Local extinction and turnover rates at the edge and interior of species' ranges

One hypothesis for the maintenance of the edge of a species' range suggests that more central (and abundant) populations are relatively stable and edge populations are less stable with increased local extinction and turnover rates. To date, estimates of such metrics are equivocal due to design and analysis flaws. Apparent increased estimates of extinction and turnover rates at the edge of range, versus the interior, could be a function of decreased detection probabilities alone, and not of a biological process. We estimated extinction and turnover rates for species at the interiors and edges of their ranges using an approach which incorporates potential heterogeneity in species detection probabilities. Extinction rates were higher at the edges (0.17 ′ 0.03 [SE]) than in the interiors (0.04 ′ 0.01), as was turnover. Without taking the probability of detection into account these differences would be artificially magnified. Knowledge of extinction and turnover rates is essential in furthering our understanding of range dynamics, and in directing conservation efforts. This study further illustrates the practical application of methods proposed recently for estimating extinction rates and other community dynamic parameters.

[1]  K. Gaston,et al.  Do local abundances of British birds change with proximity to range edge? , 1999 .

[2]  Stanley H. Anderson,et al.  Estimation of Small‐Mammal Population Size , 1988 .

[3]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  A critique for macroecology , 1999 .

[4]  C. Kampichler,et al.  Local and regional species richness in communities of surface-dwelling grassland Collembola : indication of species saturation , 2000 .

[5]  James H. Brown,et al.  Macroecology: The Division of Food and Space Among Species on Continents , 1989, Science.

[6]  M. Conroy,et al.  Analysis and Management of Animal Populations , 2002 .

[7]  G. C. Stevens,et al.  Spatial Variation in Abundance , 1995 .

[8]  J. Sauer,et al.  North American Breeding Bird Survey Annual Summary, 1988 , 1989 .

[9]  J. Nichols,et al.  A DOUBLE-OBSERVER APPROACH FOR ESTIMATING DETECTION PROBABILITY AND ABUNDANCE FROM POINT COUNTS , 2000 .

[10]  J. Nichols,et al.  Higher temporal variability of forest breeding bird communities in fragmented landscapes. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  John M. Marzluff,et al.  Avian Conservation: Research and Management , 1999 .

[12]  S. Pimm,et al.  Population variability of sparrows in space and time , 1996 .

[13]  Mark V. Lomolino,et al.  Dynamic biogeography and conservation of endangered species , 2000, Nature.

[14]  Michael B. Lafferty Ohio's Natural Heritage , 1979 .

[15]  M. Mangel,et al.  Habitat Loss and Changes in the Species‐Area Relationship , 2000 .

[16]  J. Petranka,et al.  Monitoring Terrestrial Salamanders: Repeatability and Validity of Area-Constrained Cover Object Searches , 2000 .

[17]  G. Seber,et al.  The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters , 1974 .

[18]  J. Nichols,et al.  Forest fragmentation and bird community dynamics: inference at regional scales , 2001 .

[19]  J. Tautin,et al.  Large-scale studies of marked birds in North America , 1999 .

[20]  G. Seber,et al.  The Estimation of Animal Abundance , 1975 .

[21]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time , 2001 .

[22]  J. Nichols,et al.  Inference Methods for Spatial Variation in Species Richness and Community Composition When Not All Species Are Detected , 1998 .

[23]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Sources, Sinks, and Population Regulation , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[24]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Estimation of Density from Line Transect Sampling of Biological Populations. , 1981 .

[25]  C. Stern CONCLUDING REMARKS OF THE CHAIRMAN , 1950 .

[26]  Gary C. White,et al.  Monitoring Vertebrate Populations , 1998 .

[27]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations , 1980 .

[28]  G. R. Fitzhugh,et al.  Early life history patterns of Atlantic North American flatfish: Likely (and unlikely) factors controlling recruitment , 1991 .

[29]  James H. Brown Macroecology: progress and prospect , 1999 .

[30]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Capture-Recapture and Removal Methods for Sampling Closed Populations , 1983 .

[31]  K. Frank,et al.  A comparative analysis of recruitment variability in North Atlantic flatfishes — testing the species range hypothesis , 1997 .

[32]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Capture-recapture models. , 1992 .

[33]  D. Mehlman CHANGE IN AVIAN ABUNDANCE ACROSS THE GEOGRAPHIC RANGE IN RESPONSE TO ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE , 1997 .

[34]  Robert H. Whittaker,et al.  Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains , 1956 .

[35]  K. Burnham,et al.  Robust Estimation of Population Size When Capture Probabilities Vary Among Animals , 1979 .

[36]  R. Whittaker Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California , 1960 .

[37]  C. S. Robbins,et al.  The Breeding Bird Survey: Its First Fifteen Years, 1965-1979 , 1987 .

[38]  J. Nichols,et al.  ESTIMATING SPECIES RICHNESS: THE IMPORTANCE OF HETEROGENEITY IN SPECIES DETECTABILITY , 1998 .

[39]  Dawn M. Kaufman,et al.  THE GEOGRAPHIC RANGE: Size, Shape, Boundaries, and Internal Structure , 1996 .

[40]  J. Bunge,et al.  Estimating the Number of Species: A Review , 1993 .

[41]  Kenneth H. Pollock,et al.  A REMOVAL MODEL FOR ESTIMATING DETECTION PROBABILITIES FROM POINT-COUNT SURVEYS , 2002 .

[42]  J. Nichols,et al.  Statistical inference for capture-recapture experiments , 1992 .

[43]  J. Nichols,et al.  ESTIMATING RATES OF LOCAL SPECIES EXTINCTION, COLONIZATION, AND TURNOVER IN ANIMAL COMMUNITIES , 1998 .

[44]  S. Buckland Introduction to distance sampling : estimating abundance of biological populations , 2001 .

[45]  J. Nichols,et al.  RELATIVE SPECIES RICHNESS AND COMMUNITY COMPLETENESS: BIRDS AND URBANIZATION IN THE MID‐ATLANTIC STATES , 2000 .

[46]  J. Nichols,et al.  COMDYN: Software to study the dynamics of animal communities using a capture-recapture approach , 1999 .

[47]  J. Lawton,et al.  Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming , 1998, Nature.

[48]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Estimation of Density from Line Transect Sampling of Biological Populations. , 1982 .

[49]  Terry L. Root,et al.  ENERGY CONSTRAINTS ON AVIAN DISTRIBUTIONS AND ABUNDANCES , 1988 .

[50]  B. Peterjohn The North American Breeding Bird Survey , 1994 .

[51]  D. A. Sibley The Sibley Guide to Birds , 2000 .

[52]  J. Oostermeijer,et al.  The relationship between butterflies and environmental indicator values: a tool for conservation in a changing landscape , 1998 .