Disentangling social interactions and environmental drivers in multi-individual wildlife tracking data

While many animal species exhibit strong conspecific interactions, movement analyses of wildlife tracking datasets still largely focus on single individuals. Multi-individual wildlife tracking studies provide new opportunities to explore how individuals move relative to one another, but such datasets are frequently too sparse for the detailed, acceleration-based analytical methods typically employed in collective motion studies. Here, we address the methodological gap between wildlife tracking data and collective motion by developing a general method for quantifying movement correlation from sparsely sampled data. Unlike most existing techniques for studying the non-independence of individual movements with wildlife tracking data, our approach is derived from an analytically tractable stochastic model of correlated movement. Our approach partitions correlation into a deterministic tendency to move in the same direction termed ‘drift correlation’ and a stochastic component called ‘diffusive correlation’. These components suggest the mechanisms that coordinate movements, with drift correlation indicating external influences, and diffusive correlation pointing to social interactions. We use two case studies to highlight the ability of our approach both to quantify correlated movements in tracking data and to suggest the mechanisms that generate the correlation. First, we use an abrupt change in movement correlation to pinpoint the onset of spring migration in barren-ground caribou. Second, we show how spatial proximity mediates intermittently correlated movements among khulans in the Gobi desert. We conclude by discussing the linkages of our approach to the theory of collective motion. This article is part of the theme issue 'Collective movement ecology'.

[1]  Anna Skarin,et al.  Modeling interdependent animal movement in continuous time , 2016, Biometrics.

[2]  Trisalyn A Nelson,et al.  A critical examination of indices of dynamic interaction for wildlife telemetry studies. , 2014, The Journal of animal ecology.

[3]  Lucas N Joppa,et al.  Understanding movement data and movement processes: current and emerging directions. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[4]  I. Couzin,et al.  Inferring the structure and dynamics of interactions in schooling fish , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  I. Couzin,et al.  Emergent Sensing of Complex Environments by Mobile Animal Groups , 2013, Science.

[6]  Colin J Torney,et al.  Inferring the rules of social interaction in migrating caribou , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[8]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .

[9]  C H Fleming,et al.  Estimating where and how animals travel: an optimal framework for path reconstruction from autocorrelated tracking data. , 2015, Ecology.

[10]  I. Couzin Collective minds , 2007, Nature.

[11]  Peter Leimgruber,et al.  From Fine-Scale Foraging to Home Ranges: A Semivariance Approach to Identifying Movement Modes across Spatiotemporal Scales , 2014, The American Naturalist.

[12]  I. Couzin,et al.  Shared decision-making drives collective movement in wild baboons , 2015, Science.

[13]  Iain D Couzin,et al.  From single steps to mass migration: the problem of scale in the movement ecology of the Serengeti wildebeest , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  Andrew M Simons,et al.  Many wrongs: the advantage of group navigation. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[15]  Bernard Cazelles,et al.  Analysing multiple time series and extending significance testing in wavelet analysis , 2008 .

[16]  Eliezer Gurarie,et al.  Characteristic Spatial and Temporal Scales Unify Models of Animal Movement , 2011, The American Naturalist.

[17]  P. Kaczensky,et al.  The Danger of Having All Your Eggs in One Basket—Winter Crash of the Re-Introduced Przewalski's Horses in the Mongolian Gobi , 2011, PloS one.

[18]  Leo Polansky,et al.  A framework for understanding the architecture of collective movements using pairwise analyses of animal movement data , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[19]  V. Guttal,et al.  Friendship across species borders: factors that facilitate and constrain heterospecific sociality , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  Roland Langrock,et al.  Modelling group dynamic animal movement , 2013, 1308.5850.

[21]  E A Codling,et al.  Group navigation and the "many-wrongs principle" in models of animal movement. , 2007, Ecology.

[22]  Peter Leimgruber,et al.  Non‐Markovian maximum likelihood estimation of autocorrelated movement processes , 2014 .

[23]  Correction to ‘Migration in the Anthropocene: how collective navigation, environmental system and taxonomy shape the vulnerability of migratory species’ , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  Leo Polansky,et al.  From moonlight to movement and synchronized randomness: Fourier and wavelet analyses of animal location time series data. , 2010, Ecology.

[25]  N. Bunnefeld,et al.  A model-driven approach to quantify migration patterns: individual, regional and yearly differences. , 2011, The Journal of animal ecology.

[26]  Eliezer Gurarie,et al.  A statistical framework for inferring the influence of conspecifics on movement behaviour , 2014 .

[27]  Devin S Johnson,et al.  Continuous-time correlated random walk model for animal telemetry data. , 2008, Ecology.

[28]  Eliezer Gurarie,et al.  A novel method for identifying behavioural changes in animal movement data. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[29]  H. Wehrden,et al.  Resource selection by sympatric wild equids in the Mongolian Gobi , 2008 .

[30]  Nikolai W F Bode,et al.  Distinguishing Social from Nonsocial Navigation in Moving Animal Groups , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[31]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  Detecting collective behaviour in animal relocation data, with application to migrating caribou , 2016 .

[32]  Robert G. White,et al.  The porcupine caribou herd , 2002 .

[33]  Iain D Couzin,et al.  Synchronization, coordination and collective sensing during thermalling flight of freely migrating white storks , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  J. Calabrese,et al.  How landscape dynamics link individual‐ to population‐level movement patterns: a multispecies comparison of ungulate relocation data , 2011 .

[35]  Andrew M. Hein,et al.  Challenges and solutions for studying collective animal behaviour in the wild , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  S. G. Fancy,et al.  Seasonal movements of caribou in arctic Alaska as determined by satellite , 1989 .

[37]  Daniel Sheldon,et al.  Kálmán filters for continuous-time movement models , 2017, Ecol. Informatics.

[38]  Eliezer Gurarie,et al.  What is the animal doing? Tools for exploring behavioural structure in animal movements. , 2016, The Journal of animal ecology.

[39]  Francesca Cagnacci,et al.  A framework for modelling range shifts and migrations: asking when, whither, whether and will it return , 2017, The Journal of animal ecology.

[40]  E. Revilla,et al.  A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Edward A. Codling,et al.  Collective animal navigation and migratory culture: from theoretical models to empirical evidence , 2017, bioRxiv.

[42]  Christen H. Fleming,et al.  A new kernel density estimator for accurate home‐range and species‐range area estimation , 2017 .