Processing punctuation and word changes in different editions of prose fiction

The digital era has brought with it a shift in the field of literary editing in terms of the amount and kind of textual variation that can reasonably be annotated by editors. However, questions remain about how far readers engage with textual variants, especially minor ones such as small-scale changes to punctuation. In this study we present an eye-tracking experiment investigating reader sensitivity to variations in surface textual features of prose fiction. We monitored eye movements while participants read textual variants from Dickens and James, hypothesising that readers may pay more attention to lexical rather than punctuation changes. We found longer reading times for both types, but only lexical changes also increased reading times for the rest of the sentence. In addition, eye movement behaviour and conscious ability to report changes were highly correlated. We discuss the implications for how such methods might be applied to questions of “literary” significance and textual processing.

[1]  K. Rayner,et al.  Punctuation and intonation effects on clause and sentence wrap-up: Evidence from eye movements , 2006 .

[2]  Gareth Carrol,et al.  Eye-tracking multi-word units: some methodological questions , 2015 .

[3]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  A context-dependent representation model for explaining text repetition effects , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  A. Schacht,et al.  In the eye of the recipient: Pupillary responses to suspense in literary classics , 2014 .

[5]  Robin L. Hill,et al.  Chapter 22 – Commas and Spaces: Effects of Punctuation on Eye Movements and Sentence Parsing , 2000 .

[6]  Challenges in Editing Late Nineteenth-and Early Twentieth-Century Prose Fiction: What Is Editorial “Completeness”? , 2016 .

[7]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Eye movements in reading and information processing : , 2015 .

[8]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[9]  Petra Hendriks,et al.  Look before you leap: How enjambment affects the processing of poetry , 2014 .

[10]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[11]  Kay Ann Hartwig,et al.  Portrait of a Lady , 1985 .

[12]  Adrian Staub,et al.  Eye movements and on-line comprehension processes , 2007 .

[13]  Frouke Hermens,et al.  Dummy eye measurements of microsaccades: Testing the influence of system noise and head movements on microsaccade detection in a popular video-based eye tracker , 2015 .

[14]  David I. Hanauer,et al.  Integration of phonetic and graphic features in poetic text categorization judgements , 1996 .

[15]  Joël Pynte,et al.  The influence of punctuation and word class on distributed processing in normal reading , 2007, Vision Research.

[16]  Johanna K. Kaakinen,et al.  Task effects on eye movements during reading. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  Anna Katharina Schaffner,et al.  Reading Space in Visual Poetry: New Cognitive Perspectives , 2012 .

[18]  Kathy Conklin,et al.  Seeing a phrase "time and again" matters: the role of phrasal frequency in the processing of multiword sequences. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  Patrick Sturt,et al.  Linguistic focus and memory: An eye movement study , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Charles Dickens,et al.  adventures of Oliver Twist , 1837 .

[21]  A. Roberts,et al.  Space and Pattern in Linear and Postlinear Poetry , 2013 .

[22]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  Readers’ responses to sub-genre and rhyme scheme in poetry , 2006 .

[23]  Keith Oatley,et al.  Emotion and narrative fiction: Interactive influences before, during, and after reading , 2011, Cognition & emotion.

[24]  Alan Day,et al.  Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts , 2000 .

[25]  D. Hanauer.  What we know about reading poetry: Theoretical positions and empirical research , 2001 .

[26]  Ruth Filik,et al.  “They” as a gender-unspecified singular pronoun: Eye tracking reveals a processing cost , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  M Freeman,et al.  General Editors’ Preface , 2010, Arthurian Literature XXXVI.

[28]  B. Levy,et al.  Fluent rereading: Repetition, automaticity, and discrepancy. , 1992 .

[29]  J. Hyönä,et al.  Eye movements during repeated reading of a text. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[30]  David S. Miall,et al.  Foregrounding, Defamiliarization, and Affect: Response to Literary Stories , 1994 .

[31]  N. Phillips.  Literary Neuroscience and History of Mind , 2015 .

[32]  Elizabeth R Schotter,et al.  Task effects reveal cognitive flexibility responding to frequency and predictability: Evidence from eye movements in reading and proofreading , 2014, Cognition.

[33]  Keiyu Niikuni,et al.  Effects of punctuation on the processing of temporarily ambiguous sentences in Japanese , 2014 .

[34]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[35]  Minho Lee,et al.  Effects of search intent on eye-movement patterns in a change detection task , 2015 .

[36]  Michaela Mahlberg,et al.  Reading Dickens’s characters: Employing psycholinguistic methods to investigate the cognitive reality of patterns in texts , 2014, Language and literature.

[37]  Jerome McGann,et al.  The Textual Condition , 2020 .

[38]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  Word frequency effects and eye movements during two readings of a text. , 1995, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[39]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Eye movements and semantic composition , 2004 .

[40]  David S. Miall,et al.  The form of reading: Empirical studies of literariness , 1998 .

[41]  Keiyu Niikuni,et al.  The Role of Punctuation in Processing Relative-Clause Sentence Constructions in Japanese , 2015, EAPCogSci.

[42]  Petra Hoffstaedter,et al.  Poetic text processing and its empirical investigation , 1987 .

[43]  R. Jakobson.  Linguistics and poetics , 1960 .

[44]  Eugene J. Dawydiak,et al.  Linguistic focus and good-enough representations: An application of the change-detection paradigm , 2004, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.