A Meta-Analysis of National Research: Effects of Teaching Strategies on Student Achievement in Science in the United States

This project consisted of a meta-analysis of U.S. research published from 1980 to 2004 on the effect of specific science teaching strategies on student achievement. The six phases of the project included study acquisition, study coding, determination of intercoder objectivity, establishing criteria for inclusion of studies, computation of effect sizes for statistical analysis, and conducting the analyses. Studies were required to have been carried out in the United States, been experimental or quasi-experimental, and must have included effect size or the statistics necessary to calculate effect size. Sixty-one studies met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The following eight categories of teaching strategies were revealed during analysis of the studies (effect sizes in parentheses): Questioning Strategies (0.74); Manipulation Strategies (0.57); Enhanced Material Strategies (0.29); Assessment Strategies (0.51); Inquiry Strategies (0.65); Enhanced Context Strategies (1.48); Instructional Technology (IT) Strategies (0.48); and Collaborative Learning Strategies (0.95). All these effect sizes were judged to be significant. Regression analysis revealed that internal validity was influenced by Publication Type, Type of Study, and Test Type. External validity was not influenced by Publication Year, Grade Level, Test Content, or Treatment Categories. The major implication of this research is that we have generated empirical evidence supporting the effectiveness of alternative teaching strategies in science. 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 44: 1436-1460, 2007

[1]  Jane Butler Kahle,et al.  The effects of instructional organization and locus of control orientation on meaningful learning in high school biology students , 1984 .

[2]  M. R. Matthews Science teaching : the role of history and philosophy of science , 1994 .

[3]  Sandra P. Horn,et al.  Teacher and Classroom Context Effects on Student Achievement: Implications for Teacher Evaluation , 1997 .

[4]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform , 2004 .

[5]  James R. Okey,et al.  A meta-analysis of the effects of various science teaching strategies on achievement , 1983 .

[6]  Larry D. Yore,et al.  Impact of a school district's science reform effort on the achievement and attitudes of third- and fourth-grade students , 2004 .

[7]  L. Hedges,et al.  How Large Are Teacher Effects? , 2004 .

[8]  Kevin C. Wise,et al.  Strategies for Teaching Science: What Works?. , 1996 .

[9]  Fred Goldberg,et al.  Using Computers to Create Constructivist Learning Environments: Impact on Pedagogy and Achievement , 2003 .

[10]  E. Hanushek,et al.  Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement , 1998 .

[11]  W. Harwood,et al.  Effects of integrated video media on student achievement and attitudes in high school chemistry , 1997 .

[12]  Yeonhee L. Kim,et al.  Conducting Your First Meta-Analysis: An Illustrated Guide , 1998 .

[13]  B. Thompson What Future Quantitative Social Science Research Could Look Like: Confidence Intervals for Effect Sizes , 2002 .

[14]  J. Riley The effects of teachers' wait‐time and knowledge comprehension questioning on science achievement , 1986 .

[15]  David Klahr,et al.  The Psychology of Scientific Thinking: Implications for Science Teaching and Learning , 2006 .

[16]  H. Harty,et al.  Influence of resequencing general science content on the science achievement, attitudes toward science, and interest in science of sixth grade students , 1987 .

[17]  George E. Glasson,et al.  The effects of hands-on and teacher demonstration laboratory methods on science achievement in relation to reasoning ability and prior knowledge , 1989 .

[18]  Effects of individualized assignments on biology achievement , 1983 .

[19]  Nancy R. Romance,et al.  A curriculum strategy that expands time for in-depth elementary science instruction by using science-based reading strategies: Effects of a year-long study in grade four , 1992 .

[20]  Neset Demirci,et al.  The effects of a web-based physics software program on students' achievement and misconceptions in force and motion concepts , 2001 .

[21]  Yaqoub J. Jafer The effects of computer-assisted instruction on fourth-grade students' achievement and attitudes toward desert issues , 2003 .

[22]  Robert J. Marzano,et al.  A Theory-Based Meta-Analysis of Research on Instruction. , 1998 .

[23]  C. Berube A Study of the Effects of Constructivist Based vs. Traditional Direct Instruction on 8th Grade Science Comprehension , 2001 .

[24]  F. G. Dillashaw,et al.  Effects of a modified mastery learning strategy on achievement, attitudes, and on‐task behavior of high school chemistry students , 1983 .

[25]  Brian Hand,et al.  Using a Science Writing Heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh‐grade science: quantitative and qualitative aspects , 2004 .

[26]  Robert E. Yager Comparison of Standard Student Performance When Science Study is Organized Around Typical Concepts Versus Local Issues , 1989 .

[27]  Hee-Sun Lee,et al.  Research towards an expanded understanding of inquiry science beyond one idealized standard , 2003 .

[28]  Bob N. Cage,et al.  A study of the effects of an integrated, activity-based science curriculum on student achievement, science process skills, and science attitudes , 2000 .

[29]  The effects of a diagnostic-prescriptive teaching strategy on student achievement and attitude in biology , 1981 .

[30]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  Effects of Advance Questioning and Prior Knowledge on Science Learning , 1994 .

[31]  Y. Lincoln,et al.  Scientific Research in Education , 2004 .

[32]  Ronald D. Anderson,et al.  Science education: A meta‐analysis of major questions , 1983 .

[33]  L. Houtz,et al.  Instructional Strategy Change and the Attitude and Achievement of Seventh- and Eighth-Grade Science Students. , 1995 .

[34]  Daniel P. Shepardson,et al.  A Comparison of Concrete and Formal Science Instruction upon Science Achievement and Reasoning Ability of Sixth Grade Students. , 1987 .

[35]  R. Marx,et al.  Design‐based science and student learning , 2004 .

[36]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  The effect of levels of cooperation within physical science laboratory groups on physical science achievement , 1994 .

[37]  John W. Renner,et al.  Results of two tenth-grade biology teaching procedures , 1983 .

[38]  Effects of Traditional Lecture Versus Teacher-Constructed & Student-Constructed Self-Teaching Instructional Resources on Short-Term Science Achievement & Attitudes , 2003 .

[39]  Thomas Andre,et al.  Using a computer simulation before dissection to help students learn anatomy , 2000 .

[40]  Derrick R. Lavoie Effects of Emphasizing Hypothetico-Predictive Reasoning within the Science Learning Cycle on High School Student's Process Skills and Conceptual Understandings in Biology. , 1999 .

[41]  M. Hunt How Science Takes Stock: The Story of Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[42]  A. Ahlgren,et al.  Science for all Americans , 1990 .

[43]  C. S. Marszalek Effects on seventh-grade students' achievement and science anxiety of alternatives to conventional frog dissection , 1998 .

[44]  J. Shea National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[45]  Amy Pallant,et al.  Reasoning with Atomic-Scale Molecular Dynamic Models , 2004 .

[46]  L. Shulman Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[47]  Peter A. Youngs,et al.  Teacher Characteristics and Student Achievement Gains: A Review , 2003 .

[48]  Robert E. Yager,et al.  Scope, sequence and coordination: The Iowa Project, a national reform effort in the USA , 1999 .

[49]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Effects of single-sex and mixed-sex cooperative interaction on science achievement and attitudes and cross-handicap and cross-sex relationships , 1985 .

[50]  Bridget Dalton,et al.  Supported Inquiry Science , 1997, Journal of learning disabilities.

[51]  John W. Renner,et al.  Concrete and formal teaching , 1980 .

[52]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .