Making Decentralization Work: A Cross-national Examination of Local Governments and Natural Resource Governance in Latin America

There has been increased emphasis in the last three decades on the decentralization of natural resource governance decisions to local government in developing countries as a means of improving environmental quality, public service delivery, and the accountability of local officials. We examine the performance of decentralization of natural resource management services in a large sample of municipal governments in four Latin American countries. Our analysis includes a variety of factors discussed in the literature as important in influencing the responsiveness of government officials to local needs. We provide a nested institutional model in which local officials respond to incentives created by the structure of formal political institutions at both the local and national level. The results provide support for the importance of considering local and national institutional arrangements as these co-determine the political incentives within decentralized systems.

[1]  Krister P. Andersson,et al.  From Local Strongman to Facilitator , 2007 .

[2]  E. Ostrom,et al.  COLLECTIVE ACTION , PROPERTY RIGHTS , AND DEVOLUTION OF FOREST AND PROTECTED AREA MANAGEMENT , 1999 .

[3]  S. Rose-Ackerman,et al.  Does Federalism Preserve Markets , 1997 .

[4]  A. Larson.  Natural Resources and Decentralization in Nicaragua: Are Local Governments Up to the Job? , 2002 .

[5]  Dilip Mookherjee,et al.  Decentralisation and Accountability in Infrastructure Delivery in Developing Countries , 2006 .

[6]  Arun Agrawal,et al.  Accountability in decentralization: A framework with South Asian and West African cases , 1999 .

[7]  A. Rowland.  Population as a determinant of local outcomes under decentralization: illustrations from small municipalities in Bolivia and Mexico , 2001 .

[8]  John A. Booth,et al.  Civil Society, Political Capital, and Democratization in Central America , 1998, The Journal of Politics.

[9]  Raymond J. Fisman,et al.  Decentralization and Corruption: Evidence Across Countries , 2000 .

[10]  C. Gibson,et al.  The Politics of Decentralized Natural Resource Governance , 2004, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[11]  On the determinants of fiscal centralization: Theory and evidence , 1999 .

[12]  George E. Delury.  World encyclopedia of political systems & parties , 1983 .

[13]  J. Tendler.  Good government in the tropics , 1997 .

[14]  J. Ribot,et al.  Democratic decentralization of natural resources: Institutionalizing popular participation , 2002 .

[15]  H. Teune.  Local Government and Democratic Political Development , 1995 .

[16]  Daniel Treisman,et al.  The causes of corruption: a cross-national study , 2000 .

[17]  J. Lin,et al.  New Structural Economics: A Framework for Rethinking Development , 2010 .

[18]  P. Ward,et al.  Opposition Government in Mexico , 1995 .

[19]  Barry R. Weingast.  The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development , 1995 .

[20]  Dilip Mookherjee,et al.  Capture and Governance at Local and National Levels , 2000 .

[21]  Harry W. Blair,et al.  Participation and Accountability at the Periphery: Democratic Local Governance in Six Countries , 2000 .

[22]  David J. Samuels,et al.  Decentralization and democracy in Latin America , 2005 .

[23]  Antonio Estache.  DECENTRALIZING INFRASTRUCTURE: ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS , 1995 .

[24]  Margaret Levi,et al.  Social and Unsocial Capital: A Review Essay of Robert Putnam's Making Democracy Work , 1996 .

[25]  R. Prud’homme.  The dangers of decentralization , 1995 .

[26]  C. Gibson,et al.  The Politics of Decentralizing Natural Resource Policy , 2004 .

[27]  Mark Purcell,et al.  Against the local trap: scale and the study of environment and development , 2005 .

[28]  Dilip Mookherjee,et al.  Corruption and Decentralization of Infrastructure Delivery in Developing Countries , 2000 .

[29]  J. Litvack.  Rethinking Decentralization in Developing Countries , 1998 .

[30]  Aart Kraay,et al.  Growth without Governance , 2002 .

[31]  Erik Wibbels.  Federalism and the Politics of Macroeconomic Policy and Performance , 2000 .

[32]  Klaus Deininger,et al.  Does Greater Accountability Improve the Quality of Public Service Delivery? Evidence from Uganda , 2005 .

[33]  F. Laerhoven,et al.  Local Governments and Rural Development: Comparing Lessons from Brazil, Chile, Mexico, and Peru , 2008 .

[34]  Erik Wibbels,et al.  Beyond the Fiction of Federalism: Macroeconomic Management in Multitiered Systems , 2002 .

[35]  H. Gintis,et al.  Social Capital and Community Governance , 2002 .

[36]  S. Stokes,et al.  Elections and representation , 2006 .

