Interpretive layering in nature-based tourism: a simple approach for complex attractions

This paper considers the role of interpretive layering, that is, combining multiple sources of interpretation in order to repeat the interpretive message, in nature-based tourism. We explore interpretive layering at an attraction (the Great Barrier Reef (GBR)) that presents several challenges to tourists and operators. The GBR, Australia, represents an extraordinary site where tourists typically have limited previous experience with the physical conditions, tourists are encouraged to shape their experience by choosing from a multitude of activities on offer, and where focused interpretive activities are more difficult due to the (underwater) nature of the attraction. Using 775 visitors surveys distributed on the return trip from the reef, we analysed the relationship between the number of interpretive types used and changes in visitors' knowledge levels, attitudes and behavioural intentions. The results highlight the important additive effects of a variety of interpretive sources on visitors' understanding of this attraction. We propose that interpretive layering may be particularly relevant to attractions that are harder to accommodate within visitors' existing frames of reference and might also be usefully applied in (post-Fordist) tourism that is characterised by a trend away from packaged mass tourism, towards products that favour flexibility, individuality, hybridity and activity.

[1]  A. Watson,et al.  Education to reduce impacts in forest campgrounds. , 1985 .

[2]  B. Weiler,et al.  Does more interpretation lead to greater outcomes? An assessment of the impacts of multiple layers of interpretation in a zoo context , 2009 .

[3]  Susanna Curtin Nature, Wild Animals and Tourism: An Experiential View , 2005 .

[4]  B. Prideaux,et al.  SUCCESSFUL INTERPRETATION IN GREAT BARRIER REEF TOURISM: DIVE IN OR KEEP OUT OF IT? , 2011 .

[5]  S. Mccool,et al.  Information Quantity and Communication Effectiveness: Low-Impact Messages on Wilderness Trailside Bulletin Boards , 1997 .

[6]  E. Madin,et al.  Environmental Interpretation in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park: An Assessment of Programme Effectiveness , 2004 .

[7]  J. Heimlich Adult Learning in Nonformal Institutions. ERIC Digest No. 173. , 1996 .

[8]  E. Armstrong,et al.  Getting the Message Across: An Analysis of Messages Delivered by Tour Operators in Protected Areas , 2002 .

[9]  G. Moscardo,et al.  The role of interpretation in wildlife tourism , 2004 .

[10]  Gianna Moscardo,et al.  Interpretation and sustainable tourism: functions, examples and principles. [Reprint of original article published in v.9, no.1, 1998: 2-13.] , 1998 .

[11]  B. Prideaux,et al.  Responding to stakeholder research needs using a visitor monitoring survey: the case of the Great Barrier Reef tourism industry , 2008 .

[12]  F. Lindberg,et al.  Understanding nature-based tourist experiences: an ontological analysis , 2011 .

[13]  Sheila J. Backman,et al.  A Preliminary Investigation into the Psychographics of Nature-Based Travelers to the Southeastern United States , 1996 .

[14]  David Uzzell,et al.  Interpreting our heritage: A theoretical interpretation , 2006 .

[15]  B. Weiler,et al.  To Re-Enact or Not to Re-Enact? Investigating the Impacts of First- and Third-Person Interpretation at a Heritage Tourism Site , 2012 .

[16]  Jeffrey L. Marion,et al.  Minimising Visitor Impacts to Protected Areas: The Efficacy of Low Impact Education Programmes , 2007 .

[17]  P. Dyer,et al.  Heritage and hermeneutics: towards a broader interpretation of interpretation , 2009 .

[18]  M. Hughes,et al.  Environmental Interpretation Evaluation in Natural Areas , 2008 .

[19]  Peter Davies,et al.  Learning to Think: Thinking to Learn , 1991 .

[20]  R. Ballantyne,et al.  Contemporary issues in heritage and environmental interpretation : problems and prospects , 1998 .

[21]  M. Hughes,et al.  Influence of On-site Interpretation Intensity on Visitors to Natural Areas , 2005 .

[22]  G. Moscardo Don't know, don't care: the importance of information for visitors to the Great Barrier Reef , 2002 .

[23]  Gianna Moscardo,et al.  Making Visitors Mindful: Principles for Creating Sustainable Visitor Experiences through Effective Communication , 1999 .

[24]  D. Fennell,et al.  A Content Analysis of Ecotourism Definitions , 2001 .

[25]  David Airey,et al.  The Multiple Assessment of Interpretation Effectiveness: Promoting Visitors’ Environmental Attitudes and Behavior , 2011 .

[26]  Robert E. Manning,et al.  Emerging Principles for Using Information/Education in Wilderness Management , 2003 .

[27]  G. Moscardo,et al.  How Great is the Great Barrier Reef! Tourists' Knowledge and Understanding of the World Heritage Status of the Great Barrier Reef , 2001 .

[28]  S Nature-based Tourism ! , 2022 .

[29]  Mehmet Mehmetoglu Nature-Based Tourism: A Contrast to Everyday Life , 2007 .

[30]  H. Zeppel Education and Conservation Benefits of Marine Wildlife Tours: Developing Free-Choice Learning Experiences , 2008 .

[31]  A. McIntosh,et al.  An Insight into the Personal and Emotive Context of Wildlife Viewing at the Penguin Place, Otago Peninsula, New Zealand , 2000 .

[32]  Targeted interpretation: exploring relationships among visitors' motivations, activities, attitudes, information needs and preferences , 1998 .

[33]  Sam H. Ham,et al.  Environmental Interpretation: A Practical Guide for People with Big Ideas and Small Budgets , 1993 .