Distributional properties of language and sub-syllabic processing units

During the past few years, several studies have drawn attention to the role of distributional characteristics in the segmentation of speech into word units. In the present chapter, we examine the role of distributional constraints in the acquisition of sub-syllabic language processing units. In particular, we suggest that specific processing units such as the rime might emerge from the distributional properties of sequences of vowels and consonants. We then summarize recent work showing that speakers are indeed sensitive to statistical distributions between vocalic and consonantal segments within the syllable. Finally, a simulation study using the Parser model (Perruchet & Vinter, 1998) indicates how probabilistic constraints can influence the acquisition of representational units. We conclude that what can be viewed as processing units probably represents only the tip of the iceberg of broader knowledge about statistical properties of language and that the acquisition of such representational units is, at least partially, shaped by general learning processes. 3 In most contemporary models, language recognition and use are supposed to hinge on a set of intermediate representational processing units of various sizes. For example, it has been claimed that syllables constitute processing units in auditory word recognition, at least for syllable-timed languages (e. have all been proposed as underlying reading processes. Two key characteristics of these proposals are that the processing units envisaged often correspond to units of linguistic description, and that their acquisition is generally not considered. In this chapter, we focus on the role of distributional properties of languages as one critical determinant in the specification of language processing units. We propose that what can be viewed as processing units probably represents only the tip of the iceberg of broader knowledge about statistical properties of language and that the emergence of such representations is, at least partially, shaped by general learning processes. During the last decade, the role of distributional properties of language has mainly addressed the problem of word segmentation in the speech stream. Several studies suggest that young children are able to segment the continuous speech flow into individual words by using prosodic and segmental cues. Learning of the statistical regularities of the language is also suggested by the observation that 9-month-old children listen longer to words that include frequent phonetic sequences than to have showed that adults exposed to an artificial language composed of continuous tri-syllabic sequences without signification were able to learn the language by using the …

[1]  R Treiman,et al.  Subsyllabic units in computerized reading instruction: onset-rime vs. postvowel segmentation. , 1990, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[2]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  Influence of consonantal context on the pronunciation of vowels: A comparison of human readers and computational models , 2003, Cognition.

[3]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Learning to Segment Speech Using Multiple Cues: A Connectionist Model , 1998 .

[4]  R. Peereman,et al.  Inhibitory priming effects in auditory word recognition: when the target's competitors conflict with the prime word , 2003, Cognition.

[5]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Acquisition and use of spelling-sound correspondences in reading , 1984 .

[6]  The Status of Final Consonant Clusters in English Syllables: Evidence from Children. , 1997 .

[7]  J. McQueen Segmentation of Continuous Speech Using Phonotactics , 1998 .

[8]  P. Luce,et al.  Probabilistic Phonotactics and Neighborhood Activation in Spoken Word Recognition , 1999 .

[9]  R. Glushko The Organization and Activation of Orthographic Knowledge in Reading Aloud. , 1979 .

[10]  M. Pitt,et al.  Syllabic effects in word processing: evidence from the structural induction paradigm. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  A. Friederici,et al.  Phonotactic knowledge of word boundaries and its use in infant speech perception , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  Constraining models of lexical access: the onset of word recognition , 1991 .

[13]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants′ Detection of the Sound Patterns of Words in Fluent Speech , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The Internal Structure of the Syllable , 1989 .

[15]  D. Jared Spelling-Sound Consistency and Regularity Effects in Word Naming , 2002 .

[16]  Arnaud Rey,et al.  Graphemes are perceptual reading units , 2000, Cognition.

[17]  David B Pisoni,et al.  Perception of Wordlikeness: Effects of Segment Probability and Length on the Processing of Nonwords. , 2000, Journal of memory and language.

[18]  Peter Bryant,et al.  Rhyme and Alliteration, Phoneme Detection, and Learning to Read. , 1990 .

[19]  V. Coltheart,et al.  Some Bodies are Easier to Read: The Effect of Consistency and Regularity on Children's Reading , 1991 .

[20]  Pierre Perruchet,et al.  The exploitation of distributional information in syllable processing , 2004, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[21]  P. Bryant,et al.  Rhyme, rime, and the onset of reading. , 1989, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[22]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Structure and Content in Language Production: A Theory of Frame Constraints in Phonological Speech Errors , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  W. Levelt,et al.  Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? , 1994, Cognition.

[24]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[25]  Jean-Emile Gombert,et al.  Training children with artificial alphabet. , 2001 .

[26]  A. Woodward,et al.  Infants' sensitivity to word boundaries in fluent speech , 1996, Journal of Child Language.

[27]  Arnaud Rey,et al.  Where is the syllable priming effect in visual word recognition , 2003 .

[28]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Phonotactic cues for segmentation of fluent speech by infants , 2001, Cognition.

[29]  Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al.  Neighborhood Density and Frequency Across Languages and Modalities , 1993 .

[30]  John Coleman,et al.  Stochastic phonological grammars and acceptability , 1997, SIGMORPHON@EACL.

[31]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  English speakers' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns , 2000 .

[32]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The structure of spoken syllables: Evidence from novel word games , 1983, Cognition.

[33]  Alain Content,et al.  Sequence detection in pseudowords in French: Where is the syllable effect? , 2001 .

[34]  T. A. Cartwright,et al.  Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation , 1996, Cognition.

[35]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants′ Sensitivity to the Sound Patterns of Native Language Words , 1993 .

[36]  J. Grainger,et al.  Masked Priming of Word and Picture Naming: The Role of Syllabic Units ☆ , 1996 .

[37]  Ulrich Hans Frauenfelder,et al.  The syllable's role in speech segmentation , 1981 .

[38]  R. Treiman,et al.  How to see a reading unit , 1986 .

[39]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[40]  L. Gogate,et al.  Phoneme Awareness in Children: A Function of Sonority , 1999, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[41]  E. Newport,et al.  WORD SEGMENTATION : THE ROLE OF DISTRIBUTIONAL CUES , 1996 .

[42]  Niels O. Schiller,et al.  The effect of visually masked syllable primes on the naming latencies of words and pictures , 1998 .

[43]  Ronald Peereman,et al.  Orthographic and Phonological Neighborhoods in Naming: Not All Neighbors Are Equally Influential in Orthographic Space , 1997 .

[44]  Jackie Masterson,et al.  Are children's representations of words distributed? effects of orthographic neighbourhood size, consistency and regularity of naming , 1994 .

[45]  D. Norris A quantitative multiple-levels model of reading aloud. , 1994 .

[46]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. , 1994 .

[47]  R. Treiman,et al.  The Structure of English Syllables and Polysyllables , 1993 .

[48]  M L Stanback,et al.  Syllable and rime patterns for teaching reading: Analysis of a frequency-based vocabulary of 17,602 words , 1992, Annals of dyslexia.

[49]  A. Vinter,et al.  PARSER: A Model for Word Segmentation , 1998 .

[50]  Marcus Taft,et al.  Reading and the Mental Lexicon , 1991 .

[51]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Learning the structure of event sequences. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[52]  M. Coltheart Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading , 1987 .

[53]  Sébastien Pacton,et al.  The acquisition of untaught orthographic regularities in French , 2002 .

[54]  M. Zorzi,et al.  Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. , 1998 .

[55]  D. Kemmerer,et al.  Phonotactics and Syllable Stress: Implications for the Processing of Spoken Nonsense Words , 1997, Language and speech.

[56]  Arthur G. Samuel,et al.  Lexical inhibition and attentional allocation during speech perception: Evidence from phoneme monitoring , 1997 .

[57]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[58]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.