Historically expansion turbines used for binary cycles were axial type turbines adapted from steam turbine design. They expand high-molecular-weight working fluid like isopentane which condenses at atmospheric pressure. Thus pressure ratio is limited across the turbine if a single stage design is considered. Process data for binary cycles are ideal for radial inflow turbines: pressure ratios, flows and temperatures ensure an operation very close to the maximum achievable isentropic efficiency. An extensive survey of different working fluids has been conducted: not only to determine what is the best thermal efficiency achievable but also to estimate which fluid is the most suitable for radial turbine operation. Fluids are ranked by a performance factor which enables one to select the fluid giving the best compromise between efficiency and turbine size. Then advantages of operating the binary cycle as close as possible to the critical pressure or above and with lighter organic fluid than usual are explained: It increases the recovered electrical power, whilst decreasing the expander frame size and its price. In most of the cases there is a large benefit to optimize the binary cycle process data together with the turbine design to offer the best net cycle efficiency. Another benefit in using radial inflow turbine in standard execution with variable inlet nozzles is the ability to smooth seasonal variations inherent to geothermal process. This device can be used to control the flow widely through the expander without wasteful throttling. All the expansion energy in the nozzles and wheel is recovered almost at constant isentropic efficiency throughout the year leading to very important additional income over the plant lifetime.
[1]
José Antonio Velásquez,et al.
Exergoeconomic optimisation of a Kalina cycle for power generation
,
2004
.
[2]
C. J. Bliem,et al.
Advanced Binary Geothermal Power Plants Limits Of Performance
,
1990,
Proceedings of the 25th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference.
[3]
C. J. Bliem,et al.
Vaporization at supercritical pressures and counterflow condensing of pure and mixed-hydrocarbon working fluids for geothermal power plants
,
1986
.
[4]
N. Lai,et al.
Working fluids for high-temperature organic Rankine cycles
,
2007
.
[5]
Igor Pioro,et al.
Heat Transfer and Hydraulic Resistance at Supercritical Pressures in Power Engineering Applications
,
2007
.
[6]
J. van Nuland,et al.
Organic rankine cycle
,
1987
.
[7]
François Maréchal,et al.
A Methodology for the Optimal Insertion of Organic Rankine Cycles in Industrial Processes
,
2004
.
[8]
M. McLinden,et al.
NIST Standard Reference Database 23: Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties-REFPROP, Version 8.0
,
2007
.
[9]
E. Feher.
SUPERCRITICAL THERMODYNAMIC POWER CYCLE.
,
1967
.
[10]
Sotirios Karellas,et al.
Supercritical Fluid Parameters in Organic Rankine Cycle Applications
,
2008
.
[11]
Frederick J. Cogswell.
An ORC Power Plant Operating on a Low-Temperature (165°F) Geothermal Source
,
2006
.
[12]
N. Galanis,et al.
Analysis of a carbon dioxide transcritical power cycle using a low temperature source
,
2009
.