Installed Performance Assessment of an Array of Distributed Propulsors Ingesting Boundary Layer Flow

Conventional propulsion systems are typically represented as uninstalled system to suit the simple separation between airframe and engine in a podded configuration. However, boundary layer ingesting systems are inherently integrated, and require a different perspective for performance analysis. Simulations of boundary layer ingesting propulsions systems must represent the change in inlet flow characteristics which result from different local flow conditions. In addition, a suitable accounting system is required to split the airframe forces from the propulsion system forces. The research assesses the performance of a conceptual vehicle which applies a boundary layer ingesting propulsion system NASA’s N3-X blended wing body aircraft as a case study. The performance of the aircraft’s distributed propulsor array is assessed using a performance method which accounts for installation terms resulting from the boundary layer ingesting nature of the system. A ‘thrust split’ option is considered which splits the source of thrust between the aircraft’s main turbojet engines and the distributed propulsor array. An optimum thrust split for a specific fuel consumption at design point is found to occur for a thrust split value of 94.1%. In comparison, the optimum thrust split with respect to fuel consumption for the design 7500 nmi mission is found to be 93.6%, leading to a 1.5% fuel saving for the configuration considered. ∗Address all correspondence to this author.

[1]  Ian A. Waitz,et al.  The historical fuel efficiency characteristics of regional aircraft from technological, operational, and cost perspectives , 2002 .

[2]  Pericles Pilidis,et al.  Performance Assessment of a Boundary Layer Ingesting Distributed Propulsion System at Off-Design , 2017 .

[3]  Olivier Atinault,et al.  Exergy-Based Formulation for Aircraft Aeropropulsive Performance Assessment: Theoretical Development , 2015 .

[4]  Periklis Lolis Development of a Preliminary Weight Estimation Method for Advanced Turbofan Engines , 2014 .

[5]  Gerald V. Brown,et al.  An Examination of the Effect of Boundary Layer Ingestion on Turboelectric Distributed Propulsion Systems , 2011 .

[6]  Riti Singh,et al.  Challenges of future aircraft propulsion: A review of distributed propulsion technology and its potential application for the all electric commercial aircraft , 2011 .

[7]  Gregory Tillman,et al.  Aircraft System Study of Boundary Layer Ingesting Propulsion , 2012 .

[8]  Stroemungen Turbulente,et al.  Boundary Layer Theory: Part 2 Turbulent Flows , 2013 .

[9]  M. Drela Power Balance in Aerodynamic Flows , 2009 .

[10]  Gerald V. Brown,et al.  Turboelectric Distributed Propulsion in a Hybrid Wing Body Aircraft , 2011 .

[11]  Daniel Crichton,et al.  Engine And Installation Configurations For A Silent Aircraft , 2005 .

[12]  Panagiotis Laskaridis,et al.  Methodology to assess the performance of an aircraft concept with distributed propulsion and boundary layer ingestion using a parametric approach , 2015 .

[13]  James L. Felder,et al.  Control Volume Analysis of Boundary Layer Ingesting Propulsion Systems With or Without Shock Wave Ahead of the Inlet , 2011 .

[14]  Pericles Pilidis,et al.  Installed performance assessment of a boundary layer ingesting distributed propulsion system at design point , 2016 .

[15]  Tom Hynes,et al.  Performance of a Boundary Layer Ingesting (BLI) propulsion system , 2007 .

[16]  H. Fernholz Boundary Layer Theory , 2001 .

[17]  Gerald V. Brown,et al.  Turboelectric Distributed Propulsion Engine Cycle Analysis for Hybrid-Wing-Body Aircraft , 2009 .

[18]  Howard E. Roberts,et al.  The Jet Airplane Utilizing Boundary Layer Air for Propulsion , 1947 .

[19]  Gerald V. Brown,et al.  Weights and Efficiencies of Electric Components of a Turboelectric Aircraft Propulsion System , 2011 .

[20]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  MDO of a Blended-Wing-Body Transport Aircraft with Distributed Propulsion , 2003 .