CuBIC: cumulant based inference of higher-order correlations in massively parallel spike trains

Recent developments in electrophysiological and optical recording techniques enable the simultaneous observation of large numbers of neurons. A meaningful interpretation of the resulting multivariate data, however, presents a serious challenge. In particular, the estimation of higher-order correlations that characterize the cooperative dynamics of groups of neurons is impeded by the combinatorial explosion of the parameter space. The resulting requirements with respect to sample size and recording time has rendered the detection of coordinated neuronal groups exceedingly difficult. Here we describe a novel approach to infer higher-order correlations in massively parallel spike trains that is less susceptible to these problems. Based on the superimposed activity of all recorded neurons, the cumulant-based inference of higher-order correlations (CuBIC) presented here exploits the fact that the absence of higher-order correlations imposes also strong constraints on correlations of lower order. Thus, estimates of only few lower-order cumulants suffice to infer higher-order correlations in the population. As a consequence, CuBIC is much better compatible with the constraints of in vivo recordings than previous approaches, which is shown by a systematic analysis of its parameter dependence.

[1]  M. Wilson,et al.  Analyzing Functional Connectivity Using a Network Likelihood Model of Ensemble Neural Spiking Activity , 2005, Neural Computation.

[2]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Analysis of Higher-Order Correlations in Multiple Parallel Processes , 2002, Neurocomputing.

[3]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population , 2005, Nature.

[4]  A. Aertsen,et al.  Representation of cooperative firing activity among simultaneously recorded neurons. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Can Spike Coordination Be Differentiated from Rate Covariation? , 2008, Neural Computation.

[6]  Wolf Singer,et al.  Neuronal Synchrony: A Versatile Code for the Definition of Relations? , 1999, Neuron.

[7]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Unitary Events in Multiple Single-Neuron Spiking Activity: II. Nonstationary Data , 2002, Neural Computation.

[8]  Shy Shoham,et al.  Generation of Spike Trains with Controlled Auto- and Cross-Correlation Functions , 2009, Neural Computation.

[9]  Asohan Amarasingham,et al.  Internally Generated Cell Assembly Sequences in the Rat Hippocampus , 2008, Science.

[10]  D. W. Wheeler,et al.  NeuroXidence : A Non-parametric Test on Excess or Deficiency of Joint-spike Events , 2006 .

[11]  John M. Beggs,et al.  A Maximum Entropy Model Applied to Spatial and Temporal Correlations from Cortical Networks In Vitro , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Ilan N Goodman,et al.  Inferring the capacity of the vector Poisson channel with a Bernoulli model , 2008, Network.

[13]  Rachel Jones Visual system: Catch a shooting star , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[14]  A Aertsen,et al.  ‘Dynamics of neuronal interactions’ cannot be explained by ‘neuronal transients’ , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  C. van Vreeswijk,et al.  What Is the Neural Code , 2006 .

[16]  Jonathon Shlens,et al.  The Structure of Large-Scale Synchronized Firing in Primate Retina , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Alexander S. Ecker,et al.  Generating Spike Trains with Specified Correlation Coefficients , 2009, Neural Computation.

[18]  Emery N. Brown,et al.  State-space analysis on time-varying correlations in parallel spike sequences , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[19]  Romain Brette,et al.  Generation of Correlated Spike Trains , 2009, Neural Computation.

[20]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Behavior-dependent short-term assembly dynamics in the medial prefrontal cortex , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Effectiveness of systematic spike dithering depends on the precision of cortical synchronization , 2008, Brain Research.

[22]  Garrett B Stanley,et al.  Timing Precision in Population Coding of Natural Scenes in the Early Visual System , 2008, PLoS biology.

[23]  Uri T Eden,et al.  A point process framework for relating neural spiking activity to spiking history, neural ensemble, and extrinsic covariate effects. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  M. A. Smith,et al.  Stimulus Dependence of Neuronal Correlation in Primary Visual Cortex of the Macaque , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  J. Knott The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory , 1951 .

[26]  K. Vahala Handbook of stochastic methods for physics, chemistry and the natural sciences , 1986, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics.

[27]  B. Streitberg Lancaster Interactions Revisited , 1990 .

