Outsourcing control to the environment: effects of stimulus/response locations on task selection

Response-time and accuracy costs as assessed in the context of the task-switching paradigm are usually thought to represent processes involved in the selection of abstract task sets. However, task sets are also applied to specific stimulus and response constellations, which in turn may become associated with task-set representations. To explore the consequence of such associations, we used a task-switching paradigm in which subjects had to select between two tasks (color or orientation discrimination) that were either associated with shared or unique stimulus/response locations on a touchscreen. When each task was associated with unique locations, error switch costs, stimulus–response congruency effects, as well as the characteristic task-switch × repetition-priming interaction were eliminated, and global selection costs were substantially reduced. These results demonstrate that to understand standard task-switching phenomena it is critical to consider links between lower level stimulus/response parameters and task sets.

[1]  I. Biederman,et al.  Mental set and mental shift revisited , 1976 .

[2]  D A Rosenbaum,et al.  Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  G. Logan Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[4]  D. Alan Allport,et al.  SHIFTING INTENTIONAL SET - EXPLORING THE DYNAMIC CONTROL OF TASKS , 1994 .

[5]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[7]  N. Meiran Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. , 1996 .

[8]  S. Keele,et al.  Changing internal constraints on action: the role of backward inhibition. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  Reconfiguration of stimulus task sets and response task sets during task switching , 2000 .

[10]  J. Driver,et al.  Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII , 2000 .

[11]  Sarah H. Creem,et al.  Grasping objects by their handles: a necessary interaction between cognition and action. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  U. Mayr Age differences in the selection of mental sets: the role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap. , 2001, Psychology and aging.

[13]  R. Kliegl,et al.  Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  B. Milliken,et al.  Aging and repetition effects: separate specific and nonspecific influences. , 2003, Psychology and aging.

[15]  S. Monsell Task switching , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  B. Hommel,et al.  Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus–task bindings in task-shift costs , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Stefanie Schuch,et al.  The costs of changing the representation of action: response repetition and response-response compatibility in dual tasks. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  B. Hommel Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  Ulrich Mayr,et al.  On the role of verbalization during task set selection: Switching or serial order control? , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Edward Awh,et al.  Resolving visual interference during covert spatial orienting: online attentional control through static records of prior visual experience. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  U. Mayr,et al.  Sticky rules: integration between abstract rules and specific actions. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  R. Gaschler,et al.  Instruction-induced feature binding , 2007, Psychological research.

[23]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Feature integration across perception and action: event files affect response choice , 2007, Psychological research.