Laboratory observations of permeability enhancement by fluid pressure oscillation of in situ fractured rock

Received 5 June 2010; revised 5 November 2010; accepted 22 December 2010; published 24 February 2011. [1] We report on laboratory experiments designed to investigate the influence of pore pressure oscillations on the effective permeability of fractured rock. Berea sandstone samples were fractured in situ under triaxial stresses of tens of megapascals, and deionized water was forced through the incipient fracture under conditions of steady and oscillating pore pressure. We find that short‐term pore pressure oscillations induce long‐term transient increases in effective permeability of the fractured samples. The magnitude of the effective permeability enhancements scales with the amplitude of pore pressure oscillations, and changes persist well after the stress perturbation. The maximum value of effective permeability enhancement is 5 × 10 −16 m 2 with a background permeability of 1 × 10 −15 m 2 ; that is, the maximum enhanced permeability is 1.5 × 10 −15 m 2 . We evaluate poroelastic effects and show that hydraulic storage release does not explain our observations. Effective permeability recovery following dynamic oscillations occurs as the inverse square root of time. The recovery indicates that a reversible mechanism, such as clogging/unclogging of fractures, as opposed to an irreversible one, like microfracturing, is responsible for the transient effective permeability increase. Our work suggests the feasibility of dynamically controlling the effective permeability of fractured systems. The result has consequences for models of earthquake triggering and permeability enhancement in fault zones due to dynamic shaking from near and distant earthquakes.

[1]  R. Gottlob,et al.  Methods and Results , 1986 .

[2]  D. Elsworth,et al.  Healing of simulated fault gouges aided by pressure solution: Results from rock analogue experiments , 2008 .

[3]  M. Zoback,et al.  How faulting keeps the crust strong , 2000 .

[4]  R. W. Coble The Effects of the Alaskan Earthquake of March 27, 1964, on Ground Water in lowa , 1965 .

[5]  J. Bear Hydraulics of Groundwater , 1979 .

[6]  Peter M. Roberts,et al.  Elastic wave stimulation of oil reservoirs: Promising EOR technology? , 2003 .

[7]  David R. Shelly,et al.  Migrating tremors illuminate complex deformation beneath the seismogenic San Andreas fault , 2010, Nature.

[8]  D. Agnew,et al.  Seismic waves increase permeability , 2006, Nature.

[9]  Paul Bodin,et al.  Widespread Triggering of Nonvolcanic Tremor in California , 2008, Science.

[10]  James D. Byerlee,et al.  An earthquake mechanism based on rapid sealing of faults , 1992, Nature.

[11]  C. Scholz,et al.  Healing and sealing of a simulated fault gouge under hydrothermal conditions: Implications for fault healing , 1998 .

[12]  M. Biot THEORY OF DEFORMATION OF A POROUS VISCOELASTIC ANISOTROPIC SOLID , 1956 .

[13]  K. Felzer,et al.  Decay of aftershock density with distance indicates triggering by dynamic stress , 2006, Nature.

[14]  D. Vokrouhlický,et al.  Seismic Triggering of Eruptions in the Far Field : Volcanoes and Geysers , 2006 .

[15]  D. Elsworth,et al.  Shear-induced dilatancy of fluid-saturated faults: Experiment and theory , 2009 .

[16]  E. Brodsky,et al.  Response of streamflow to multiple earthquakes , 2003 .

[17]  D. Elsworth,et al.  Influence of shear and deviatoric stress on the evolution of permeability in fractured rock , 2009 .

[18]  R. Muir-Wood,et al.  Hydrological signatures of earthquake strain , 1993 .

[19]  I. Main,et al.  Fault sealing during deformation-band growth in porous sandstone , 2000 .

[20]  S. Cox,et al.  Evolution of strength recovery and permeability during fluid–rock reaction in experimental fault zones , 2002 .

[21]  S. Hickman,et al.  Healing of microcracks in quartz: Implications for fluid flow , 1990 .

[22]  Noriaki Watanabe,et al.  Direct measurement of contact area and stress dependence of anisotropic flow through rock fracture with heterogeneous aperture distribution , 2009 .

[23]  S. Cox,et al.  Cohesive strengthening of fault zones during the interseismic period: An experimental study , 2006 .

[24]  B. Evans,et al.  Laboratory study of fault healing and lithification in simulated fault gouge under hydrothermal conditions , 1997 .

[25]  E. Brodsky,et al.  New constraints on mechanisms of remotely triggered seismicity at Long Valley Caldera , 2005 .

[26]  R. M. Roberts,et al.  Flow dimensions corresponding to hydrogeologic conditions , 2003 .

[27]  J. Barker A generalized radial flow model for hydraulic tests in fractured rock , 1988 .

[28]  Michael Manga,et al.  A mechanism for sustained groundwater pressure changes induced by distant earthquakes , 2003 .

[29]  Steven H. Wolf,et al.  Permeability changes associated with large earthquakes: an example from Loma Prieta , 1992 .

[30]  W. Ellsworth,et al.  Seismicity Remotely Triggered by the Magnitude 7.3 Landers, California, Earthquake , 1993, Science.

[31]  J. Vidale,et al.  Non-volcanic tremor driven by large transient shear stresses , 2007, Nature.

[32]  Igor A. Beresnev,et al.  Elastic-wave stimulation of oil production; a review of methods and results , 1994 .