Cost‐effective allocation of watershed management practices using a genetic algorithm

Implementation of conservation programs are perceived as being crucial for restoring and protecting waters and watersheds from nonpoint source pollution. Success of these programs depends to a great extent on planning tools that can assist the watershed management process. Herein a novel optimization methodology is presented for deriving watershed‐scale sediment and nutrient control plans that incorporate multiple, and often conflicting, objectives. The method combines the use of a watershed model (SWAT), representation of best management practices, an economic component, and a genetic algorithm‐based spatial search procedure. For two small watersheds in Indiana located in the midwestern portion of the United States, selection and placement of best management practices by optimization was found to be nearly 3 times more cost‐effective than targeting strategies for the same level of protection specified in terms of maximum monthly sediment, phosphorus, and nitrogen loads. Conversely, for the same cost, the optimization plan reduced the maximum monthly loads by a factor of 2 when compared to the targeting plan. The optimization methodology developed in this paper can facilitate attaining water quality goals at significantly lower costs than commonly used cost share and targeting strategies.

[1]  Mazdak Arabi,et al.  ROLE OF WATERSHED SUBDIVISION ON MODELING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES WITH SWAT 1 , 2006 .

[2]  Mazdak Arabi,et al.  Modeling long-term water quality impact of structural BMPs , 2006 .

[3]  E. G. Bekele,et al.  Multiobjective management of ecosystem services by integrative watershed modeling and evolutionary algorithms , 2005 .

[4]  J. Arnold,et al.  SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling , 2005 .

[5]  G. Vazquez-Amabile Hydrologic and non-point source pollution risk analysis on agricultural watersheds , 2005 .

[6]  Misgana K. Muleta,et al.  Decision Support for Watershed Management Using Evolutionary Algorithms , 2005 .

[7]  Mary Leigh Wolfe,et al.  Cost-effective BMP placement: Optimization versus targeting , 2004 .

[8]  Willy Bauwens,et al.  Multiobjective autocalibration for semidistributed water quality models , 2003 .

[9]  R. Färe,et al.  Spatial evaluation of alternative nonpoint nutrient regulatory instruments , 2003 .

[10]  F. Fang,et al.  Pollution Trading to Offset New Pollutant Loadings -- A Case Study in the Minnesota River Basin , 2003 .

[11]  James M. Hamlett,et al.  Watershed optimization of best management practices using AnnAGNPS and a genetic algorithm , 2002 .

[12]  J. Arnold,et al.  VALIDATION OF THE SWAT MODEL ON A LARGE RWER BASIN WITH POINT AND NONPOINT SOURCES 1 , 2001 .

[13]  E. Buckner An evaluation of alternative vegetative filter strip models for use on agricultural lands of the upper Wabash River Basin , 2001 .

[14]  A. Cangelosi,et al.  Revealing the economic value of protecting the Great Lakes , 2001 .

[15]  J. G. Arnold,et al.  PREDICTING SEDIMENT AND PHOSPHORUS LOADS IN THE ROCK RIVER BASIN USING SWAT , 2000 .

[16]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach , 1999, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[17]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[18]  J. Ringuest Multiobjective Optimization: Behavioral and Computational Considerations , 1992 .

[19]  Wayne L. Winston,et al.  Introduction to mathematical programming , 1991 .

[20]  A. Barbarika,et al.  The economic efficiency of voluntary soil conservation programs , 1989 .

[21]  John R. Williams Sediment-yield prediction with Universal Equation using runoff energy factor , 1975 .

[22]  John R. Williams,et al.  Flood Routing With Variable Travel Time or Variable Storage Coefficients , 1969 .

[23]  W. Green Studies in soil physics : I. The flow of air and water through soils , 1911 .