Decision fusion rules based on multi-bit knowledge of local sensors in wireless sensor networks

For Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) with a small quantity of sensors and very low SNR, distributed detection and decision fusion rules based on multi-bit knowledge of local sensors are proposed. At local sensors, observations are quantized to multi-bit local decisions. Three quantification algorithms are investigated, which are based on weight, statistics and redundancy, respectively. Corresponding suboptimal fusion rules at the fusion center are also discussed by approximating the optimal likelihood ratio test. System level detection performance measures, namely probabilities of detection and false alarm, are derived analytically by employing probability theory. Finally, Monte Carlo methods are employed to study the performance of proposed decision fusion rules with parameters such as Rayleigh fading channel and Gaussian noise. Numerical results show that, under non-ideal channel, commonly used schemes based on weight cannot improve the system performance even with a large number and high SNR. Fortunately, schemes based on statistics and redundancy can enhance the system capability when the node is deficient and SNR is low. Furthermore, schemes based on statistics have the best stability among the three schemes, and schemes based on redundancy have the best performance among the three when quantization degree is high.

[1]  Sun Youxian,et al.  Decision Fusion Under Fading Channel in Resource-Constrained Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007 .

[2]  Peter Willett,et al.  On the optimality of the likelihood-ratio test for local sensor decision rules in the presence of nonideal channels , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[3]  Alexei Makarenko,et al.  Decentralized Bayesian algorithms for active sensor networks , 2006, Inf. Fusion.

[4]  A.M.A. Aziz,et al.  Optimum data fusion rules in distributed sensor detection systems , 2005, Proceedings of the Twenty-Second National Radio Science Conference, 2005. NRSC 2005..

[5]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Decision fusion in a wireless sensor network with a random number of sensors , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..

[6]  José M. F. Moura,et al.  Fusion in sensor networks with communication constraints , 2004, Third International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2004. IPSN 2004.

[7]  Ke Liu,et al.  Type-Based Decentralized Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[8]  Jun Fang,et al.  Distributed Adaptive Quantization and Estimation for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, IEEE Signal Process. Lett..

[9]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Fusion of decisions transmitted over Rayleigh fading channels in wireless sensor networks , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[10]  Venugopal V. Veeravalli,et al.  Decentralized detection in sensor networks , 2003, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[11]  P.K. Varshney,et al.  Decision fusion rules in multi-hop wireless sensor networks , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[12]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Distributed detection in a large wireless sensor network , 2006, Inf. Fusion.

[13]  Hairong Qi,et al.  Distributed computing paradigms for collaborative signal and information processing in sensor networks , 2004, J. Parallel Distributed Comput..

[14]  Yücel Altunbasak,et al.  Parallel distributed detection for wireless sensor networks: performance analysis and design , 2005, GLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005..

[15]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Wireless sensor networks: a survey , 2002, Comput. Networks.

[16]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Decision Fusion Rules in Wireless Sensor Networks Using Fading Channel Statistics , 2003 .