An analysis of trends, perceptions, and use patterns of electronic medical records among US family practice residency programs.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES This study intended to quantify electronic medical record (EMR) use in family practice residencies, associate program characteristics with EMR use, and identify perceptions and issues about the use of EMRs. METHODS A survey was mailed to all 454 US family practice residency programs, with a 72% response rate. The survey, which was pretested and revised, was designed to identify benefits, problems, perceptions, and trends regarding the use of EMRs. RESULTS Fifty-five of 329 programs (17%) were using an EMR, while 10 (3%) had used an EMR but discontinued. Programs in the South reported the highest EMR use (21%, 21/99), and those in the North Central region reported the lowest use (11%, 11/102). EMR use was highest in university settings (19%, 15/81), programs offering fellowships (26%, 24/92), new programs (36%, 18/48), and programs that require research (22%, 20/91). Of the 329 programs that responded, 43% (143 programs) reported having information systems (IS) committees. Of the 55 programs currently using EMRs, 78% had at least one full-time equivalent IS technician. Of programs that discontinued use, software inadequacy was the most frequently cited reason (40%, 4/10). Programs that had never used EMR systems (n = 264) were more likely than those that had used EMRs (n = 65) to favorably perceive EMRs with respect to 1) meeting program requirements (44% versus 34%), 2) documenting improved patient care (65% versus 43%), 3) providing a reliable research database (94% versus 55%), and 4) documenting resident experience (92% versus 53%). Of the 264 (80%) programs that had never used an EMR, 172 (65%) plan to implement one. CONCLUSIONS EMR use is low among US family practice residency programs, but some success in implementation of EMRs has been achieved. Based on the responses to this survey, use will likely increase from 55 of 329 programs (17%) to 153 of 329 (47%) by 2000.

[1]  E G Nold,et al.  Trends in health information systems technology. , 1997, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[2]  V. Patel,et al.  Assessment of a computerized patient record system: a cognitive approach to evaluating medical technology. , 1996, M.D. computing : computers in medical practice.

[3]  M. Ebell,et al.  Family physicians' preferences for computerized decision-support hardware and software. , 1997, The Journal of family practice.

[4]  T. Swanson,et al.  Recent implementations of electronic medical records in four family practice residency programs , 1997, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[5]  C R Krause,et al.  Forming an integrated documentation system. , 1996, Nursing management.

[6]  Henry C. Barry,et al.  Implementation and termination of a computerized medical information system. , 1996 .

[7]  T Timpka,et al.  Implementation of computer-based patient records in primary care: the societal health economic effects. , 1996, Proceedings : a conference of the American Medical Informatics Association. AMIA Fall Symposium.

[8]  S. Ornstein,et al.  Electronic medical records in family practice: the time is now. , 1997, The Journal of family practice.

[9]  Hayes Gm.  Medical records: past, present, and future. , 1996 .

[10]  B. Rowe,et al.  First-year family medicine residents' use of computers: knowledge, skills and attitudes. , 1995, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[11]  S. Spann,et al.  Should the complete medical record be computerized in family practice? An affirmative view. , 1990, The Journal of family practice.

[12]  J Fiesta.  Legal issues in the information age--part 2. , 1996, Nursing management.

[13]  S. Ornstein,et al.  Family practice educators' perceptions of computer-based patient records. , 1995, Family medicine.

[14]  R B Altman.  Informatics in the care of patients: ten notable challenges. , 1997, The Western journal of medicine.

[15]  T G Tape,et al.  Computerized medical records and preventive health care: success depends on many factors. , 1993, The American journal of medicine.