Clinical trial designs for the early clinical development of therapeutic cancer vaccines.

There are major differences between therapeutic tumor vaccines and chemotherapeutic agents that have important implications for the design of early clinical trials. Many vaccines are inherently safe and do not require phase I dose finding trials. Patients with advanced cancers and compromised immune systems are not good candidates for assessing either the toxicity or efficacy of therapeutic cancer vaccines. The rapid pace of development of new vaccine candidates and the variety of possible adjuvants and modifications in method of administration makes it important to use efficient designs for clinical screening and evaluation of vaccine regimens. We review the potential advantages of a wide range of clinical trial designs for the development of tumor vaccines. We address the role of immunological endpoints in early clinical trials of tumor vaccines, investigate the design implications of attempting to use disease stabilization as an end point and discuss the difficulties of reliably utilizing historical control data. Several conclusions for expediting the clinical development of effective cancer vaccines are proposed.

[1]  R Simon,et al.  Investigating a sequence of randomized phase II trials to discover promising treatments. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  J Whitehead,et al.  Designing phase II studies in the context of a programme of clinical research. , 1985, Biometrics.

[3]  J. Cormier,et al.  Immunization against epitopes in the human melanoma antigen gp100 following patient immunization with synthetic peptides. , 1996, Cancer research.

[4]  R Simon,et al.  Bayesian design and analysis of two x two factorial clinical trials. , 1997, Biometrics.

[5]  S S Ellenberg,et al.  Randomized phase II clinical trials. , 1985, Cancer treatment reports.

[6]  Craig W. Reynolds,et al.  Complete molecular remissions induced by patient-specific vaccination plus granulocyte–monocyte colony-stimulating factor against lymphoma , 1999, Nature Medicine.

[7]  T J Yao,et al.  Optimal two-stage design for a series of pilot trials of new agents. , 1998, Biometrics.

[8]  F. Marincola,et al.  Enhancement of cellular immunity in melanoma patients immunized with a peptide from MART-1/Melan A. , 1997, The cancer journal from Scientific American.

[9]  Richard Simon,et al.  A Bayesian approach to establishang sample size and monitoring criteria for phase II clinical trials , 1994 .

[10]  C B Begg,et al.  Optimal sample size for a series of pilot trials of new agents. , 1996, Biometrics.

[11]  R W Makuch,et al.  Sample size considerations for non-randomized comparative studies. , 1980, Journal of chronic diseases.

[12]  P. Thall,et al.  Bayesian sequential monitoring designs for single-arm clinical trials with multiple outcomes. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  R. Simon,et al.  Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. , 1989, Controlled clinical trials.

[14]  R Simon,et al.  Sample size considerations for studies comparing survival curves using historical controls. , 1988, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[15]  F. Marincola,et al.  Immunologic and therapeutic evaluation of a synthetic peptide vaccine for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma , 1998, Nature Medicine.