[28]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Language models based on Hebbian cell assemblies , 2006, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[29]  Robert Lund,et al.  An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes, Vol. 1: Elementary Theory and Methods (2nd ed.) (Book) , 2004 .

[30]  Albert K. Lee,et al.  Whole-Cell Recordings in Freely Moving Rats , 2006, Neuron.

[31]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Analysis of Parallel Spike Trains , 2010 .

[32]  Pieter R. Roelfsema,et al.  How Precise is Neuronal Synchronization? , 1995, Neural Computation.

[33]  A. Reyes,et al.  Relation between single neuron and population spiking statistics and effects on network activity. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[34]  P. Lennie The Cost of Cortical Computation , 2003, Current Biology.

[35]  Benjamin Lindner,et al.  Superposition of many independent spike trains is generally not a Poisson process. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[36]  W Singer,et al.  Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[37]  Peter Dayan,et al.  The Effect of Correlated Variability on the Accuracy of a Population Code , 1999, Neural Computation.

[38]  Stefan Rotter,et al.  Analysis of higher-order neuronal interactions based on conditional inference , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[39]  Professor Dr. Jos J. Eggermont The Correlative Brain , 1990, Studies of Brain Function.

[40]  M K Habib,et al.  Dynamics of neuronal firing correlation: modulation of "effective connectivity". , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Unitary Events in Multiple Single-Neuron Spiking Activity: I. Detection and Significance , 2002, Neural Computation.

[42]  R. G. Medhurst,et al.  Topics in the Theory of Random Noise , 1969 .

[43]  Yoshio Sakurai,et al.  The search for cell assemblies in the working brain , 1998, Behavioural Brain Research.

[44]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  Spike Count Reliability and the Poisson Hypothesis , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  Pieter R. Roelfsema,et al.  The Effects of Pair-wise and Higher-order Correlations on the Firing Rate of a Postsynaptic Neuron , 1998, Neural Computation.

[46]  Asohan Amarasingham,et al.  Hippocampus Internally Generated Cell Assembly Sequences in the Rat , 2011 .

[47]  P. Holgate Estimation for the bivariate Poisson distribution , 1964 .

[48]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Detecting synfire chain activity using massively parallel spike train recording. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Spatially organized spike correlation in cat visual cortex , 2007, Neurocomputing.

[50]  S. Rotter,et al.  Decomposition of neuronal assembly activity via empirical de-Poissonization , 2007, 0711.1965.

[51]  A. Aertsen,et al.  Neuronal assemblies , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[52]  Stefano Panzeri,et al.  The impact of high-order interactions on the rate of synchronous discharge and information transmission in somatosensory cortex , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[53]  David J. Field,et al.  What Is the Other 85 Percent of V1 Doing , 2006 .

[54]  W. Singer,et al.  Synchronization of neuronal responses in primary visual cortex of monkeys viewing natural images. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[55]  Peter E. Latham,et al.  Pairwise Maximum Entropy Models for Studying Large Biological Systems: When They Can Work and When They Can't , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[56]  L. Paninski Maximum likelihood estimation of cascade point-process neural encoding models , 2004, Network.

[57]  Stefan Rotter,et al.  Measurement of variability dynamics in cortical spike trains , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[58]  Christian Borgelt,et al.  Efficient Identification of Assembly Neurons within Massively Parallel Spike Trains , 2009, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[59]  M. A. Smith,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Scales of Neuronal Correlation in Primary Visual Cortex , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[60]  Ad Aertsen,et al.  Stable propagation of synchronous spiking in cortical neural networks , 1999, Nature.

[61]  W. Singer,et al.  Stimulus-dependent synchronization of neuronal responses in the visual cortex of the awake macaque monkey , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[62]  Donald L. Snyder,et al.  Random Point Processes in Time and Space , 1991 .

[63]  Yutaka Sakai,et al.  Synchronous Firing and Higher-Order Interactions in Neuron Pool , 2003, Neural Computation.

[64]  Shun-ichi Amari,et al.  Information-Geometric Measure for Neural Spikes , 2002, Neural Computation.

