Real-time observations of microtubule dynamic instability in living cells

Individual microtubule dynamics were observed in real time in primary cultures of newt lung epithelium using video-enhanced differential interference contrast microscopy and digital image processing. The linear filaments observed in cells corresponded to microtubules based on three criteria: (a) small particles translocated along them; (b) the majority of them disappeared after incubation in nocodazole; (c) and the distribution observed by differential interference contrast correlated with anti-tubulin immunofluorescence staining of the same cell. Microtubules were most clearly observed at the leading edge of cells located at the periphery of the epithelial sheet. Microtubules exhibited dynamic instability behavior: individual microtubules existed in persistent phases of elongation or rapid shortening. Microtubules elongated at a velocity of 7.2 micron/min +/- 0.3 SEM (n = 42) and rapidly shortened at a velocity of 17.3 micron/min +/- 0.7 SEM (n = 35). The transitions between elongation and rapid shortening occurred abruptly and stochastically with a transition frequency of 0.014 s-1 for catastrophe and 0.044 s-1 for rescue. Approximately 70% of the rapidly shortening microtubules were rescued and resumed elongation within the 35 x 35 micron microscopic field. A portion of the microtubule population appeared differentially stable and did not display any measurable elongation or shortening during 10-15-min observations.

[1]  K. Weber,et al.  Immunofluorescence and immunocytochemical procedures with affinity purified antibodies: tubulin-containing structures. , 1982, Methods in cell biology.

[2]  E. Salmon,et al.  Analysis of the treadmilling model during metaphase of mitosis using fluorescence redistribution after photobleaching , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Microtubule dynamics in interphase cells , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  G. Borisy,et al.  Polymerization of tubulin in vivo: direct evidence for assembly onto microtubule ends and from centrosomes , 1985, The Journal of cell biology.

[5]  S. Inoué Cell division and the mitotic spindle , 1981, The Journal of cell biology.

[6]  E. Salmon,et al.  Oscillatory movements of monooriented chromosomes and their position relative to the spindle pole result from the ejection properties of the aster and half-spindle , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[7]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Beyond self-assembly: From microtubules to morphogenesis , 1986, Cell.

[8]  J. McIntosh,et al.  Spindle microtubule dynamics in sea urchin embryos: analysis using a fluorescein-labeled tubulin and measurements of fluorescence redistribution after laser photobleaching , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Sites of microtubule assembly and disassembly in the mitotic spindle , 1986, Cell.

[10]  K. Weber,et al.  Radioimmunoassay for tubulin: a quantitative comparison of the tubulin content of different established tissue culture cells and tissues , 1978, Cell.

[11]  P Wadsworth,et al.  Dynamics of microtubule depolymerization in monocytes , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[12]  P. Woollard,et al.  MICROTUBULES , 1978, The Lancet.

[13]  E. Salmon,et al.  Dynamic instability of individual microtubules analyzed by video light microscopy: rate constants and transition frequencies , 1988, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Microtubule assembly nucleated by isolated centrosomes , 1984, Nature.

[15]  E. Salmon,et al.  Rapid rate of tubulin dissociation from microtubules in the mitotic spindle in vivo measured by blocking polymerization with colchicine , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[16]  E. Salmon,et al.  Polarized microtubule gliding and particle saltations produced by soluble factors from sea urchin eggs and embryos. , 1986, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[17]  M. Daniels THE ROLE OF MICROTUBULES IN THE GROWTH AND STABILIZATION OF NERVE FIBERS , 1975, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[18]  R. Allen,et al.  Studies on the motility of the foraminifera. II. The dynamic microtubular cytoskeleton of the reticulopodial network of Allogromia laticollaris , 1983, The Journal of cell biology.

[19]  M. Koonce,et al.  Active sliding between cytoplasmic microtubules , 1987, Nature.

[20]  G. Borisy,et al.  Direct observation of microtubule dynamics in living cells , 1988, Nature.

[21]  R D Allen,et al.  Video-enhanced contrast, differential interference contrast (AVEC-DIC) microscopy: a new method capable of analyzing microtubule-related motility in the reticulopodial network of Allogromia laticollaris. , 1981, Cell motility.

[22]  S Inoué,et al.  Video image processing greatly enhances contrast, quality, and speed in polarization-based microscopy , 1981, The Journal of cell biology.

[23]  E D Salmon,et al.  Tubulin dynamics in cultured mammalian cells , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[24]  G. Borisy,et al.  Microtubule dynamics in vivo: a test of mechanisms of turnover , 1987, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  E. Salmon,et al.  Dynamic instability of microtubules , 1987, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[26]  H. Hotani,et al.  Visualization of the dynamic instability of individual microtubules by dark-field microscopy , 1986, Nature.

[27]  J. McIntosh,et al.  Fluorescent microtubules break up under illumination , 1988, The Journal of cell biology.

[28]  S. Bowser,et al.  Optical approaches to the study of foraminiferan motility. , 1988, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[29]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Dynamic and stable populations of microtubules in cells , 1987, The Journal of cell biology.