Multimodal neuroimaging in patients with disorders of consciousness showing "functional hemispherectomy".

Beside behavioral assessment of patients with disorders of consciousness, neuroimaging modalities may offer objective paraclinical markers important for diagnosis and prognosis. They provide information on the structural location and extent of brain lesions (e.g., morphometric MRI and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI-MRI) assessing structural connectivity) but also their functional impact (e.g., metabolic FDG-PET, hemodynamic fMRI, and EEG measurements obtained in "resting state" conditions). We here illustrate the role of multimodal imaging in severe brain injury, presenting a patient in unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS; i.e., vegetative state, VS) and in a "fluctuating" minimally conscious state (MCS). In both cases, resting state FDG-PET, fMRI, and EEG showed a functionally preserved right hemisphere, while DTI showed underlying differences in structural connectivity highlighting the complementarities of these neuroimaging methods in the study of disorders of consciousness.

[1]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Real-time independent component analysis of fMRI time-series , 2003, NeuroImage.

[2]  N. Nakayama,et al.  Relationship between regional cerebral metabolism and consciousness disturbance in traumatic diffuse brain injury without large focal lesions: an FDG-PET study with statistical parametric mapping analysis , 2006, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[3]  T. Jernigan,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging during recovery from severe traumatic brain injury and relation to clinical outcome: a longitudinal study. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  AH Chowdhury,et al.  Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness : A critical review , 2009 .

[5]  K. Andrews,et al.  Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state: retrospective study in a rehabilitation unit , 1996, BMJ.

[6]  Steve Majerus,et al.  Behavioral evaluation of consciousness in severe brain damage. , 2005, Progress in brain research.

[7]  Christophe Phillips,et al.  fMRI Artefact Rejection and Sleep Scoring Toolbox , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[8]  A. Hijdra,et al.  PET scanning and neuronal loss in acute vegetative state , 2000, The Lancet.

[9]  C. Phillips,et al.  Impaired Effective Cortical Connectivity in Vegetative State: Preliminary Investigation Using PET , 1999, NeuroImage.

[10]  A. Damasio,et al.  Investigating the biology of consciousness. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[11]  María del Rosario Domínguez-Morales,et al.  Brain function in the minimally conscious state: A quantitative neurophysiological study , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  G. Edelman.  Wider than the sky : the phenomenal gift of consciousness , 2004 .

[13]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[14]  Steven Laureys,et al.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy and diffusion tensor imaging in coma survivors: promises and pitfalls. , 2009, Progress in brain research.

[15]  B. Jennett,et al.  Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. , 1974, Lancet.

[16]  Denis Le Bihan,et al.  Looking into the functional architecture of the brain with diffusion MRI , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[17]  M. Gazzaniga.  Cerebral specialization and interhemispheric communication: does the corpus callosum enable the human condition? , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  B. Jennett.  The vegetative state , 2002, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[19]  C. Degueldre,et al.  Auditory processing in the vegetative state. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  H. Gill-Thwaites.  Lotteries, loopholes and luck: Misdiagnosis in the vegetative state patient , 2006, Brain injury.

[21]  J. Giacino,et al.  The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  M. Boly,et al.  Default network connectivity reflects the level of consciousness in non-communicative brain-damaged patients. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[24]  S Laureys,et al.  Restoration of thalamocortical connectivity after recovery from persistent vegetative state , 2000, The Lancet.

[25]  Jarkko Ylipaavalniemi,et al.  Analyzing consistency of independent components: An fMRI illustration , 2008, NeuroImage.

[26]  Sriram Vasudevan,et al.  Global white matter analysis of diffusion tensor images is predictive of injury severity in traumatic brain injury. , 2007, Journal of neurotrauma.

[27]  A. Sorensen,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging as potential biomarker of white matter injury in diffuse axonal injury. , 2004, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[28]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Classification of fMRI independent components using IC-fingerprints and support vector machine classifiers , 2007, NeuroImage.

[29]  Steven Laureys,et al.  Brain function in coma, vegetative state, and related disorders , 2004, The Lancet Neurology.

[30]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[31]  M. Boly,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: Clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment , 2009, BMC neurology.

[32]  Montserrat Bernabeu,et al.  Combination of diffusion tensor and functional magnetic resonance imaging during recovery from the vegetative state , 2010, BMC neurology.

[33]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Cortex-based independent component analysis of fMRI time-series , 2001, NeuroImage.

[34]  M. Greicius,et al.  Greater than the sum of its parts: a review of studies combining structural connectivity and resting-state functional connectivity , 2009, Brain Structure and Function.

[35]  Guy B. Williams,et al.  Aetiological differences in neuroanatomy of the vegetative state: insights from diffusion tensor imaging and functional implications , 2010, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[36]  J. Giacino,et al.  The minimally conscious state: Definition and diagnostic criteria , 2002, Neurology.

[37]  N. Childs,et al.  Misdiagnosis certainly occurs , 1996, BMJ.

[38]  A. Walden,et al.  Spectral analysis for physical applications : multitaper and conventional univariate techniques , 1996 .

[39]  Richard P Brenner,et al.  The Interpretation of the EEG in Stupor and Coma , 2005, The neurologist.

[40]  Multi-Society Task Force on Pvs.  Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (1). , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[41]  R. Wise,et al.  PET scanning and neuronal loss in acute vegetative state , 2000, The Lancet.

[42]  Steven Laureys,et al.  Neuroimaging after coma , 2009, Neuroradiology.

[43]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion‐weighted MR imaging , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[44]  Brian A. Wandell,et al.  Exploring connectivity of the brain's white matter with dynamic queries , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[45]  Antti Tarkiainen,et al.  Brains and Phantoms: An ICA Study of fMRI , 2006, ICA.

[46]  Adrian M. Owen,et al.  Diffusion weighted imaging distinguishes the vegetative state from the minimally conscious state , 2011, NeuroImage.