Improving short‐range high‐resolution model precipitation forecast skill using time‐lagged ensembles

High-resolution forecasts can vary considerably from run to run. Excessive inconsistency is undesirable, especially for the forecaster, who seeks similarities between successive runs to gain confidence in model guidance. The Met Office 4 km Unified Model runs every 6 h to t + 36 h. Five-member time-lag ensembles are created for the most recent 6 h period in order to study the perceived inconsistencies between runs. Mean, maximum, and probability-of-precipitation forecast fields are generated, for four different months of operational forecasts chosen to capture different seasonal weather regimes, and compared with the verifying radar accumulation. Each of the individual forecasts (ensemble members) is evaluated and its contribution to the ensemble assessed. Results show that the time-lag ensemble performs better at or near the grid scale, and that there is a strong case for recalibration. Indeed, the ensemble approach ensures that the proportion of missed forecast events (which have potentially more serious implication for high-impact weather) is reduced. In short, the effect of the lagged-ensemble spread is similar to that of the spread created from perturbed initial conditions in conventional ensembles, improving forecast skill at a higher spatial resolution, thus emulating the requirement for spatial averaging for a single deterministic forecast. Overall, improved forecast skill at longer ranges ensures that time-lagged ensembles are now a more viable option than in the past. © Crown Copyright 2007. Reproduced with the permission of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  P. Rowntree,et al.  A Mass Flux Convection Scheme with Representation of Cloud Ensemble Characteristics and Stability-Dependent Closure , 1990 .

[2]  B. Golding Nimrod: a system for generating automated very short range forecasts , 1998 .

[3]  A. Lorenc,et al.  The Met Office global four‐dimensional variational data assimilation scheme , 2007 .

[4]  A. Slingo,et al.  Studies with a flexible new radiation code. I: Choosing a configuration for a large-scale model , 1996 .

[5]  Damian R. Wilson,et al.  A microphysically based precipitation scheme for the UK meteorological office unified model , 1999 .

[6]  Chungu Lu,et al.  Short-Range Numerical Weather Prediction Using Time-Lagged Ensembles , 2007 .

[7]  E. Lorenz Atmospheric Predictability as Revealed by Naturally Occurring Analogues , 1969 .

[8]  R. Treadon,et al.  A Tutorial on Lateral Boundary Conditions as a Basic and Potentially Serious Limitation to Regional Numerical Weather Prediction , 1997 .

[9]  Jun Du,et al.  Short-Range Ensemble Forecasting of Quantitative Precipitation , 1997 .

[10]  K. Droegemeier,et al.  Multiresolution Ensemble Forecasts of an Observed Tornadic Thunderstorm System. Part I: Comparsion of Coarse- and Fine-Grid Experiments , 2006 .

[11]  Dawn Harrison,et al.  Improving precipitation estimates from weather radar using quality control and correction techniques , 2000 .

[12]  Marion Mittermaier,et al.  Using an intensity‐scale technique to assess the added benefit of high‐resolution model precipitation forecasts , 2006 .

[13]  G. Martin,et al.  A New Boundary Layer Mixing Scheme. Part I: Scheme Description and Single-Column Model Tests , 2000 .

[14]  A. Staniforth,et al.  A new dynamical core for the Met Office's global and regional modelling of the atmosphere , 2005 .

[15]  Charles A. Doswell,et al.  On the Use of Mesoscale and Cloud-Scale Models in Operational Forecasting , 1992 .

[16]  Kenneth J. Westrick,et al.  Does Increasing Horizontal Resolution Produce More Skillful Forecasts , 2002 .

[17]  N. Roberts,et al.  Scale-Selective Verification of Rainfall Accumulations from High-Resolution Forecasts of Convective Events , 2008 .