Daily activities and hand function in women with scleroderma

Objective: To give a detailed description of hand function and the ability to perform daily activities among patients with systemic sclerosis. Methods: Thirty patients with scleroderma answered a self‐administered activities of daily living (ADL) questionnaire. Hand function was estimated with respect to hand mobility, dexterity, and grip force. Perceived symptoms were reported on a visual analogue scale (VAS), and skin thickness was assessed by means of the modified Rodnan skin score. Results: Finger flexion and extension were the most impaired aspects of hand mobility. Dexterity was on average reduced to 68–80%, and grip force to 46–65% compared with values for healthy persons. The predominant self‐perceived problem was Raynaud's phenomenon, whereas pitting scars/ulcers were perceived as the least problem. Activities building on hand and arm function were harder to perform than activities depending on lower limb function. Raynaud's phenomenon, stiffness, grip force, and dexterity were factors with the strongest associations with ADL difficulties. Assistive devices and alternative working methods improved ADL ability. Conclusion: Impaired hand function was related to ADL difficulties and the use of assistive devices improved ADL. This emphasizes the importance of treatments that improve hand function and of testing ergonomic tools.

[1]  M. Eklund,et al.  Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS) test: the reliability of a novel hand function test. , 2000, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[2]  J. Poole,et al.  The use of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) to determine physical disability in systemic sclerosis. , 1991, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[3]  G. Grimby,et al.  Grip force in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia and in healthy subjects. A study with the Grippit instrument. , 1993, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[4]  M. Matucci-Cerinic,et al.  Systemic sclerosis (scleroderma): an integrated challenge in rehabilitation. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  B. Wright,et al.  The structure of an instrument for assessing the effects of assistive devices and altered working methods in women with rheumatoid arthritis. , 1996, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[6]  P. Clements.  Systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) and related disorders: clinical aspects. , 2000, Bailliere's best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology.

[7]  A. Masi.  Preliminary criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). , 1980, Bulletin on the rheumatic diseases.

[8]  A. Silman,et al.  Assessment of functional ability in patients with scleroderma: a proposed new disability assessment instrument. , 1998, The Journal of rheumatology.

[9]  G. Grimby,et al.  Questionnaire to evaluate the effects of assistive devices and altered working methods in women with rheumatoid arthritis , 2005, Clinical Rheumatology.

[10]  Serafino Buono,et al.  ICF- INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH , 2003 .

[11]  B. Wright,et al.  Observations are always ordinal; measurements, however, must be interval. , 1989, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  A. Silman.  Epidemiology of scleroderma , 1991, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[13]  F. Wollheim,et al.  Computer based quantitative analysis of capillary abnormalities in systemic sclerosis and its relation to plasma concentration of von Willebrand factor. , 1996, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[14]  A. Silman,et al.  Lack of relationship between functional ability and skin score in patients with systemic sclerosis. , 2001, The Journal of rheumatology.

[15]  F. Wollheim,et al.  Organ manifestations in 100 patients with progressive systemic sclerosis: a comparison between the CREST syndrome and diffuse scleroderma. , 1989, British journal of rheumatology.

[16]  S. Iwarsson,et al.  Occupation and survival: a 25-year follow-up study of an aging population. , 1998, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[17]  G. Stucki,et al.  Development and validation of a self-administered systemic sclerosis questionnaire (SySQ). , 1999, Rheumatology.

[18]  P. Merkel,et al.  Measurement of functional status, self-assessment, and psychological well-being in scleroderma. , 1998, Current opinion in rheumatology.

[19]  M. Mayes,et al.  Correlates of the disability index of the health assessment questionnaire: a measure of functional impairment in systemic sclerosis. , 1999, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[20]  C. Black.  Systemic sclerosis 'state of the art' 1995. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[21]  M. Eklund,et al.  Validity of HAMIS: a test of hand mobility in scleroderma. , 2000, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[22]  J. Tiffin,et al.  The Purdue pegboard; norms and studies of reliability and validity. , 1948, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  James F. Fries,et al.  Preliminary criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Subcommittee for scleroderma criteria of the American Rheumatism Association Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee. , 1980, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[24]  M. Law,et al.  A critical review of scales of activities of daily living. , 1989, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.