The new argonauts: The international migration of venture‐backed companies

We use a novel longitudinal dataset, constructed from 16 downloads of VentureXpert records collected over 20 years, to characterize the international migration of venture‐capital‐backed startups. We find that: (i) 1078 firms in our sample (1.4%) migrate; (ii) countries with high levels of in‐migration also have high levels of out‐migration; (iii) migrating firms move to places with more investors; (iv) pre‐move investors and their connections most strongly predict migration patterns; and (v) movers raise more money than non‐movers, primarily from investors at their destinations. Overall, these patterns appear inconsistent with those expected if startups move primarily in search of talent or customers. Instead, the flows across countries look more like international trade, with startups seeking capital, and social connections between investors defining the shipping lanes.Although many high‐profile startups have relocated their headquarters from one country to another, systematic information on this phenomenon has been scarce. How frequently do these moves happen? Why do startups move? Over 20 years, we have built a database that can begin to answer these questions. International moves appear rare. When startups do move, they tend to move to places with more venture capital, particularly when their existing investors have connections in those places. Movers, moreover, raise more money than non‐movers, mostly from investors in their destination countries. Capital availability, rather than access to talent or proximity to customers, appears to be the strongest predictor of startup migration.

[1]  Jorge Guzman Go West Young Firm: The Impact of Startup Migration on the Performance of Migrants , 2023, Management Science.

[2]  Russell J. Funk,et al.  FROM MASS TO MOTION: CONCEPTUALIZING AND MEASURING THE DYNAMICS OF INDUSTRY CLUSTERS , 2021, Strategic Management Journal.

[3]  I. Lee Startups, relocation, and firm performance: a transaction cost economics perspective , 2020, Small Business Economics.

[4]  Siobhan O’Mahony,et al.  What is a pivot? Explaining when and how entrepreneurial firms decide to make strategic change and pivot , 2020 .

[5]  L. Piscitello,et al.  Location and survival of MNEs' subsidiaries: Agglomeration and heterogeneity of firms , 2019, Strategic Management Journal.

[6]  A. Conti,et al.  What Is the US Comparative Advantage in Entrepreneurship? Evidence from Israeli Migration to the United States , 2019, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[7]  E. Oster Unobservable Selection and Coefficient Stability: Theory and Evidence , 2019 .

[8]  J. Shaver Headquarters Economy , 2018, Oxford Scholarship Online.

[9]  William R. Kerr,et al.  Immigrant Entrepreneurship in America: Evidence from the Survey of Business Owners 2007 & 2012 , 2018, Research Policy.

[10]  Johan P. Larsson,et al.  Location Choices of Graduate Entrepreneurs , 2017 .

[11]  David M. Waguespack,et al.  Temporal Issues in Replication: The Stability of Centrality-Based Advantage , 2017 .

[12]  Ilya A. Strebulaev,et al.  The Economic Impact of Venture Capital: Evidence from Public Companies , 2015 .

[13]  Henri L. F. de Groot,et al.  The consumer city , 2015 .

[14]  Nicholas Kalaitzandonakes,et al.  Location choice of academic entrepreneurs: Evidence from the US biotechnology industry , 2015 .

[15]  Scott Stern,et al.  Where is Silicon Valley? , 2015, Science.

[16]  Richard R. Townsend,et al.  The Impact of Venture Capital Monitoring , 2014 .

[17]  Karl Wennberg,et al.  Regional Influences on the Prevalence of Family Versus Non-Family Start-Ups , 2013 .

[18]  Olav Sorenson,et al.  The Social Attachment to Place , 2010 .

[19]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The future of public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital , 2010 .

[20]  Olav Sorenson,et al.  Home Sweet Home: Entrepreneurs' Location Choices and the Performance of Their Ventures , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[21]  Olav Sorenson,et al.  The embedded entrepreneur , 2009 .

[22]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Venture Capital, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Growth , 2009, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[23]  Claudio Michelacci,et al.  Why So Many Local Entrepreneurs? , 2006, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[24]  Silvana Tenreyro,et al.  The Log of Gravity , 2004, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[25]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  The geography of opportunity: spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms , 2003 .

[26]  Jonathan Eaton,et al.  Technology, Geography, and Trade , 2002 .

[27]  Octávio Figueiredo,et al.  Home-field advantage: location decisions of Portuguese entrepreneurs , 2002 .

[28]  Fredrick Flyer,et al.  Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States , 2000 .

[29]  Pino G. Audia,et al.  The Social Structure of Entrepreneurial Activity: Geographic Concentration of Footwear Production in the United States, 1940–19891 , 2000, American Journal of Sociology.

[30]  Christopher R. Taber,et al.  Selection on Observed and Unobserved Variables: Assessing the Effectiveness of Catholic Schools , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[31]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Syndication Networks and the Spatial Distribution of Venture Capital Investments1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  The Competitive Advantage of Nations. , 1990 .

[33]  Garth Saloner,et al.  Competition and Human Capital Accumulation: a Theory of Interregional Specialization and Trade , 1990 .

[34]  Gerald A. Carlino,et al.  Contrasts in Agglomeration: New York and Pittsburgh Reconsidered , 1980 .

[35]  G. Zipf The P 1 P 2 D Hypothesis: On the Intercity Movement of Persons , 1946 .

[36]  M. Feldman The New Economics Of Innovation, Spillovers And Agglomeration: Areview Of Empirical Studies , 1999 .

[37]  Paul M. Romer,et al.  Growth Based on Increasing Returns Due to Specialization , 1987 .