A Quality-Distinction Model of IT Capabilities: Conceptualization and Two-Stage Empirical Validation Using CMMi Processes

In this paper, we develop a model of information technology (IT) service provider capabilities termed the quality distinction (QD) model that is theoretically rooted in the resource-based view and quality management literatures, and operationalized using the widely used capability maturity model (CMM) framework. The QD model is theorized to consist of one dynamic capability (i.e., process adaptation capability) and three operational capabilities (i.e., life cycle, prevention quality, and appraisal quality capabilities). These four capabilities are initially operationalized using definitions of the 22 processes in the CMM integration framework. A panel of experts is used to assign the 22 processes to the four capabilities in the QD model. Rigorous scale-refinement procedures are used and 15 CMM processes are retained as a result. Survey data collected from IT service providers are, then, used to compare the theorized QD model with the staged and continuous models in the CMM framework. Results from a covariance-based structural equation modeling analysis provide good support to the hypothesis that the QD model is superior to the two CMM models (the staged and continuous representations), with the theorized model showing high fit indices and high psychometric properties. Results also provide support for the hypothesis that processes should be operationalized as routines with a combination of both ostensive and performative aspects.

[1]  Sasa M. Dekleva,et al.  Measuring Software Engineering Evolution: A Rasch Calibration , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  Anand Nair,et al.  Meta-analysis of the relationship between quality management practices and firm performance -- Implications for quality management theory development , 2006 .

[3]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[4]  Ron Chi-Wai Kwok,et al.  IT outsourcing evolution---: past, present, and future , 2003, CACM.

[5]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Develop Long-Term Competitiveness through IT Assets , 1996 .

[6]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Gary Klein,et al.  An exploration of the relationship between software development process maturity and project performance , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[8]  Mayuram S. Krishnan,et al.  Measuring Process Consistency: Implications for Reducing Software Defects , 1999, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[9]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[10]  Watts S. Humphrey,et al.  Managing the software process , 1989, The SEI series in software engineering.

[11]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Software quality and the Capability Maturity Model , 1997, CACM.

[12]  Arun Rai,et al.  Development infrastructure characteristics and process capability , 2002, CACM.

[13]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[14]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[15]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[16]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles , 2003 .

[17]  W. D. Perreault,et al.  Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments , 1989 .

[18]  James C. Anderson,et al.  Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities. , 1991 .

[19]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Total Quality Management in Information Systems Development: Key Constructs and Relationships , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Hale Kaynak,et al.  The relationship between total quality management: practices and their effects on firm performance , 2003 .

[21]  M. S. Krishnan,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of Productivity and Quality in Software Products , 2000 .

[22]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[23]  J. Barney,et al.  CAPABILITIES, BUSINESS PROCESSES, AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: CHOOSING THE DEPENDENT VARIABLE IN EMPIRICAL TESTS OF THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2004 .

[24]  Mayuram S. Krishnan,et al.  Effects of Process Maturity on Quality, Cycle Time, and Effort in Software Product Development , 2000 .

[25]  Sendil K. Ethiraj,et al.  Where Do Capabilities Come from and How Do They Matter? A Study in the Software Services Industry , 2005 .

[26]  R. Rust,et al.  Reliability Measures for Qualitative Data: Theory and Implications , 1994 .

[27]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Survey Research Methodology in Management Information Systems: An Assessment , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Bradford K. Clark.  Quantifying the effects of process improvement on effort , 2000 .

[29]  Joseph Moses Juran.  Juran on planning for quality , 1988 .

[30]  Narayan Ramasubbu,et al.  Work Dispersion, Process-Based Learning, and Offshore Software Development Performance , 2008, MIS Q..

[31]  Shahid A. Zia,et al.  Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries & Competitors , 2013 .

[32]  R. Grant,et al.  A KNOWLEDGE-BASED THEORY OF INTER-FIRM COLLABORATION. , 1995 .

[33]  Benoit Aubert,et al.  Série Scientifique Scientific Series a Resource-based Analysis of It Sourcing a Resource-based Analysis of It Sourcing * , 2022 .

[34]  W. D. Perreault,et al.  Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments , 1989 .

[35]  V. Grover,et al.  Decisions to Outsource Information Systems Functions: Testing a Strategy‐Theoretic Discrepancy Model , 1995 .

[36]  Anandasivam Gopal,et al.  Certification in the Indian Offshore IT Services Industry , 2009, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[37]  Rajiv Kishore,et al.  Reconceptualizing Innovation Compatibility as Organizational Alignment in Secondary IT Adoption Contexts: An Investigation of Software Reuse Infusion , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[38]  K. B. Hendricks,et al.  Quality awards and the market value of the firm: an empirical investigation , 1996 .

[39]  L. Willcocks,et al.  Taking the measure of outsourcing providers , 2005 .

[40]  S. Winter.  Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[41]  M. Wade,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research , 2004 .

[42]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[43]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Structural analysis of the impact of knowledge creation and knowledge embedding on software process capability , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[44]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[45]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[46]  R. H. Connery,et al.  Processes of organization and management , 1948 .

[47]  Sun-Jen Huang,et al.  Selection priority of process areas based on CMMI continuous representation , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[48]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  BOARD OF DIRECTOR INVOLVEMENT IN RESTRUCTURING: THE EFFECTS OF BOARD VERSUS MANAGERIAL CONTROLS , 1993 .

[49]  Eugene G. McGuire,et al.  Factors affecting the quality of software project management: an empirical study based on the Capability Maturity Model , 1996, Software Quality Journal.

[50]  T. C. Powell.  Total Quality Management as Competitive Advantage , 1995 .

[51]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[52]  Ram Narasimhan,et al.  Examining market oriented aspects of cost of quality , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[53]  Rajiv Kishore,et al.  Determinants of Sourcing During Technology Growth and Maturity: An Empirical Study of e-Commerce Sourcing , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[54]  Srikant M. Datar,et al.  Models for measuring and accounting for cost of conformance quality , 1993 .

[55]  V. R. Kannan,et al.  Influence of initiators on supply chain value creation , 2004 .

[56]  Ravinder Nath,et al.  A study of the relationships between total quality management implementation factors and software quality , 2000 .

[57]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Quality Management in Systems Development: An Organizational System Perspective , 2000, MIS Q..

[58]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  New service development competence in retail banking: Construct development and measurement validation , 2007 .

[59]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .

[60]  Qing Chang,et al.  How Low Should You Go? Low Response Rates and the Validity of Inference in IS Questionnaire Research , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[61]  Eitan Naveh,et al.  Innovation and Attention to Detail in the Quality Improvement Paradigm , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[62]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  Performance Effects of Information Technology Synergies in Multibusiness Firms , 2006, MIS Q..

[63]  Mayuram S. Krishnan,et al.  The role of software processes and communication in offshore software development , 2002, CACM.

[64]  Sandra Slaughter,et al.  Quality Improvement and Infrastructure Activity Costs in Software Development: A Longitudinal Analysis , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[65]  Manish Agrawal,et al.  Software Effort, Quality, and Cycle Time: A Study of CMM Level 5 Projects , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[66]  Tridas Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Software Processes and Project Performance , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[67]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[68]  Prabhudev Konana,et al.  The Choice of Sourcing Mechanisms for Business Processes , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[69]  Hyun-Soo Han,et al.  Analyzing the impact of a firm's capability on outsourcing success: A process perspective , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[70]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..