Mental states inside out: Switching costs for emotional and nonemotional sentences that differ in internal and external focus

Mental states—such as thinking, remembering, or feeling angry, happy, or dizzy—have a clear internal component. We feel a certain way when we are in these states. These internal experiences may be simulated when people understand conceptual references to mental states. However, mental states can also be described from an “external” perspective, for example when referring to “smiling.” In those cases, simulation of visible outside features may be more relevant for understanding. In a switching costs paradigm, we presented semantically unrelated sentences describing emotional and nonemotional mental states while manipulating their internal or external focus. The results show that switching costs occur when participants shift between sentences with an internal and an external focus. This suggests that different forms of simulation underlie understanding these sentences. In addition, these effects occurred for emotional and nonemotional mental states, suggesting that they are grounded in a similar way—through the process of simulation.

[1]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[2]  R. H. Phaf,et al.  Affective modulation of recognition bias. , 2005, Emotion.

[3]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Gender, Emotion, and the Embodiment of Language Comprehension , 2009 .

[4]  J. Forgas Feeling and thinking : the role of affect in social cognition , 2000 .

[5]  Agneta H. Fischer,et al.  When the Mind Forms Fear: Embodied Fear Knowledge Potentiates Bodily Reactions to Fearful Stimuli , 2010 .

[6]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Situation models in language comprehension and memory. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Verifying Different-Modality Properties for Concepts Produces Switching Costs , 2003, Psychological science.

[8]  Irene P. Kan,et al.  ROLE OF MENTAL IMAGERY IN A PROPERTY VERIFICATION TASK: FMRI EVIDENCE FOR PERCEPTUAL REPRESENTATIONS OF CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[9]  Dirk van Rijn,et al.  Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2003 .

[10]  C. Spence,et al.  The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  G. Bower,et al.  Mental models in narrative comprehension. , 1990, Science.

[12]  Diane Pecher,et al.  A sharp image or a sharp knife: norms for the modality-exclusivity of 774 concept-property items , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[13]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: evidence from property generation. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[14]  J. F. Marques,et al.  Specialization and semantic organization: Evidence for multiple semantics linked to sensory modalities , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[15]  Tad T. Brunyé,et al.  When You and I Share Perspectives , 2009, Psychological science.

[16]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Grounding language in action , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  Agneta H. Fischer,et al.  Embodied emotion concepts: How generating words about pride and disappointment influences posture , 2009 .

[18]  P. Niedenthal Embodying Emotion , 2007, Science.

[19]  Robert B. Zajonc,et al.  Feeling and thinking: Closing the debate over the independence of affect. , 2000 .

[20]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Oculomotor mechanisms activated by imagery and memory: eye movements to absent objects , 2001, Psychological research.

[21]  Moshe Bar,et al.  See it with feeling: affective predictions during object perception , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Margaret Wilson,et al.  Six views of embodied cognition , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  Piotr Winkielman,et al.  Embodied Grounding Social , Cognitive , Affective , and Neuroscientific Approaches , 2009 .

[24]  Bettina von Helversen,et al.  Exploring the hardship of ease: Subjective and objective effort in the ease-of-processing paradigm , 2008 .

[25]  Lindsay M. Oberman,et al.  The embodied emotional mind , 2008 .

[26]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  Affect is a form of cognition: A neurobiological analysis , 2007, Cognition & emotion.

[27]  Lisa Feldman Barrett,et al.  The Future of Psychology Connecting Mind to Brain , 2009 .

[28]  C. Keysers,et al.  Evidence for mirror systems in emotions , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[30]  S. Greenspan,et al.  Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension , 1987 .

[31]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  Affect as a Psychological Primitive. , 2009, Advances in experimental social psychology.

[32]  A. Craig How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[33]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Putting words in perspective , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[34]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Both of Us Disgusted in My Insula The Common Neural Basis of Seeing and Feeling Disgust , 2003, Neuron.

[35]  G. Lakoff,et al.  The Brain's concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[36]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Situating Abstract Concepts , 2004 .

[37]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Embodied Grounding: Social, Cognitive, Affective, and Neuroscientific Approaches , 2008 .

[38]  Louise Connell,et al.  What's big and fluffy but can't be seen? Selective unimodal processing of bimodal property words. Annual Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, Amsterdam. , 2009 .

[39]  Nicolas Vermeulen,et al.  Switching Between Sensory and Affective Systems Incurs Processing Costs , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[40]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Emotion simulation during language comprehension , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[41]  A. Craig,et al.  How do you feel — now? The anterior insula and human awareness , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[42]  L. Pessoa On the relationship between emotion and cognition , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[43]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. , 1996 .

[44]  G. Clore,et al.  Feelings and phenomenal experiences , 1996 .

[45]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Symbol Grounding and Meaning: A Comparison of High-Dimensional and Embodied Theories of Meaning , 2000 .

[46]  William S Horton,et al.  Out of sight, out of mind: Occlusion and the accessibility of information in narrative comprehension , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[47]  L. Connell,et al.  What is big and fluffy but can't be seen? Selective unimodal processing of bimodal property words , 2009 .

[48]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[49]  W. Schneider,et al.  Perceptual Knowledge Retrieval Activates Sensory Brain Regions , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Perceptual Processing Affects Conceptual Processing , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[51]  P. Niedenthal,et al.  Embodiment of emotion concepts. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[52]  Kristen A. Lindquist,et al.  The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review , 2012, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[53]  Michael A. Becker Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles , 1998 .