Poor Validation of Medical Record ICD-9 Diagnoses of Gout in a Veterans Affairs Database

Objective. Diagnostic codes based on medical records or claims data have been used to identify patient populations with gout for important epidemiologic and clinical studies. We evaluated whether we can document the accuracy of such diagnoses by review of medical records and then on direct interviews with a subset of patients. Methods. Electronic medical records of 289 patients with 2 visits with ICD-9 codes for gout were extensively reviewed to search for documentation of features that would classify patients as having gout by 3 sets of proposed criteria, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), New York, or Rome criteria. Records of patients who had been seen by rheumatologists were compared with all others. A subset of patients seen in clinic were directly interviewed for comparison with the results from the records. Results. Based on medical records review there was documentation of gout by the ACR criteria in only 36%, Rome criteria in 30%, and New York criteria in 33%. Records of patients who had seen rheumatologists had better documentation of classification features. Interview in clinic of 37 patients also improved documentation of the 3 sets of criteria features of gout in 65%–81% of those with ICD-9 codes for gout. Conclusion. We found it difficult to confirm ICD-9 coded diagnoses of gout using currently available proposed criteria from details recorded in medical records. This may reflect a problem with available criteria and with documentation. Direct interview of patients may be needed to confirm the presence of typical features when high specificity is desired.

[1]  Jasvinder A Singh,et al.  Accuracy of Veterans Administration databases for a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[2]  J. O'sullivan Gout in a New England town. A prevalence study in Sudbury, Massachusetts. , 1972, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[3]  W. Bilker,et al.  Gout epidemiology: results from the UK General Practice Research Database, 1990–1999 , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[4]  J. H. Kellgren,et al.  Population Studies of the Rheumatic Diseases , 1969 .

[5]  Hyon K. Choi Epidemiology of crystal arthropathy. , 2006, Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America.

[6]  J. S. Lawrence,et al.  The Epidemiology of Chronic Rheumatism , 1964 .

[7]  Hassan Fouayzi,et al.  Validity of gout diagnoses in administrative data. , 2007, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[8]  Sebastian Schneeweiss,et al.  Accuracy of Medicare claims-based diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction: estimating positive predictive value on the basis of review of hospital records. , 2004, American heart journal.

[9]  D. Mccarty,et al.  Preliminary criteria for the classification of the acute arthritis of primary gout. , 1977, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[10]  R. Wortmann,et al.  Increasing prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia over 10 years among older adults in a managed care population. , 2004, The Journal of rheumatology.

[11]  M. Liang,et al.  Sensitivity and positive predictive value of Medicare Part B physician claims for rheumatologic diagnoses and procedures. , 1997, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[12]  H. Schumacher,et al.  Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for Gout: Comparsion With the Gold Standard of Synovial Fluid Crystal Analysis , 2009, Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases.

[13]  Serguei V. S. Pakhomov,et al.  Agreement between patient-reported symptoms and their documentation in the medical record. , 2008, The American journal of managed care.