Emergent Solutions for Global Climate Change: Lessons from Green IS Research

In the emerging field of Green IT/IS, 2% is often quoted as the percentage of environmentally harmful emissions attributed to the IT industry. The term ‘Green IT’ is now part of the vocabulary, recognizing the problem of IT as a polluter and the responsibility of IT professionals. There is a counter argument that in IT, IS people have the potential to positively influence the global environmental future – in other words, develop Green IS to reduce the other 98%. Given the urgent need for progress on Climate Change, the authors argue that it is the duty of IS academics, researchers, and practitioners to reorient IS and develop new IS practices that optimize processes in support of sustainable outcomes. This argument is supported by the ability of IS to transform business processes. This paper describes Climate Change as an example of a ‘wicked problem,’ and argues that IS research has often demonstrated that imposed, top down solutions are ineffective for highly complex problems. In contrast, bottom up, emergent solutions have more promise for creating real change.

[1]  Jiahua Pan,et al.  China's balance of emissions embodied in trade: approaches to measurement and allocating international responsibility , 2008 .

[2]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Information systems failures—a survey and classification of the empirical literature , 1988 .

[3]  Toby Velte,et al.  Green IT: Reduce Your Information System's Environmental Impact While Adding to the Bottom Line , 2008 .

[4]  W. Orlikowski The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations , 2014 .

[5]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Information Systems and Environmentally Sustainable Development: Energy Informatics and New Directions for the IS Community , 2010, MIS Q..

[6]  Lan Yi,et al.  A review of research on the environmental impact of e-business and ICT. , 2007, Environment international.

[7]  Takanobu Kosugi,et al.  Internalization of the external costs of global environmental damage in an integrated assessment model , 2009 .

[8]  Graham K. Rand,et al.  Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences , 1983 .

[9]  Alemayehu Molla,et al.  Perceived E-Readiness Factors in E-Commerce Adoption: An Empirical Investigation in a Developing Country , 2005, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[10]  Steve Elliot,et al.  Environmentally Sustainable ICT: Developing Corporate Capabilities and an Industry-Relevant is Research Agenda , 2008, PACIS.

[11]  Alemayehu Molla,et al.  Green IT diffusion: An international comparison , 2009 .

[12]  Steve Elliot,et al.  Environmentally Sustainable ICT: A Critical Topic for IS Research? , 2007, PACIS.

[13]  Alemayehu Molla,et al.  GITAM: A Model for the Adoption of Green IT , 2008 .

[14]  Robert F. Carey,et al.  a heuristics approach to understanding privacy-protecting behaviors in digital social environments , 2009 .

[15]  Geoffrey Dick,et al.  The greening of organisational IT: what makes a difference? , 2010, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[16]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale , 2000 .

[17]  William D. Berry,et al.  New Tools for Social Scientists: Advances and Applications in Research Methods , 1987 .

[18]  N. Smith-sebasto,et al.  Designing a likert-type scale to predict environmentally responsible behavior in undergraduate students: A multistep process. , 1995 .

[19]  R. Westrum The Social Construction of Technological Systems , 1989 .

[20]  Andrea Caldelli,et al.  Management Information System – A Tool for Corporate Sustainability , 2004 .

[21]  Chris Sauer,et al.  Why information systems fail: a case study approach , 1993 .

[22]  P. Rao,et al.  Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance , 2005 .

[23]  L. Warne Conflict and politics and information systems failure: a challenge for information systems professionals and researchers , 2003 .

[24]  Lora Oehlberg,et al.  Sustainability Through Meaning Providing Information to Promote Meaningful Products , 2007 .

[25]  S. Dabbo,et al.  Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People to Change Addictive Behavior , 1993 .

[26]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[27]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  Sara Ljungblad Everyday Visualization to Support a Sustainable Development , 2007 .

[29]  Elayne W. Coakes,et al.  Socio-Technical and Human Cognition Elements of Information Systems , 2002 .

[30]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[31]  V. Smil,et al.  Energy at the Crossroads , 2003 .

[32]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Information systems and ecological sustainability , 2008, J. Syst. Inf. Technol..

[33]  A. J. Brush Did You Leave the Calendar On? Exploring trade-offs between availability and power consumption in the home , 2007 .

[34]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[35]  Lutfus Sayeed,et al.  An Exploratory Study on Environmental Sustainability and IT Use , 2008, AMCIS.

[36]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  A Foundation for the Study of IT Effects: A New Look at DeSanctis and Poole's Concepts of Structural Features and Spirit , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Leyland Pitt,et al.  e-Relationships for e-Readiness: Culture and corruption in international e-B2B , 2008 .