In vivo comparison of working length determination with two electronic apex locators.

AIM To compare the accuracy of two electronic apex locators (EALs) in the same teeth in vivo. METHODOLOGY The working lengths in 20 teeth with a single canal were determined with two different EALs (Root ZX; J. Morita Corporation, Tokyo, Japan and Raypex 5 VDW, Munich, Germany) before extraction. When the first EAL was used the files were advanced until the display indicated the 'apical constriction'. The files were then fixed in removable and replaceable light curing composite patterns. The procedure was repeated in the same tooth with the second EAL and a different file. The teeth were then extracted and the apical 4 mm of the root canals were exposed. After that the apical parts with the repositioned files in the canals were digitally photographed under a light microscope. On the images the minor diameter and the major foramen of each sample were marked and the respective distances of the file tips from these positions were measured with a computer program. Subsequently the values of the two groups of EALs were compared using a paired sample t-test. RESULTS The minor foramen was located within the limits of +/-0.5 mm in 75% of the cases with the Root ZX and in 80% of the cases with Raypex 5. The paired sample t-test showed no significant difference between the EALs regarding determination of the minor foramen. CONCLUSION The use of EALs is a reliable method for determining working length. The differences between the two EALs were not statistically significant.

[1]  T Attin,et al.  Ex vivo comparison of two electronic apex locators with different scales and frequencies. , 2005, International endodontic journal.

[2]  R. Hickel,et al.  Accuracy of electronic apex locators in comparison to actual length--an in vivo study. , 2005, Journal of dentistry.

[3]  J. Marshall,et al.  An evaluation of root ZX and elements diagnostic apex locators. , 2005, Journal of endodontics.

[4]  N P Chandler,et al.  Electronic apex locators. , 2004, International endodontic journal.

[5]  T Attin,et al.  The accuracy of electronic working length determination. , 2004, International endodontic journal.

[6]  Euiseong Kim,et al.  Electronic apex locator. , 2004, Dental clinics of North America.

[7]  J. Marshall,et al.  An in vivo comparison of two frequency-based electronic apex locators. , 2003, Journal of endodontics.

[8]  A. Kielbassa,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the measuring accuracy of ROOT ZX in primary teeth. , 2003, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[9]  H. Steiman,et al.  The influence of sodium hypochlorite irrigation on the accuracy of the Root ZX electronic apex locator. , 2002, Journal of endodontics.

[10]  Fernando Goldberg,et al.  In vitro measurement accuracy of an electronic apex locator in teeth with simulated apical root resorption. , 2002, Journal of endodontics.

[11]  Oliver Stamm,et al.  Influence of the canal contents on the electrical assisted determination of the length of root canals. , 2002, Journal of endodontics.

[12]  W A Walker,et al.  An in vitro evaluation of the accuracy of the root ZX in the presence of various irrigants. , 2001, Journal of endodontics.

[13]  K Langeland,et al.  Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 2. A histological study. , 2002, International endodontic journal.

[14]  T. Baccetti,et al.  A SEM study of in vivo accuracy of the Root ZX electronic apex locator. , 1998, Journal of endodontics.

[15]  E A BeGole,et al.  An in vivo evaluation of an electronic apex locator that uses the ratio method in vital and necrotic canals. , 1998, Journal of endodontics.

[16]  L Vajrabhaya,et al.  Accuracy of apex locator. , 1997, Endodontics & dental traumatology.

[17]  S Shabahang,et al.  An in vivo evaluation of Root ZX electronic apex locator. , 1996, Journal of endodontics.

[18]  S. Friedman,et al.  Electronic length measurement using small and large files in enlarged canals. , 1996, International endodontic journal.

[19]  F Lutz,et al.  An in vivo comparison of gradient and absolute impedance electronic apex locators. , 1996, Journal of endodontics.

[20]  D. H. Pratten,et al.  Comparison of radiographic and electronic working lengths. , 1996, Journal of endodontics.

[21]  I J Soares,et al.  In vitro evaluation of an audiometric device in locating the apical foramen of teeth. , 1994, Endodontics & dental traumatology.

[22]  A L Frank,et al.  An in vivo evaluation of Endex electronic apex locator. , 1993, Journal of endodontics.

[23]  P M Dummer,et al.  The position and topography of the apical canal constriction and apical foramen. , 1984, International endodontic journal.

[24]  F. Pineda,et al.  Mesiodistal and buccolingual roentgenographic investigation of 7,275 root canals. , 1972, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.