The Influence of Female Directors on Product Recall Decisions

Problem definition: The influence of female directors on firm decision-making and performance is a frequently studied research topic but has received limited attention in operations management. We investigate if adding female directors to a firm’s board of directors changes whether and how quickly the firm recalls defective products. Academic/practical relevance: By demonstrating a relationship between an increase in female directors and more rule-conscious, customer-focused recall decisions, we highlight that adding female directors may enable more societally beneficial operational decisions. Methodology: We analyze 4,271 medical product recalls from 2002 to 2013 across 92 publicly traded firms regulated by the Food and Drug Administration using negative binomial and ordinary least squares fixed effect regression models. In robustness checks, we include an instrumental variable analysis, propensity score matching models, and reverse causality regression models. Results: As boards add female directors, recall decisions change. Firms initiate more medical product recalls that are low in severity and hence easier for firms to avoid initiating, highlighting the increased rule-following brought to bear by adding female directors. Firms also make faster recall decisions for the most serious defects that are high in severity and dangerous for customers, highlighting the increased stakeholder responsiveness resulting from adding female directors. Managerial implications: Firms may more closely align recall decisions with regulatory rules and become more sensitized to customer health and safety by adding female directors. Further, at least two female directors may be required to speed up recall decisions for the most serious, life-threatening defects.

[1]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  Diversity Thresholds: How Social Norms, Visibility, and Scrutiny Relate to Group Composition , 2019, Academy of Management Journal.

[2]  Kris Byron,et al.  Board Independence and Corporate Misconduct: A Cross-National Meta-Analysis , 2018, Journal of Management.

[3]  Ujjal Kumar Mukherjee,et al.  Product Recall Decisions in Medical Device Supply Chains: A Big Data Analytic Approach to Evaluating Judgment Bias , 2018 .

[4]  David Xiaosong Peng,et al.  Addressing Endogeneity in Operations Management Research: Recent Developments, Common Problems, and Directions for Future Research , 2018, Journal of Operations Management.

[5]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  The Impact of E-Visits on Visit Frequencies and Patient Health: Evidence from Primary Care , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[6]  Executive Suite Independence: Is It Related to Board Independence? , 2016 .

[7]  M. Pillutla,et al.  Male Immorality: An Evolutionary Account of Sex Differences in Unethical Negotiation Behavior , 2017 .

[8]  Rachna Shah,et al.  Do Plant Inspections Predict Future Quality? The Role of Investigator Experience , 2017, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[9]  Adam J. Wowak,et al.  The Elephant (or Donkey) in the Boardroom , 2017 .

[10]  Serguei Netessine,et al.  Plant Operations and Product Recalls in the Automotive Industry: An Empirical Investigation , 2017, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Michael W. Toffel,et al.  Monitoring global supply chains: Monitoring Global Supply Chains , 2016 .

[12]  S. Terjesen,et al.  Does the presence of independent and female directors impact firm performance? A multi-country study of board diversity , 2016 .

[13]  Forrest Briscoe,et al.  Coordinating Complex Work: Knowledge Networks, Partner Departures, and Client Relationship Performance in a Law Firm , 2016, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Kris Byron,et al.  Women on Boards of Directors and Corporate Social Performance: A Meta‐Analysis , 2016 .

[15]  Kaitlin D. Wowak,et al.  Throwing caution to the wind: The effect of CEO stock option pay on the incidence of product safety problems , 2015 .

[16]  M. Sabatier,et al.  A women’s boom in the boardroom: effects on performance? , 2015 .

[17]  Kris Byron,et al.  Women on Boards and Firm Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2014 .

[18]  Venkat Subramaniam,et al.  Impact of Financial Leverage on the Incidence and Severity of Product Failures: Evidence from Product Recalls , 2014 .

[19]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Social Discrimination in the Corporate Elite , 2013 .

[20]  Kai Li,et al.  Director Gender and Mergers and Acquisitions , 2013 .

[21]  L. V. Wassenhove,et al.  On the appropriate objective function for post‐disaster humanitarian logistics models , 2013 .

[22]  Allen N. Berger,et al.  Executive Board Composition and Bank Risk Taking , 2014, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[23]  Amalia R. Miller,et al.  A Female Style in Corporate Leadership? Evidence from Quotas , 2012 .

[24]  L. V. Wassenhove,et al.  On the unique features of post‐disaster humanitarian logistics , 2012 .

[25]  Matthew S. Johnson,et al.  Randomized Government Safety Inspections Reduce Worker Injuries with No Detectable Job Loss , 2012, Science.

[26]  Renée B. Adams,et al.  Beyond the Glass Ceiling: Does Gender Matter? , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Shannon Portillo The Paradox of Rules , 2012 .

[28]  Yue Pan,et al.  Predictors, consequence, and measurement of ethical judgments: Review and meta-analysis , 2012 .

[29]  Maureen I. Muller-Kahle,et al.  Did Board Configuration Matter? The Case of US Subprime Lenders , 2011 .

[30]  Amy K. Dittmar,et al.  The Changing of the Boards: The Impact on Firm Valuation of Mandated Female Board Representation , 2011 .

[31]  Michelle K. Ryan,et al.  Think crisis-think female: the glass cliff and contextual variation in the think manager-think male stereotype. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  Morten Huse,et al.  Women Directors on Corporate Boards: From Tokenism to Critical Mass , 2011 .

[33]  Sriram Thirumalai,et al.  Product Recalls in the Medical Device Industry: An Empirical Exploration of the Sources and Financial Consequences , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[34]  A. Hillman,et al.  The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change , 2010 .

[35]  M. Huse,et al.  The Contribution of Women on Boards of Directors: Going Beyond the Surface , 2010 .

[36]  Y. Kor,et al.  Experience-Based Human Capital and Social Capital of Outside Directors , 2008 .

[37]  Leisha DeHart‐Davis,et al.  Gender and Organizational Rule Abidance , 2009 .

[38]  L. V. Wassenhove,et al.  Sustainable Operations Management , 2005 .

[39]  Bruce A. Walters,et al.  Board vigilance, director experience, and corporate outcomes , 2008 .

[40]  Alison M. Konrad,et al.  Critical Mass:: The Impact of Three or More Women on Corporate Boards , 2008 .

[41]  S. Terjesen,et al.  Newly appointed directors in the boardroom:: How do women and men differ? , 2008 .

[42]  Renée B. Adams,et al.  Women in the Boardroom and Their Impact on Governance and Performance , 2008 .

[43]  Mooweon Rhee,et al.  The Role of Volition in Organizational Learning: The Case of Automotive Product Recalls , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[44]  J. Hyde,et al.  Gender differences in moral orientation: a meta-analysis. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[45]  James D. Westphal Collaboration in the Boardroom: Behavioral and Performance Consequences of CEO-Board Social Ties , 1999 .

[46]  George R. Franke,et al.  Gender differences in ethical perceptions of business practices: a social role theory perspective. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[47]  Robert E. Smith,et al.  Gender differences in information processing strategies: An empirical test of the selectivity , 1995 .

[48]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[49]  R. Kanter Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.