[65]  Kathryn B. Laskey,et al.  Neural Coding: Higher-Order Temporal Patterns in the Neurostatistics of Cell Assemblies , 2000, Neural Computation.

[66]  M. Abeles Role of the cortical neuron: integrator or coincidence detector? , 1982, Israel journal of medical sciences.

[67]  D. Perkel,et al.  Cooperative firing activity in simultaneously recorded populations of neurons: detection and measurement , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[68]  Stefan Rotter,et al.  Higher-Order Statistics of Input Ensembles and the Response of Simple Model Neurons , 2003, Neural Computation.

[69]  Stefan Rotter,et al.  Correlations and Population Dynamics in Cortical Networks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[70]  Michael N. Shadlen,et al.  Synchrony Unbound A Critical Evaluation of the Temporal Binding Hypothesis , 1999, Neuron.

[71]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Impact of Higher-Order Correlations on Coincidence Distributions of Massively Parallel Data , 2007, Summer School on Neural Networks.

[72]  Ad Aertsen,et al.  Editorial: Cell Assemblies , 2003 .

[73]  M. Kendall,et al.  Kendall's advanced theory of statistics , 1995 .

[74]  P. König,et al.  High-order events in cortical networks: a lower bound. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[75]  Günther Palm,et al.  Detecting higher-order interactions among the spiking events in a group of neurons , 1995, Biological Cybernetics.

[76]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Detecting unitary events without discretization of time , 1999, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[77]  I. Miller Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes , 1966 .

[78]  Y. Sakurai,et al.  Dynamic Synchrony of Firing in the Monkey Prefrontal Cortex during Working-Memory Tasks , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[79]  K. Harris Neural signatures of cell assembly organization , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[80]  S. Grün,et al.  Estimating the temporal precision and size of correlated groups of neurons from population activity , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[81]  A. Villa,et al.  Detection of syntonies between multiple spike trains using a coarse-grain binarization of spike count distributions , 2004, Network.

[82]  A. Aertsen,et al.  Spike synchronization and rate modulation differentially involved in motor cortical function. , 1997, Science.

[83]  H. Bergman,et al.  Lack of spike-count and spike-time correlations in the substantia nigra reticulata despite overlap of neural responses. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[84]  Athanasios Papoulis,et al.  Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes , 1965 .

[85]  Gèunther Palm,et al.  Neural Assemblies: An Alternative Approach to Artificial Intelligence , 1982 .

[86]  Moshe Abeles,et al.  Corticonics: Neural Circuits of Cerebral Cortex , 1991 .

[87]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[88]  Elvira Di Nardo,et al.  A unifying framework for $k$-statistics, polykays and their multivariate generalizations , 2006, math/0607623.

[89]  Maria Marinaro,et al.  Dynamic Brain - from Neural Spikes to Behaviors , 2008, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[90]  Ernst Niebur,et al.  Generation of Synthetic Spike Trains with Defined Pairwise Correlations , 2007, Neural Computation.

[91]  Gordon Pipa,et al.  NeuroXidence: reliable and efficient analysis of an excess or deficiency of joint-spike events , 2009, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[92]  J. Assad,et al.  Beyond Poisson: Increased Spike-Time Regularity across Primate Parietal Cortex , 2009, Neuron.

[93]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spatio-temporal correlations and visual signalling in a complete neuronal population , 2008, Nature.

[94]  Gilles Laurent,et al.  Shall We Even Understand the Fly’s Brain? , 2006 .

[95]  W. Singer,et al.  Neuronal assemblies: necessity, signature and detectability , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[96]  A. Aertsen,et al.  Conditions for Propagating Synchronous Spiking and Asynchronous Firing Rates in a Cortical Network Model , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[97]  Michael N. Shadlen,et al.  Noise, neural codes and cortical organization , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[98]  Jonathon Shlens,et al.  The Structure of Multi-Neuron Firing Patterns in Primate Retina , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[99]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Higher-Order Correlations in Non-Stationary Parallel Spike Trains: Statistical Modeling and Inference , 2009, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[100]  DiesmannMarkus,et al.  Unitary events in multiple single-neuron spiking activity , 2002 .

[101]  R. Kass,et al.  Multiple neural spike train data analysis: state-of-the-art and future challenges , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.