRAD Stage-III Data: Results from Continuous Multi-year Simulations , 1999 .

[2]  A. Jakeman,et al.  A comparison of metric and conceptual approaches in rainfall‐runoff modeling and its implications , 2001 .

[3]  R. Moore,et al.  Hierarchical testing of three rainfall-runoff models in small forested catchments , 1999 .

[4]  Keith Beven,et al.  Uncertainty and equifinality in calibrating distributed roughness coefficients in a flood propagation model with limited data , 1998 .

[5]  M. Franchini,et al.  Comparative analysis of several conceptual rainfall-runoff models , 1991 .

[6]  T. McMahon,et al.  Application of the daily rainfall-runoff model MODHYDROLOG to 28 Australian catchments , 1994 .

[7]  R. Horton An Approach Toward a Physical Interpretation of Infiltration-Capacity1 , 1941 .

[8]  C. Michel,et al.  Flood forecasting with a watershed model: a new method of parameter updating , 2000 .

[9]  Xxyyzz,et al.  Flood-Runoff Analysis , 1997 .

[10]  M. G. Anderson,et al.  DATA-BASED MECHANISTIC MODELLING AND VALIDATION OF RAINFALL-FLOW PROCESSES , 2001 .

[11]  Pierre Perrault De l'origine des fontaines , 1972 .

[12]  R. Clarke A review of some mathematical models used in hydrology, with observations on their calibration and use , 1973 .

[13]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[14]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Comparison of simple versus complex distributed runoff models on a midsized semiarid watershed , 1994 .

[15]  J. Refsgaard,et al.  Operational Validation and Intercomparison of Different Types of Hydrological Models , 1996 .

[16]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: sensitivity to calibration data , 1996 .

[17]  R. Mein,et al.  Sensitivity of optimized parameters in watershed models , 1978 .

[18]  C. T. Haan,et al.  VARIABILITY OF OPTIMIZED PARAMETER ESTIMATES BASED ON OBSERVED RECORD LENGTH , 1991 .

[19]  A. Falkland Hydrology and water resources of small islands: a practical guide. , 1991 .

[20]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall‐runoff models , 1992 .

[21]  Tawatchai Tingsanchali,et al.  Application of tank, NAM, ARMA and neural network models to flood forecasting , 2000 .

[22]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Evaluation of Maximum Likelihood Parameter estimation techniques for conceptual rainfall‐runoff models: Influence of calibration data variability and length on model credibility , 1983 .

[23]  Keith Beven,et al.  Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling , 1993 .

[24]  Denis A. Hughes,et al.  Evaluating the performance of a deterministic daily rainfall–runoff model in a low-flow context , 1998 .

[25]  Nilo Nascimento,et al.  GR3J: a daily watershed model with three free parameters , 1999 .

[26]  C. Perrin,et al.  Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments , 2001 .

[27]  George Kuczera,et al.  Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: the Metropolis algorithm , 1998 .

[28]  Alekseĭ Aleksandrovich d-r geogr. nauk Sokolov,et al.  Methods for water balance computations : an international guide for research and practice , 1974 .

[29]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  National Weather Service River Forecast System (NWSRFS). , 2002 .

[30]  Michael J. Stewardson,et al.  Comparison of six rainfall-runoff modelling approaches , 1993 .

[31]  J. L. Kittle,et al.  Hydrological simulation program: Fortran. User's manual for release 10 , 1993 .

[32]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Toward improved streamflow forecasts: value of semidistributed modeling , 2001 .

[33]  R. Beverton,et al.  Institute of Hydrology , 1972, Nature.

[34]  V. Klemeš,et al.  Operational Testing of Hydrological Simulation Models , 2022 .

[35]  Jens Christian Refsgaard,et al.  Validation and Intercomparison of Different Updating Procedures for Real-Time Forecasting , 1997 .