Daclizumab high-yield process in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (SELECT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND Daclizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody, modulates interleukin-2 signalling by blocking the α subunit (CD25) of the interleukin-2 receptor. We assessed whether daclizumab high-yield process (HYP) would be effective when given as monotherapy for a 1 year treatment period in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. METHODS We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at 76 centres in the Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, India, Poland, Russia, Ukraine, Turkey, and the UK between Feb 15, 2008, and May 14, 2010. Patients aged 18-55 years with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis were randomly assigned (1:1:1), via a central interactive voice response system, to subcutaneous injections of daclizumab HYP 150 mg or 300 mg, or placebo, every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. Patients and study personnel were masked to treatment assignment, except for the site pharmacist who prepared the study drug for injection, but had no interaction with the patient. The primary endpoint was annualised relapse rate. Analysis was by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00390221. FINDINGS 204 patients were assigned to receive placebo, 208 to daclizumab HYP 150 mg, and 209 to daclizumab HYP 300 mg, of whom 188 (92%), 192 (92%), and 197 (94%), respectively, completed follow-up to week 52. The annualised relapse rate was lower for patients given daclizumab HYP 150 mg (0·21, 95% CI 0·16-0·29; 54% reduction, 95% CI 33-68%; p<0·0001) or 300 mg (0·23, 0·17-0·31, 50% reduction, 28-65%; p=0·00015) than for those given placebo (0·46, 0·37-0·57). More patients were relapse free in the daclizumab HYP 150 mg (81%) and 300 mg (80%) groups than in the placebo group (64%; p<0·0001 in the 150 mg group and p=0·0003 in the 300 mg group). 12 (6%) patients in the placebo group, 15 (7%) of those in the daclizumab 150 mg group, and 19 (9%) in the 300 mg group had serious adverse events excluding multiple sclerosis relapse. One patient given daclizumab HYP 150 mg who was recovering from a serious rash died because of local complication of a psoas abscess. INTERPRETATION Subcutaneous daclizumab HYP administered every 4 weeks led to clinically important effects on multiple sclerosis disease activity during 1 year of treatment. Our findings support the potential for daclizumab HYP to offer an additional treatment option for relapsing-remitting disease. FUNDING Biogen Idec and AbbVie Biotherapeutics Inc.

[1]  T. Waldmann,et al.  A vital role for IL-2 trans-presentation in DC-mediated T cell activation in humans as revealed by daclizumab therapy , 2011, Nature Medicine.

[2]  Matthew Hardy,et al.  Cell-specific protein phenotypes for the autoimmune locus IL2RA using a genotype-selectable human bioresource , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[3]  A Thompson,et al.  The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29): a new patient-based outcome measure. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  J. Ware,et al.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. , 1996, Medical care.

[5]  J. Kurtzke Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis , 1983, Neurology.

[6]  A. DeMichele,et al.  CD25 Blockade Depletes and Selectively Reprograms Regulatory T Cells in Concert with Immunotherapy in Cancer Patients , 2012, Science Translational Medicine.

[7]  R. Zinkernagel,et al.  Immune responses in interleukin-2-deficient mice. , 1993, Science.

[8]  Xavier Montalban,et al.  Daclizumab in active relapsing multiple sclerosis (CHOICE study): a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, add-on trial with interferon beta , 2010, The Lancet Neurology.

[9]  Linjiang Zhu,et al.  A low interleukin-2 receptor signaling threshold supports the development and homeostasis of T regulatory cells. , 2009, Immunity.

[10]  J. Rose,et al.  Treatment of multiple sclerosis with an anti–interleukin‐2 receptor monoclonal antibody , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[11]  A. Williams EuroQol : a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life , 1990 .

[12]  H. Weiner,et al.  Immunohistochemical analysis of the cellular infiltrate in multiple sclerosis lesions , 1986, Annals of neurology.

[13]  C. Poser,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis , 2001, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[14]  B. Bielekova,et al.  Inhibition of LTi Cell Development by CD25 Blockade Is Associated with Decreased Intrathecal Inflammation in Multiple Sclerosis , 2012, Science Translational Medicine.

[15]  T. Waldmann,et al.  Humanized anti-CD25 (daclizumab) inhibits disease activity in multiple sclerosis patients failing to respond to interferon beta. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  E. Jacquemin,et al.  CD25 Appears Non Essential for Human Peripheral Treg Maintenance In Vivo , 2010, PloS one.

[17]  F. Shi,et al.  Interleukin‐2/interleukin‐2 antibody therapy induces target organ natural killer cells that inhibit central nervous system inflammation , 2011, Annals of neurology.

[18]  C. Polman,et al.  Sustained improvement in Expanded Disability Status Scale as a new efficacy measure of neurological change in multiple sclerosis: treatment effects with natalizumab in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis , 2011, Multiple sclerosis.

[19]  P. Matthews,et al.  Normalized Accurate Measurement of Longitudinal Brain Change , 2001, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[20]  L. Roccatagliata,et al.  Surrogate endpoints for EDSS worsening in multiple sclerosis , 2010, Neurology.

[21]  Donna Graves,et al.  Current and emerging therapies in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review , 2012, Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders.

[22]  C. Lederer,et al.  Disability as an outcome in MS clinical trials , 2008, Neurology.

[23]  T. Malek,et al.  The biology of interleukin-2. , 2008, Annual review of immunology.

[24]  S. Reingold,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria” , 2005, Annals of neurology.

[25]  H. McFarland,et al.  Regulatory T cells are reduced during anti-CD25 antibody treatment of multiple sclerosis. , 2009, Archives of neurology.

[26]  T. Waldmann,et al.  Regulatory CD56(bright) natural killer cells mediate immunomodulatory effects of IL-2Ralpha-targeted therapy (daclizumab) in multiple sclerosis. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  J. Sheridan,et al.  Intermediate-affinity interleukin-2 receptor expression predicts CD56bright natural killer cell expansion after daclizumab treatment in the CHOICE study of patients with multiple sclerosis , 2011, Multiple sclerosis.

[28]  H. Rodt,et al.  Immunohistochemical identification of T-lymphocytes in the central nervous system of patients with multiple sclerosis and subacute sclerosing panencephalitis , 1982, Journal of Neuroimmunology.

[29]  F. Lublin The incomplete nature of multiple sclerosis relapse resolution , 2007, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[30]  B. Bielekova,et al.  An IL-2 Paradox: Blocking CD25 on T Cells Induces IL-2–Driven Activation of CD56bright NK Cells , 2010, The Journal of Immunology.