[37]  E. Ostrom.  Decentralization and Development: The New Panacea , 2001 .

[38]  B. Ames,et al.  Electoral Rules, Constituency Pressures, and Pork Barrel: Bases of Voting in the Brazilian Congress , 1995, The Journal of Politics.

[39]  D. Rondinelli,et al.  Analysing Decentralization Policies in Developing Countries: a Political-Economy Framework , 1989 .

[40]  D. Brinkerhoff,et al.  How Citizens Participate in Macroeconomic Policy: International Experience and Implications for Poverty Reduction , 2003 .

[41]  R. Putnam,et al.  Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. , 1994 .

[42]  Ernesto H. Stein,et al.  The New Political Economy: Positive Economics and Negative Politics , 1989 .

[43]  M. E. Freire,et al.  Annual World Bank Conference on development in Latin America and the Caribbean 1999: decentralization and accountability of the public sector. Proceedings of a Conference held in Valdivia, Chile, 20-22 June, 1999. , 2000 .

[44]  M. Woolcock.  Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework , 1998 .

[45]  Susan C. Stokes,et al.  Democracy, Accountability, and Representation: Subject Index , 1999 .

[46]  J. S. Long,et al.  Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata, 2nd Edition , 2005 .

[47]  James C. Scott,et al.  Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed , 1999 .

[48]  L. Hooghe,et al.  Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance , 2003, American Political Science Review.

[49]  F. Rojas,et al.  Beyond the center - decentralizing the State , 1999 .

[50]  Jonathan Rodden.  Comparative Federalism and Decentralization: On Meaning and Measurement , 2004 .

[51]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Enchantment and Disenchantment: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation , 1999 .

[52]  Samuel Paul.  Making Voice Work: The Report Card on Bangalore's Public Service , 1998 .

[53]  W. Riker,et al.  Disharmony in Federal Government , 2007 .

[54]  A. Alesina,et al.  On the Number and Size of Nations , 1995 .

[55]  E. Willis,et al.  The Politics of Decentralization in Latin America , 1999, Latin American Research Review.

[56]  Guillermo E. Perry,et al.  Decentralization and accountability of the public sector , 2000 .

[57]  Krister P. Andersson,et al.  What Motivates Municipal Governments? Uncovering the Institutional Incentives for Municipal Governance of Forest Resources in Bolivia , 2003 .

[58]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Collective Action, Property Rights, and Decentralization in Resource Use in India and Nepal , 2001 .

[59]  Ariel Fiszbein.  The Emergence of local capacity: Lessons from Colombia☆ , 1997 .

[60]  J. Ribot.  Waiting for democracy: The politics of choice in natural resource decentralization , 2004 .

[61]  C. Roa.  BUILDING INSTITUTIONS FOR MARKETS , 2002 .

[62]  Ronald J. Oakerson,et al.  분권화 시대의 대도시 거버넌스 = Governing local public economies : creating the civic metropolis , 1999 .

[63]  James C. Scott.  Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed , 1999 .

[64]  R. Nickson.  Local government in Latin America , 2018, The Routledge Handbook of International Local Government.

[65]  G. Peterson.  Decentralization in Latin America: Learning Through Experience , 1997 .

[66]  Ernesto Calvo,et al.  Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Electoral Market , 2004 .

[67]  P. R. Oyono.  One step forward, two steps back? Paradoxes of natural resources management decentralisation in Cameroon , 2004, The Journal of Modern African Studies.

[68]  V. Ostrom,et al.  The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry , 1961, American Political Science Review.

[69]  Charles M. Tiebout.  A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures , 1956, Journal of Political Economy.

[70]  A. Joshi.  Institutions and Service Delivery in Asia , 2006 .

[71]  J. Manor.  The Political Economy of Democratic Decentralization , 1999 .

[72]  P. Seabright.  Accountability and decentralisation in government: An incomplete contracts model , 1996 .

[73]  Jason Wittenberg,et al.  Making the Most Of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation , 2000 .

[74]  Financial Development and the Intersectoral Transfer of Resources: The Case of Thailand , 1989 .

[75]  Ken Kollman,et al.  Introduction—Authority Migration: Defining an Emerging Research Agenda , 2004, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[76]  J. Manor,et al.  Democracy and Decentralisation in South Asia and West Africa: Participation, Accountability and Performance , 1998 .

[77]  J. Fox.  The Difficult Transition from Clientelism to Citizenship: Lessons from Mexico , 1994, World Politics.

[78]  J. C. Brown,et al.  There’s nothing inherent about scale: political ecology, the local trap, and the politics of development in the Brazilian Amazon , 2005 .