Social Media Battles: their Impact during the 2014 Greek Municipal Elections

The purpose of this study is to examine the use of social media such as Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube by candidates running for the 2014 Greek Municipal Elections by addressing the following questions: (1) which factors affect social media adoption by municipal candidates?, and (2) whether social media usage along with the popularity of candidates' social media pages influence candidates' vote share. Results indicate that social media are not very popular campaigning tools among municipal candidates in Greece. This implies that Greek candidates still rely on traditional ways to lure their voters. Furthermore, findings reveal that candidates running in large municipalities are more likely to utilize social media (i.e., Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube) as means of political marketing. In addition, challengers seem to prefer Facebook and Twitter as campaign tools while males tend to focus on YouTube to attract voters. Despite the low adoption rate, results suggest that candidates who made use of social media won more votes compared to candidates who were not social media users. Moreover, it was found that a candidate's Facebook page and YouTube channel popularity are good indicators of the candidate's vote share.

[1]  Girish J. Gulati,et al.  Gulati elections of 2006 and 2008 Social networks in political campaigns : Facebook and the congressional , 2013 .

[2]  R. Gibson,et al.  Online Campaigning in France, 2007–2012: Political Actors and Citizens in the Aftermath of the Web.2.0 Evolution , 2014 .

[3]  Rune Karlsen A Platform for Individualized Campaigning? Social Media and Parliamentary Candidates in the 2009 Norwegian Election Campaign , 2011 .

[4]  P. Chen Candidates' new media use in the 2007 Australian national election , 2008 .

[5]  The Greens of Finland in social media: Facebook as a communication forum , 2012 .

[6]  Christine B. Williams,et al.  Congressional Candidates' Use of YouTube in 2008: Its Frequency and Rationale , 2010 .

[7]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  Social Media and Political Participation: Are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube Democratizing Our Political Systems? , 2011, ePart.

[8]  Pippa Norris,et al.  A Virtuous Circle: TRENDS IN POLITICAL COMMUNICATIONS , 2000 .

[9]  Maurice Vergeer,et al.  Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning , 2013 .

[10]  Juliann Cortese,et al.  Looking Back as We Prepare to Move Forward: US Presidential Candidates' Adoption of YouTube , 2012, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[11]  Miltiadis D. Lytras,et al.  Enabling Technologies and Business Infrastructures for Next Generation Social Media: Big Data, Cloud Computing, Internet of Things and Virtual Reality , 2015, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[12]  C. Williams,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations and Online Campaigns: Social Media Adoption in the 2010 U.S. Congressional Elections , 2011 .

[13]  Wiley Interscience Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology , 2013 .

[14]  JungherrAndreas,et al.  Why the Pirate Party Won the German Election of 2009 or The Trouble With Predictions , 2012 .

[15]  Ivan Horrocks,et al.  New Technology and Democratic Renewal : The Evidence Assessed , 2000 .

[16]  R. Gibson,et al.  Normalising or Equalising Party Competition? Assessing the Impact of the Web on Election Campaigning , 2015 .

[17]  Kim Normann Andersen,et al.  The Use of Facebook in National Election Campaigns: Politics as Usual? , 2009, ePart.

[18]  Mahesh S. Raisinghani,et al.  The Impact of the Internet on Politics: The "Net Effect" on Political Campaigns and Elections , 2011, Int. J. E Politics.

[19]  Sanne Kruikemeier,et al.  How political candidates use Twitter and the impact on votes , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  G. Lappas,et al.  Web Campaign in the 2002 Greek Municipal Elections , 2005 .

[21]  Girish J. Gulati,et al.  Social Media and Campaign 2012 , 2013 .

[22]  V. Gueorguieva,et al.  Voters, MySpace, and YouTube , 2008 .

[23]  Sonja Utz,et al.  The (Potential) Benefits of Campaigning via Social Network Sites , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[24]  J. Macnamara,et al.  E-Electioneering 2010: Trends in Social Media Use in Australian Political Communication , 2011 .

[25]  Mira Sotirovic,et al.  A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies , 2001 .

[26]  J. Golbeck,et al.  Twitter use by the U.S. Congress , 2010 .

[27]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  Introduction: The Facebook Election , 2010 .

[28]  I. Pena-Lopez Striving Behind the Shadow: The Dawn of Spanish Politics 2.0 , 2011 .

[29]  Lucia Vesnic-Alujevic,et al.  Political participation and web 2.0 in Europe: a case study of Facebook , 2012 .

[30]  G. Enli,et al.  PERSONALIZED CAMPAIGNS IN PARTY-CENTRED POLITICS , 2013 .

[31]  Heather K. Evans,et al.  Twitter Style: An Analysis of How House Candidates Used Twitter in Their 2012 Campaigns , 2014, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[32]  Bethany A. Conway,et al.  Twitter Use by Presidential Primary Candidates During the 2012 Campaign , 2013 .

[33]  Kim Strandberg,et al.  A social media revolution or just a case of history repeating itself? The use of social media in the 2011 Finnish parliamentary elections , 2013, New Media Soc..

[34]  A. Larsson,et al.  ‘Of course we are on Facebook’: Use and non-use of social media among Swedish and Norwegian politicians , 2014, European journal of communication.

[35]  Kasper M. Hansen,et al.  Cyber-Campaigning in Denmark: Application and Effects of Candidate Campaigning , 2014 .

[36]  Mengxiong Liu,et al.  The Impact of the Internet , 2001 .

[37]  U. Klinger MASTERING THE ART OF SOCIAL MEDIA , 2013 .

[38]  Rosalynd Southern,et al.  Is Web 2.0 Providing a Voice for Outsiders? A Comparison of Personal Web Site and Social Media Use by Candidates at the 2010 UK General Election , 2015 .