In vivo osteochondrogenic potential of cultured cells derived from the periosteum.

Periosteal cells were isolated from young chicks, introduced into cell culture, subcultured, and then inoculated into athymic, nude mice to test the in vivo osteochondrogenic potential of cultured periosteal cells. In monolayer cultures, the adherent periosteal cells showed fibroblastlike morphology and overtly expressed neither osteogenic nor chondrogenic phenotypes. Cultured cells inoculated heterotopically into nude mice eventually gave rise to bone tissue at the subcutaneous injection site. The process of bone formation occurred through two different mechanisms: intramembranous bone formation at the peripheral portion of the inoculum early and endochondral bone formation in the central portion later. Frozen, preserved periosteal cells also formed bone after introduction into nude mice in the same temporal histologic sequence as the unfrozen cells. Cultured chick muscle fibroblasts from donors that were the same age as controls did not form bone or cartilage when inoculated under identical conditions to those of cultured periosteal cells. These results suggest that periosteum of young chicks contains subsets of progenitor cells that possess the potential to differentiate directly into osteoblasts or chondrocytes when inoculated in vivo. Importantly, this potential is retained after enzymatic isolation, cell culture, subculturing, and freeze preservation.

[1]  C. R. Howlett,et al.  Ultrastructure of bone and cartilage formed in vivo in diffusion chambers. , 1984, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  P. Boonekamp,et al.  Bone formation by isolated calvarial osteoblasts in syngeneic and allogeneic transplants: light microscopic observations. , 1983, The American journal of anatomy.

[3]  A. Caplan,et al.  Osteogenesis in cultures of limb mesenchymal cells. , 1979, Developmental biology.

[4]  V. Ritsilä,et al.  The osteogenic capacity of free periosteal and osteoperiosteal grafts. A comparative study in growing rabbits. , 1979, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[5]  G. Conrad,et al.  Cartilage cell differentiation: review. , 1979, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  D. V. Cohn,et al.  Target cells in bone for parathormone and calcitonin are different: enrichment for each cell type by sequential digestion of mouse calvaria and selective adhesion to polymeric surfaces. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  A. Caplan,et al.  The control of muscle and cartilage development in the chick limb: the role of differential vascularization. , 1973, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[8]  C. Andrew L. Bassett,et al.  Current concepts of bone formation. , 1962 .

[9]  A. Ham A HISTOLOGICAL STUDY OF THE EARLY PHASES OF BONE REPAIR , 1930 .

[10]  H. B. Fell The histogenesis of cartilage and bone in the long bones of the embryonic fowl , 1925 .

[11]  J. Hunnicutt,et al.  THE OSTEOGENIC POWER OF PERIOSTEUM: WITH A NOTE ON BONE TRANSPLANTATION AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY , 1915, Annals of surgery.

[12]  S. Bruder,et al.  First bone formation and the dissection of an osteogenic lineage in the embryonic chick tibia is revealed by monoclonal antibodies against osteoblasts. , 1989, Bone.

[13]  A. Friedenstein,et al.  Stromal stem cells: marrow-derived osteogenic precursors. , 1988, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[14]  A. Caplan,et al.  Morphology of bone development and bone remodeling in embryonic chick limbs. , 1986, Bone.

[15]  M Iturralde Navarro,et al.  [Culture of animal cells]. , 1984, Medicina clinica.

[16]  W. Peck,et al.  Cyclic 3'5'-adenosine monophosphate in isolated bone cells. Response to low concentrations of parathyroid hormone. , 1973, Endocrinology.

[17]  V. Ritsilä,et al.  Bone formation with free periosteum. An experimental study. , 1972, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery.