‘That's for old so and so's!’: does identity influence older adults’ technology adoption decisions?

Abstract The role of identity in older adults’ decision-making about assistive technology adoption has been suggested but not fully explored. This scoping review was conducted to understand better how older adults’ self-image and their desire to maintain this influence their decision-making processes regarding assistive technology adoption. Using the five-stage scoping review framework by Arksey and O'Malley, a total of 416 search combinations were run across nine databases, resulting in a final yield of 49 articles. From these 49 articles, five themes emerged: (a) resisting the negative reality of an ageing and/or disabled identity; (b) independence and control are key; (c) the aesthetic dimension of usability; (d) assistive technology as a last resort; and (e) privacy versus pragmatics. The findings highlight the importance of older adults’ desire to portray an identity consistent with independence, self-reliance and competence, and how this desire directly impacts their assistive technology decision-making adoption patterns. These findings aim to support the adoption of assistive technologies by older adults to facilitate engagement in meaningful activities, enable social participation within the community, and promote health and wellbeing in later life.

[1]  F. Gall,et al.  The Identity Theory , 1936, Nature.

[2]  S. Dunstone.  The Role of Theory in , 2011 .

[3]  J. Rowe,et al.  Human aging: usual and successful. , 1987, Science.

[4]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[5]  Laura C Hurd,et al.  “We're Not Old!”: Older Women's Negotiation of Aging and Oldness , 1999 .

[6]  D. Lupton,et al.  Technology, selfhood and physical disability. , 2000, Social science & medicine.

[7]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[8]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Elaine B. Hyder,et al.  The ELDer project: social, emotional, and environmental factors in the design of eldercare technologies , 2000, CUU '00.

[10]  S. Brownsell,et al.  Do community alarm users want telecare? , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[11]  The Impact of Experience and Heuristics on Everyday Decisions to Use Mobility Devices: The Need for Control in Nine African-American Older Adults , 2001 .

[12]  R. Dionigi.  Leisure and Identity Management in Later Life: Understanding Competitive Sport Participation Among Older Adults , 2002 .

[13]  Incorporating or Resisting Assistive Devices: Different Approaches to Achieving a Desired Occupational Self-Image , 2003 .

[14]  M. Skubic,et al.  Older adults' attitudes towards and perceptions of ‘smart home’ technologies: a pilot study , 2004, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[15]  M. Scherer,et al.  Assistive Technology Use and Stigma , 2004 .

[16]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Assistive Robotics and an Ecology of Elders Living Independently in Their Homes , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[17]  E. Porter.  Wearing and using personal emergency respone system buttons. , 2005, Journal of gerontological nursing.

[18]  C. McCreadie,et al.  The acceptability of assistive technology to older people , 2005, Ageing and Society.

[19]  The Influence of Ageism and Ageist Stereotypes on the Elderly , 2005 .

[20]  H. Arksey,et al.  Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework , 2005 .

[21]  Jiska Cohen-Mansfield,et al.  Electronic Memory Aids for Community-Dwelling Elderly Persons: Attitudes, Preferences, and Potential Utilization , 2005 .

[22]  N. Charness,et al.  Factors Predicting the Use of Technology: Findings From the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) , 2006 .

[23]  T. Leroux,et al.  Factors that influence the use of assistance technologies by older adults who have a hearing loss , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[24]  Joseph Sharit,et al.  Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[25]  K. Courtney,et al.  Obtrusiveness of information-based assistive technologies as perceived by older adults in residential care facilities: A secondary analysis , 2007, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[26]  William C. Mann,et al.  Consumer Feedback on Smart Home Applications , 2007 .

[27]  Rachael Gooberman-Hill,et al.  Making decisions about simple interventions: older people's use of walking aids. , 2007, Age and ageing.

[28]  B. Reimer,et al.  Older Adult Perceptions of Smart Home Technologies: Implications for Research, Policy & Market Innovations in Healthcare , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[29]  Masakatsu G. Fujie,et al.  Psychological Influence of Wheelchairs on the Elderly Persons from Qualitative Research of Daily Living , 2008, J. Robotics Mechatronics.

[30]  Phillip Vaughan,et al.  Involving older people with dementia and their carers in designing computer based support systems: some methodological considerations , 2009, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[31]  Khim Horton,et al.  Falls in older people: the place of telemonitoring in rehabilitation. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[32]  M. Skubic,et al.  Senior residents’ perceived need of and preferences for “smart home” sensor technologies , 2008, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[33]  M. Skubic,et al.  Needing smart home technologies: the perspectives of older adults in continuing care retirement communities. , 2008, Informatics in primary care.

[34]  Louise Nygård,et al.  The meaning of everyday technology as experienced by people with dementia who live alone , 2008 .

[35]  H. Clements,et al.  Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology , 2008 .

[36]  Robert Steele,et al.  Elderly persons' perception and acceptance of using wireless sensor networks to assist healthcare , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[37]  Eulàlia Hernández-Encuentra,et al.  ICT and Older People: Beyond Usability , 2009 .

[38]  J. Meunier,et al.  An intelligent videomonitoring system for fall detection at home: perceptions of elderly people , 2009, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[39]  Lisa I. Iezzoni,et al.  Perspectives on use of mobility aids in a diverse population of seniors: implications for intervention. , 2009, Disability and health journal.

[40]  Carmen D. Steggell,et al.  The role of technology for healthy aging among Korean and Hispanic women in the United States: A pilot study , 2010 .

[41]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Bridging the Generation Gap in ICT Use: Interrogating Identity, Technology and Interactions in Community Telecenters , 2010, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[42]  Peter Caputi,et al.  Comparison of older and younger adults' attitudes towards and abilities with computers: Implications for training and learning , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[43]  B. Leipert,et al.  When Self-Presentation Trumps Access: Why Older Adults With Low Vision Go Without Low-Vision Services , 2010 .

