Performance evaluation of public transit systems using a combined evaluation method

The goal of this paper is to evaluate the performance of public transit systems based on a combined evaluation method (CEM) consisting of information entropy theory and super efficiency data envelopment analysis (SE-DEA). Taking 13 transit operators in Yangtze Delta Region of China as the research object, we integrate the public transit industry regulations, transit operation and passenger requirements to construct an evaluation indicator system based on satisfaction and efficiency. The CEM is used to evaluate the performance. The results show significant differences in the efficiency scores between CEM and SE-DEA. The CEM can reduce the risks of SE-DEA affected by the dimensions of indicators, and improve its discrimination capability. The evaluation outcomes of the CEM seem to be more objective, therefore, provide a more suitable basis for decision-making related to public transit service performance, as well as for the study of operation and management.

[1]  Arnold Reisman,et al.  Content analysis of data envelopment analysis literature and its comparison with that of other OR/MS fields , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[2]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[3]  Larry Jenkins,et al.  A multivariate statistical approach to reducing the number of variables in data envelopment analysis , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Classification and regression trees , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[5]  Anne Yvrande-Billon,et al.  Ownership, Contractual Practices and Technical Efficiency: The Case of Urban Public Transport in France , 2007 .

[6]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[7]  Michael Norman,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: The Assessment of Performance , 1991 .

[8]  Matthew G. Karlaftis,et al.  Efficiency Measurement in Public Transport: Are Findings Specification Sensitive? , 2012 .

[9]  K. Kerstens.  Technical efficiency measurement and explanation of French urban transit companies , 1996 .

[10]  David A. Hensher,et al.  SERVICE QUALITY AS A PACKAGE: WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO HETEROGENEOUS CONSUMERS? , 2001 .

[11]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[12]  James Odeck,et al.  The effect of mergers on efficiency and productivity of public transport services , 2008 .

[13]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Jonathan Cowie,et al.  Organisation form, scale effects and efficiency in the British bus industry , 1999 .

[15]  Carlo Scarpa,et al.  Do competition and ownership matter? Evidence from local public transport in Europe , 2010 .

[16]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[17]  Sue McNeil,et al.  Comparing the Performance of Bus Routes after Adjusting for the Environment Using Data Envelopment Analysis , 2008 .

[18]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[19]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Decomposing technical efficiency and scale elasticity in two-stage network DEA , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Gordon J. Fielding,et al.  PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR BUS TRANSIT , 1985 .

[21]  Hiroyuki Iseki,et al.  Measuring Cost Variability in Provision of Transit Service , 2010 .

[22]  Graziella Fornengo,et al.  The impact of ownership on the cost of bus service provision: an example from Italy , 2009 .

[23]  Matthew G. Karlaftis,et al.  A DEA approach for evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of urban transit systems , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Naoto Yorino,et al.  Evaluating Performance of Electricity Generating Plants using Data Envelopment Analysis : A Case of Nepal , 2006 .

[25]  Kristiaan Kerstens,et al.  Public transit performance: What does one learn from frontier studies? , 2002 .

[26]  Majid Soleimani-Damaneh,et al.  Shannon's entropy for combining the efficiency results of different DEA models: Method and application , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[27]  Attah K. Boame.  THE TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF CANADIAN URBAN TRANSIT SYSTEMS , 2004 .

[28]  Brian Caulfield,et al.  Using Data Envelopment Analysis as a public transport project appraisal tool , 2013 .

[29]  Kristiaan Kerstens,et al.  THE PERFORMANCE OF BUS-TRANSIT OPERATORS. IN: HANDBOOK OF TRANSPORT MODELLING , 2000 .

[30]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Productive efficiency and ownership of urban bus services , 1987 .

[31]  Amer Shalaby.  Simulating Performance Impacts of Bus Lanes and Supporting Measures , 1999 .

[32]  Dimitrios A Tsamboulas,et al.  Assessing Performance under Regulatory Evolution: A European Transit System Perspective , 2006 .

[33]  Z. Juan,et al.  Do contractual practices affect technical efficiency? Evidence from public transport operators in China , 2015 .

[34]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Stability regions for maintaining efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  Jonathan Cowie,et al.  Acquisition, efficiency and scale economies: An analysis of the British bus industry , 2002 .

[36]  Bruce W. Lamar,et al.  MEASURING TRANSIT PERFORMANCE USING DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 1992 .

[37]  C. Fornell,et al.  The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purpose, and Findings , 1996 .

[38]  Lin Liu,et al.  Performance evaluation of bus lines with data envelopment analysis and geographic information systems , 2009, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[39]  Howard P. Benn.  BUS ROUTE EVALUATION STANDARDS , 1995 .

[40]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[41]  Isabel María García Sánchez.  Technical and Scale Efficiency in Spanish Urban Transport: Estimating with Data Envelopment Analysis , 2009, Adv. Oper. Res..

[42]  D. Lubkeman,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Electric Distribution Utilities Based on Data Envelopment Analysis , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[43]  James Odeck,et al.  Congestion, ownership, region of operation, and scale: Their impact on bus operator performance in Norway , 2006 .

[44]  Snehamay Khasnabis,et al.  Comparative Study of Two Techniques of Transit Performance Assessment: AHP and GAT , 2002 .