The adoption of sustainable innovations: The role of instrumental, environmental, and symbolic attributes for earlier and later adopters

[1]  Ulf J. J. Hahnel,et al.  Intentions to adopt photovoltaic systems depend on homeowners' expected personal gains and behavior of peers , 2015 .

[2]  Linda Steg,et al.  Can Protection Motivation Theory predict pro-environmental behavior? Explaining the adoption of electric vehicles in the Netherlands , 2014 .

[3]  Jonah Berger,et al.  When Identity Marketing Backfires: Consumer Agency in Identity Expression , 2014 .

[4]  E. Dütschke,et al.  How do Consumers Perceive Electric Vehicles? A Comparison of German Consumer Groups , 2014 .

[5]  Ernst H. Noppers,et al.  The adoption of sustainable innovations: Driven by symbolic and environmental motives , 2014 .

[6]  Jillian Anable,et al.  The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles , 2013 .

[7]  Mark Burgess,et al.  Electric vehicle drivers' reported interactions with the public: Driving stereotype change? , 2013 .

[8]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Spotlights, Floodlights, and the Magic Number Zero: Simple Effects Tests in Moderated Regression , 2012 .

[9]  Suzanna Long,et al.  Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions , 2012 .

[10]  I. Neumann,et al.  Experiencing Range in an Electric Vehicle: Understanding Psychological Barriers , 2012 .

[11]  Kenneth S Kurani,et al.  Households’ Stories of Their Encounters With a Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle , 2012 .

[12]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  Interpersonal Influence within Car Buyers' Social Networks: Applying Five Perspectives to Plug-in Hybrid Vehicle Drivers , 2012 .

[13]  Dana Anaby,et al.  What vehicle features are considered important when buying an automobile? An examination of driver preferences by age and gender. , 2011, Journal of safety research.

[14]  Andrew F. Hayes,et al.  Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[15]  Reid R. Heffner,et al.  Symbolism in California’s Early Market for Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2007 .

[16]  O. Johansson-Stenman,et al.  Honestly, why are you driving a BMW? , 2006 .

[17]  Linda Steg,et al.  Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use , 2005 .

[18]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[19]  Linda Steg,et al.  INSTRUMENTAL-REASONED AND SYMBOLIC-AFFECTIVE MOTIVES FOR USING A MOTOR CAR , 2001 .

[20]  Mary K. Ericksen.  Using Self-congruity and Ideal Congruity to Predict Purchase Intention , 1997 .

[21]  Charles F. Hofacker,et al.  Measuring consumer innovativeness , 1991 .

[22]  M. Sirgy,et al.  Using self-congruity and ideal congruity to predict purchase motivation , 1985 .

[23]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  A Propositional Inventory for New Diffusion Research , 1985 .

[24]  Egon S. Pearson,et al.  Statistical research memoirs , 1936 .

[25]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition , 2003 .

[26]  C. Vlek,et al.  Cognitive-reasoned and affective-emotional motives for using a motor car. , 2001 .

[27]  L. Steg.  CAR USE: LUST AND MUST , 2001 .

[28]  J. Thøgersen,et al.  Marketing of electric vehicles , 1999 .

[29]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[30]  H. Dittmar.  The social psychology of material possessions: To have is to be , 1992 .

[31]  D. Bem.  Self-Perception Theory , 1972 .

[32]  E. E. Jones,et al.  From Acts To Dispositions The Attribution Process In Person Perception1 , 1965 .

[33]  J. Neyman,et al.  Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application to some educational problems. , 1936 .