[44]  Louis Neven,et al.  'But obviously not for me': robots, laboratories and the defiant identity of elder test users. , 2010, Sociology of health & illness.

[45]  Pgs Paul Rutten,et al.  Ageing-in-place with the use of ambient intelligence technology: Perspectives of older users , 2011, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[46]  Lawrence Normie.  Technology for Ageing in Place , 2011 .

[47]  K. Axelsson,et al.  The Challenge of Coming to Terms with the Use of a New Digital Assistive Device: A Case Study of Two Persons with Mild Dementia , 2011, The open nursing journal.

[48]  Jeffrey W Jutai,et al.  Low vision assistive technology device usage and importance in daily occupations. , 2011, Work.

[49]  Kieran Walsh,et al.  Perceptions, Preferences, and Acceptance of Information and Communication Technologies in Older-Adult Community Care Settings in Ireland: A Case-Study and Ranked-Care Program Analysis , 2011 .

[50]  W. Mann,et al.  How Older Adults Make Decisions Regarding Smart Technology: An Ethnographic Approach , 2012, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[51]  Martin Knapp,et al.  Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: a qualitative study , 2012, BMC Health Services Research.

[52]  S. Long.  Bodies, Technologies, and Aging in Japan: Thinking About Old People and Their Silver Products , 2012, Journal of cross-cultural gerontology.

[53]  R. Harré.  Positioning Theory: Moral Dimensions of Social-Cultural Psychology , 2012 .

[54]  Sharon M. Kolb.  Grounded theory and the constant comparative method : valid research strategies for educators , 2012 .

[55]  Telecare for Older People , 2013 .

[56]  Ke Chen,et al.  Use or Non-Use of Gerontechnology—A Qualitative Study , 2013, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[57]  Håkan Eftring,et al.  What Older People Expect of Robots: A Mixed Methods Approach , 2013, ICSR.

[58]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare. , 2013, Social science & medicine.

[59]  Linda Little,et al.  Location tracking: views from the older adult population. , 2013, Age and ageing.

[60]  Ke Chen,et al.  Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: a senior technology acceptance model (STAM) , 2014, Ergonomics.

[61]  F. Hwang,et al.  Leveraging everyday technology for people living with dementia: a case study , 2014 .

[62]  A. Rigaud,et al.  Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: a mixed-method study of human–robot interaction over a 1-month period in the Living Lab setting , 2014, Clinical interventions in aging.

[63]  Astrid Gramstad,et al.  Exploring the meaning of a new assistive technology device for older individuals , 2014, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[64]  P. Gardner.  The role of social engagement and identity in community mobility among older adults aging in place , 2014, Disability and rehabilitation.

[65]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Applications in Health, Assistance, and Entertainment , 2018, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[66]  C. Berridge.  Active subjects of passive monitoring: responses to a passive monitoring system in low-income independent living , 2015, Ageing and Society.

[67]  Elsa M. Orellano-Colón,et al.  Hispanic Older Adult’s Perceptions of Personal, Contextual and Technology-Related Barriers for Using Assistive Technology Devices , 2016, Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities.

[68]  Koen Milisen,et al.  Attitudes and perceptions of adults of 60 years and older towards in-home monitoring of the activities of daily living with contactless sensors: an explorative study. , 2014, International journal of nursing studies.

[69]  Hélène Kerhervé,et al.  Bridging the digital divide in older adults: a study from an initiative to inform older adults about new technologies , 2015, Clinical interventions in aging.

[70]  Navigating uncharted territory: a qualitative study of the experience of transitioning to wheelchair use among older adults and their care providers , 2015, BMC Geriatrics.

[71]  F. Jouen,et al.  “Are we ready for robots that care for us?” Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots , 2015, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[72]  Lilit Hakobyan,et al.  Participatory Design: How to Engage Older Adults in Participatory Design Activities , 2015, Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[73]  Lucy R. Betts,et al.  Older adults' experiences and perceptions of digital technology: (Dis)empowerment, wellbeing, and inclusion , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[74]  Deborah I. Fels,et al.  “Learn what we’re going through”: attitudes of older powered chair users towards mixed reality games that involve power mobility , 2016, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[75]  R. Dionigi.  Stereotypes of Aging: Their Effects on the Health of Older Adults , 2015 .

[76]  Lynne M. Coventry,et al.  Mobile Technology for Older Adults: Protector, Motivator or Threat? , 2016, HCI.

[77]  B. Gardner,et al.  Experiences of hearing loss and views towards interventions to promote uptake of rehabilitation support among UK adults , 2016, International journal of audiology.

[78]  Deborah I Thompson,et al.  Is Participatory Design Associated with the Effectiveness of Serious Digital Games for Healthy Lifestyle Promotion? A Meta-Analysis , 2016, Journal of medical Internet research.

[79]  Randi Stokke,et al.  The Personal Emergency Response System as a Technology Innovation in Primary Health Care Services : An Integrative Review , 2016 .

[80]  A. Astell,et al.  Studies Involving People With Dementia and Touchscreen Technology: A Literature Review , 2016, JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies.

[81]  A. Astell,et al.  The benefits and barriers to technology acquisition: Understanding the decision-making processes of older adults with age-related vision loss (ARVL) , 2017 .

[82]  A. Astell,et al.  The Use of Motion-Based Technology for People Living With Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Literature Review , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[83]  Sebastian Merkel,et al.  Participatory Design in Gerontechnology: A Systematic Literature Review , 2019, The Gerontologist.

[84]  J. Bongaarts,et al.  United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division World Family Planning 2020: Highlights, United Nations Publications, 2020. 46 p. , 2020 .