Piracy in innovation processes: violation or collaboration?

Piracy as infringement of intellectual property is considered a major issue in innovation processes. The assessment of what piracy is mainly bases on legal criteria and is done from an organisational perspective. Current innovation processes particularly with regard to small and medium-sized enterprises are characterised by nonlinear collaboration forms which involve different stakeholders from various origins. Within such communities intense knowledge exchange across firms’ boundaries is inevitably and can be seen as a source for idea development. In this paper, the mechanism of innovation and knowledge processes are therefore discussed from a practice-based and process perspective. It is argued that current assessments of piracy do not meet practice demands of open innovation processes and rather restrain idea development. An example case from a SME type firm illustrates practice of innovation-based collaboration.

[1]  Steffen Roth The Eye-Patch of the Beholder: Introduction to Entrepreneurship and Piracy , 2014 .

[2]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[3]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[4]  M. West,et al.  Innovation and creativity at work::Psychological and organizational strategies , 1992 .

[5]  M. West Sparkling Fountains or Stagnant Ponds: An Integrative Model of Creativity and Innovation Implementation in Work Groups , 2002 .

[6]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[7]  Frank Blackler,et al.  On the Life of the Object , 2005 .

[8]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Co-creation and the new landscapes of design , 2008 .

[9]  David Y. Choi,et al.  Online piracy, innovation, and legitimate business models , 2007 .

[10]  Susan E. Reid,et al.  The Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development for Discontinuous Innovations: A Theoretical Model , 2004 .

[11]  S. Gherardi,et al.  Through the practice lens: Where is the bandwagon of practice-based studies heading? , 2010 .

[12]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[13]  Justin W. Webb,et al.  You Say Illegal, I Say Legitimate: Entrepreneurship in the Informal Economy , 2009 .

[14]  C. Freeman Economics of Industrial Innovation , 1975 .

[15]  M. West Innovation and creativity at work , 1997 .

[16]  C. Schneider,et al.  Fences and Competition in Patent Races , 2008 .

[17]  Bart Victor,et al.  Invented Here: Maximizing Your Organization's Internal Growth and Profitability , 1998 .

[18]  H. Mandl,et al.  Inert knowledge: Analyses and remedies , 1996 .

[19]  Majid Yar The rhetorics and myths of anti-piracy campaigns: criminalization, moral pedagogy and capitalist property relations in the classroom , 2008, New Media Soc..

[20]  J. Kaivo-oja,et al.  Smart Regions: Two Cases of Crowdsourcing for Regional Development , 2013 .

[21]  M. Polanyi,et al.  Knowing and being : essays , 1969 .

[22]  F. Blackler Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation , 1995 .

[23]  C. Anthony Di Benedetto,et al.  Diffusion of Innovation , 2015 .

[24]  Patrick Waelbroeck,et al.  Piracy of Digital Products: A Critical Review of the Theoretical Literature , 2006, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[25]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Situated Action: A Symbolic Interpretation , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[26]  E. Rogers,et al.  Communication of Innovations; A Cross-Cultural Approach. , 1974 .

[27]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Book Reviews : The Social Life of Information By John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000. 320 pages , 2000 .

[28]  A. Arora,et al.  Ideas for rent: an overview of markets for technology , 2010 .

[29]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[30]  S. Gherardi Introduction: The Critical Power of the `Practice Lens' , 2009 .

[31]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  From Teams to Knots: Activity-Theoretical Studies of Collaboration and Learning at Work , 2008 .

[32]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[33]  J. Swan,et al.  The Construction of `Communities of Practice' in the Management of Innovation , 2002 .

[34]  Len Jessup,et al.  How Open Innovation Affects the Drivers of Competitive Advantage , 2012 .

[35]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[36]  P. Mayring Qualitative Content Analysis , 2000 .

[37]  K. Hussinger,et al.  Pre-empted patents, infringed patents and firms’ participation in markets for technology , 2014 .

[38]  S. Dreyfus,et al.  Peripheral Vision , 2005 .

[39]  Hubert L. Dreyfus,et al.  Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer , 1987, IEEE Expert.

[40]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[41]  K. Blind,et al.  Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany , 2006 .

[42]  Steffen Roth Booties, Bounties, Business Models: A Map to the Next Red Oceans , 2014 .

[43]  M. D. Myers,et al.  Qualitative Research in Business & Management , 2008 .

[44]  K. Schulz Proceedings of Olkc 2007 – " Learning Fusion " Shared Knowledge and Understandings in Organizations -its Development and Impact in Organizational Learning Processes , 2022 .

[45]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .